{"title":"1945年宪法在司法中的宪法重新定位——基于法律与火腿满足感的腐败偏好合作者","authors":"Joko Cahyono","doi":"10.4108/eai.16-4-2022.2320082","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":". This scientific journal discusses the arrangements for implementing and granting witness status in cooperation or known as the Justice Collaborator, which invites pro and cons issues about their usefulness and consequently can be used as legal commodities, as well as subjectivity in providing their determination. To answer the question that became public unrest, a comprehensive interpretation of the Law is needed both grammatically, historically and juridically so that an understanding of whether the legal politics in the LPSK Law governing Justice Collaborator is in accordance with the objectives in terms of revealing the main actors and recovering losses countries related to the economy and development. Furthermore, t1 investigate why the status Acts of corruption were established by the Justice Collaborator in criminal proceedings does not immediately realize a social justice as in paragraph IV of the Preamble of the Republic of Indonesia Constitution 1945. It is very possible that the existing norms are incomplete, so they must be reconstructed by accommodating the principle of expediency and justice while maintaining a progressive nature of law enforcement in order to create ideal norms.","PeriodicalId":329533,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Law, Social Science, Economics, and Education, ICLSSEE 2022, 16 April 2022, Semarang, Indonesia","volume":"52 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Constitution Reposition of the 1945 Constitution in Justice Collaborators on The Corruption Delik Based on Legal and Ham Satisfaction\",\"authors\":\"Joko Cahyono\",\"doi\":\"10.4108/eai.16-4-2022.2320082\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\". This scientific journal discusses the arrangements for implementing and granting witness status in cooperation or known as the Justice Collaborator, which invites pro and cons issues about their usefulness and consequently can be used as legal commodities, as well as subjectivity in providing their determination. To answer the question that became public unrest, a comprehensive interpretation of the Law is needed both grammatically, historically and juridically so that an understanding of whether the legal politics in the LPSK Law governing Justice Collaborator is in accordance with the objectives in terms of revealing the main actors and recovering losses countries related to the economy and development. Furthermore, t1 investigate why the status Acts of corruption were established by the Justice Collaborator in criminal proceedings does not immediately realize a social justice as in paragraph IV of the Preamble of the Republic of Indonesia Constitution 1945. It is very possible that the existing norms are incomplete, so they must be reconstructed by accommodating the principle of expediency and justice while maintaining a progressive nature of law enforcement in order to create ideal norms.\",\"PeriodicalId\":329533,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Law, Social Science, Economics, and Education, ICLSSEE 2022, 16 April 2022, Semarang, Indonesia\",\"volume\":\"52 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1900-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Law, Social Science, Economics, and Education, ICLSSEE 2022, 16 April 2022, Semarang, Indonesia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4108/eai.16-4-2022.2320082\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Law, Social Science, Economics, and Education, ICLSSEE 2022, 16 April 2022, Semarang, Indonesia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4108/eai.16-4-2022.2320082","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Constitution Reposition of the 1945 Constitution in Justice Collaborators on The Corruption Delik Based on Legal and Ham Satisfaction
. This scientific journal discusses the arrangements for implementing and granting witness status in cooperation or known as the Justice Collaborator, which invites pro and cons issues about their usefulness and consequently can be used as legal commodities, as well as subjectivity in providing their determination. To answer the question that became public unrest, a comprehensive interpretation of the Law is needed both grammatically, historically and juridically so that an understanding of whether the legal politics in the LPSK Law governing Justice Collaborator is in accordance with the objectives in terms of revealing the main actors and recovering losses countries related to the economy and development. Furthermore, t1 investigate why the status Acts of corruption were established by the Justice Collaborator in criminal proceedings does not immediately realize a social justice as in paragraph IV of the Preamble of the Republic of Indonesia Constitution 1945. It is very possible that the existing norms are incomplete, so they must be reconstructed by accommodating the principle of expediency and justice while maintaining a progressive nature of law enforcement in order to create ideal norms.