认知和个人特征与成功解决问题的相互关系

V. A. Grudinin
{"title":"认知和个人特征与成功解决问题的相互关系","authors":"V. A. Grudinin","doi":"10.28995/2073-6398-2022-2-119-132","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Within the framework of the conducted research, an attempt to study the relationship between cognitive and personal characteristics and the success of solving two types of problematic tasks: “scientific” and “artistic” content is made. 20 people took part in the study (80 protocols were processed). Two stages were carried out in this study – diagnostic and experimental. As for the diagnostic part, the features of the cognitive and personal characteristics of the participants were studied. The following techniques were used to study cognitive characteristics: “Raven’s Progressive Matrices” and the “Complex Analogies” technique. To study personal characteristics, we used: the questionnaire “SAMOAL” (the method of A.V. Lazukin adapted by N.F. Kalin) and the “Emotional Intelligence Test” by D.V. Lyusin. As for the experimental part of the study, participants were asked to solve 4 problematic tasks: “immeasurable vessel” and “universal cork” – based on scientific content and “gooseberry” and “over-salted” – based on artistic content. As for the results of the study, a positive relationship between autosympathy and the success of solving a problem of scientific content, and also between understanding one’s own and others’ emotions and the success of solving problematic tasks of artistic content was established; a negative relationship between the need for cognition and the success of solving artistic tasks was also established. No connection with cognitive characteristics was found.","PeriodicalId":253464,"journal":{"name":"RSUH/RGGU Bulletin. Series Psychology. Pedagogics. Education","volume":"4 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"THE INTERRELATIONSHIP OF COGNITIVE AND PERSONAL CHARACTERISTICS WITH THE SUCCESS OF PROBLEM SOLVING\",\"authors\":\"V. A. Grudinin\",\"doi\":\"10.28995/2073-6398-2022-2-119-132\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Within the framework of the conducted research, an attempt to study the relationship between cognitive and personal characteristics and the success of solving two types of problematic tasks: “scientific” and “artistic” content is made. 20 people took part in the study (80 protocols were processed). Two stages were carried out in this study – diagnostic and experimental. As for the diagnostic part, the features of the cognitive and personal characteristics of the participants were studied. The following techniques were used to study cognitive characteristics: “Raven’s Progressive Matrices” and the “Complex Analogies” technique. To study personal characteristics, we used: the questionnaire “SAMOAL” (the method of A.V. Lazukin adapted by N.F. Kalin) and the “Emotional Intelligence Test” by D.V. Lyusin. As for the experimental part of the study, participants were asked to solve 4 problematic tasks: “immeasurable vessel” and “universal cork” – based on scientific content and “gooseberry” and “over-salted” – based on artistic content. As for the results of the study, a positive relationship between autosympathy and the success of solving a problem of scientific content, and also between understanding one’s own and others’ emotions and the success of solving problematic tasks of artistic content was established; a negative relationship between the need for cognition and the success of solving artistic tasks was also established. No connection with cognitive characteristics was found.\",\"PeriodicalId\":253464,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"RSUH/RGGU Bulletin. Series Psychology. Pedagogics. Education\",\"volume\":\"4 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1900-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"RSUH/RGGU Bulletin. Series Psychology. Pedagogics. Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.28995/2073-6398-2022-2-119-132\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"RSUH/RGGU Bulletin. Series Psychology. Pedagogics. Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.28995/2073-6398-2022-2-119-132","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在进行的研究框架内,尝试研究认知和个人特征与成功解决两类问题任务之间的关系:“科学”和“艺术”内容。20人参加了这项研究(处理了80份协议)。本研究分为诊断和实验两个阶段。在诊断部分,研究了被试的认知特征和个人特征。以下技术被用于研究认知特征:“雷文渐进矩阵”和“复杂类比”技术。为了研究个人特征,我们使用了问卷调查“SAMOAL”(N.F. Kalin改编自A.V. Lazukin的方法)和D.V. Lyusin的“情绪智力测试”。在研究的实验部分,参与者被要求解决4个问题:“不可测量的容器”和“通用软木塞”——基于科学内容,“醋栗”和“过度盐”——基于艺术内容。研究结果表明,自我同情与科学内容问题的成功解决之间存在正相关,理解自己和他人的情绪与艺术内容问题任务的成功解决之间也存在正相关;认知需求与解决艺术任务的成功之间也存在负相关关系。与认知特征没有关联。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
THE INTERRELATIONSHIP OF COGNITIVE AND PERSONAL CHARACTERISTICS WITH THE SUCCESS OF PROBLEM SOLVING
Within the framework of the conducted research, an attempt to study the relationship between cognitive and personal characteristics and the success of solving two types of problematic tasks: “scientific” and “artistic” content is made. 20 people took part in the study (80 protocols were processed). Two stages were carried out in this study – diagnostic and experimental. As for the diagnostic part, the features of the cognitive and personal characteristics of the participants were studied. The following techniques were used to study cognitive characteristics: “Raven’s Progressive Matrices” and the “Complex Analogies” technique. To study personal characteristics, we used: the questionnaire “SAMOAL” (the method of A.V. Lazukin adapted by N.F. Kalin) and the “Emotional Intelligence Test” by D.V. Lyusin. As for the experimental part of the study, participants were asked to solve 4 problematic tasks: “immeasurable vessel” and “universal cork” – based on scientific content and “gooseberry” and “over-salted” – based on artistic content. As for the results of the study, a positive relationship between autosympathy and the success of solving a problem of scientific content, and also between understanding one’s own and others’ emotions and the success of solving problematic tasks of artistic content was established; a negative relationship between the need for cognition and the success of solving artistic tasks was also established. No connection with cognitive characteristics was found.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信