1945年宪法在司法中的宪法重新定位——基于法律与火腿满足感的腐败偏好合作者

Joko Cahyono
{"title":"1945年宪法在司法中的宪法重新定位——基于法律与火腿满足感的腐败偏好合作者","authors":"Joko Cahyono","doi":"10.4108/eai.16-4-2022.2320082","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":". This scientific journal discusses the arrangements for implementing and granting witness status in cooperation or known as the Justice Collaborator, which invites pro and cons issues about their usefulness and consequently can be used as legal commodities, as well as subjectivity in providing their determination. To answer the question that became public unrest, a comprehensive interpretation of the Law is needed both grammatically, historically and juridically so that an understanding of whether the legal politics in the LPSK Law governing Justice Collaborator is in accordance with the objectives in terms of revealing the main actors and recovering losses countries related to the economy and development. Furthermore, t1 investigate why the status Acts of corruption were established by the Justice Collaborator in criminal proceedings does not immediately realize a social justice as in paragraph IV of the Preamble of the Republic of Indonesia Constitution 1945. It is very possible that the existing norms are incomplete, so they must be reconstructed by accommodating the principle of expediency and justice while maintaining a progressive nature of law enforcement in order to create ideal norms.","PeriodicalId":329533,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Law, Social Science, Economics, and Education, ICLSSEE 2022, 16 April 2022, Semarang, Indonesia","volume":"52 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Constitution Reposition of the 1945 Constitution in Justice Collaborators on The Corruption Delik Based on Legal and Ham Satisfaction\",\"authors\":\"Joko Cahyono\",\"doi\":\"10.4108/eai.16-4-2022.2320082\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\". This scientific journal discusses the arrangements for implementing and granting witness status in cooperation or known as the Justice Collaborator, which invites pro and cons issues about their usefulness and consequently can be used as legal commodities, as well as subjectivity in providing their determination. To answer the question that became public unrest, a comprehensive interpretation of the Law is needed both grammatically, historically and juridically so that an understanding of whether the legal politics in the LPSK Law governing Justice Collaborator is in accordance with the objectives in terms of revealing the main actors and recovering losses countries related to the economy and development. Furthermore, t1 investigate why the status Acts of corruption were established by the Justice Collaborator in criminal proceedings does not immediately realize a social justice as in paragraph IV of the Preamble of the Republic of Indonesia Constitution 1945. It is very possible that the existing norms are incomplete, so they must be reconstructed by accommodating the principle of expediency and justice while maintaining a progressive nature of law enforcement in order to create ideal norms.\",\"PeriodicalId\":329533,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Law, Social Science, Economics, and Education, ICLSSEE 2022, 16 April 2022, Semarang, Indonesia\",\"volume\":\"52 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1900-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Law, Social Science, Economics, and Education, ICLSSEE 2022, 16 April 2022, Semarang, Indonesia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4108/eai.16-4-2022.2320082\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Law, Social Science, Economics, and Education, ICLSSEE 2022, 16 April 2022, Semarang, Indonesia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4108/eai.16-4-2022.2320082","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

. 这本科学杂志讨论了在合作或被称为司法合作者中实施和授予证人地位的安排,它邀请了关于其有用性的赞成和反对问题,从而可以用作法律商品,以及提供其决定的主观性。为了回答成为公众骚乱的问题,需要在语法,历史和司法上对法律进行全面的解释,以便了解LPSK法律管辖司法合作伙伴中的法律政治是否符合揭示主要行为者和恢复损失方面的目标。此外,我将调查为什么司法合作者在刑事诉讼中确立的腐败行为地位没有立即实现《1945年印度尼西亚共和国宪法》序言部分第四段所规定的社会正义。现有的规范很有可能是不完整的,因此必须通过容纳权宜和正义原则,同时保持执法的进步性来重建它们,以创造理想的规范。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Constitution Reposition of the 1945 Constitution in Justice Collaborators on The Corruption Delik Based on Legal and Ham Satisfaction
. This scientific journal discusses the arrangements for implementing and granting witness status in cooperation or known as the Justice Collaborator, which invites pro and cons issues about their usefulness and consequently can be used as legal commodities, as well as subjectivity in providing their determination. To answer the question that became public unrest, a comprehensive interpretation of the Law is needed both grammatically, historically and juridically so that an understanding of whether the legal politics in the LPSK Law governing Justice Collaborator is in accordance with the objectives in terms of revealing the main actors and recovering losses countries related to the economy and development. Furthermore, t1 investigate why the status Acts of corruption were established by the Justice Collaborator in criminal proceedings does not immediately realize a social justice as in paragraph IV of the Preamble of the Republic of Indonesia Constitution 1945. It is very possible that the existing norms are incomplete, so they must be reconstructed by accommodating the principle of expediency and justice while maintaining a progressive nature of law enforcement in order to create ideal norms.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信