左心室辅助装置作为D期心力衰竭的目的治疗

R. Asleh, Sarah Schettle, F. Khan, S. Kushwaha
{"title":"左心室辅助装置作为D期心力衰竭的目的治疗","authors":"R. Asleh, Sarah Schettle, F. Khan, S. Kushwaha","doi":"10.11909/j.issn.1671-5411.2019.08.009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Mechanical circulatory support (MCS) has increasingly become an important management opportunity for patients with stage D heart failure (HF) with remarkable impact on patient survival and quality of life. Early clinical trials have demonstrated improved outcomes of durable left ventricular assist device (LVAD) support compared with optimal medical management. As technology advanced, continuous flow LVADs outperformed pulsatile flow devices in clinical trials and the field migrated to HeartMate (Abbott Laboratories, Abbott Park, IL) and HeartWare (Medtronic, Minneapolis, MN) devices due to their clinical superiority. Among the continuous flow devices, axial flow and centrifugal flow with magnetic levitation (MagLev) designs were subsequently investigated in clinical trials with promising findings. Compared with a survival rate of 54% with the first-generation pulsatile-flow HeartMate XVE LVADs, survival has improved to 76% and 83% with implantation of the second-generation axial-flow HeartMate II and the third-generation centrifugal-flow HeartMate III LVADs respectively, after two years of follow-up post LVAD implantation. Furthermore, minimal invasive procedures as alternatives to sternotomy for device placement, such as lateral thoracotomy, have been explored to improve postoperative recovery and long-term outcomes. Presently, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved devices include the axial flow HeartMate II, centrifugal flow with passive MagLev design of HeartWare, and centrifugal flow with a fully MagLev design of HeartMate III. All of these devices are FDA approved for patient who are supported with an LVAD while they await heart transplantation (HT) [bridge-to-transplant (BTT)] as well as for patients who are","PeriodicalId":285674,"journal":{"name":"Journal of geriatric cardiology : JGC","volume":"63 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Left ventricular assist devices as destination therapy in stage D heart failure\",\"authors\":\"R. Asleh, Sarah Schettle, F. Khan, S. Kushwaha\",\"doi\":\"10.11909/j.issn.1671-5411.2019.08.009\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Mechanical circulatory support (MCS) has increasingly become an important management opportunity for patients with stage D heart failure (HF) with remarkable impact on patient survival and quality of life. Early clinical trials have demonstrated improved outcomes of durable left ventricular assist device (LVAD) support compared with optimal medical management. As technology advanced, continuous flow LVADs outperformed pulsatile flow devices in clinical trials and the field migrated to HeartMate (Abbott Laboratories, Abbott Park, IL) and HeartWare (Medtronic, Minneapolis, MN) devices due to their clinical superiority. Among the continuous flow devices, axial flow and centrifugal flow with magnetic levitation (MagLev) designs were subsequently investigated in clinical trials with promising findings. Compared with a survival rate of 54% with the first-generation pulsatile-flow HeartMate XVE LVADs, survival has improved to 76% and 83% with implantation of the second-generation axial-flow HeartMate II and the third-generation centrifugal-flow HeartMate III LVADs respectively, after two years of follow-up post LVAD implantation. Furthermore, minimal invasive procedures as alternatives to sternotomy for device placement, such as lateral thoracotomy, have been explored to improve postoperative recovery and long-term outcomes. Presently, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved devices include the axial flow HeartMate II, centrifugal flow with passive MagLev design of HeartWare, and centrifugal flow with a fully MagLev design of HeartMate III. All of these devices are FDA approved for patient who are supported with an LVAD while they await heart transplantation (HT) [bridge-to-transplant (BTT)] as well as for patients who are\",\"PeriodicalId\":285674,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of geriatric cardiology : JGC\",\"volume\":\"63 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of geriatric cardiology : JGC\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.11909/j.issn.1671-5411.2019.08.009\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of geriatric cardiology : JGC","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.11909/j.issn.1671-5411.2019.08.009","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

机械循环支持(MCS)日益成为D期心力衰竭(HF)患者重要的治疗机会,对患者的生存和生活质量有显著影响。早期临床试验表明,与最佳医疗管理相比,持久左心室辅助装置(LVAD)支持改善了结果。随着技术的进步,连续流lvad在临床试验中的表现优于脉动流装置,由于其临床优势,该领域转移到HeartMate (Abbott Laboratories, Abbott Park, IL)和HeartWare (Medtronic, Minneapolis, MN)设备。在连续流装置中,轴流和离心的磁悬浮装置随后在临床试验中进行了研究,并取得了很好的结果。与第一代搏动式HeartMate XVE LVAD的54%生存率相比,第二代轴流式HeartMate II和第三代离心式HeartMate III LVAD在LVAD植入后随访两年,生存率分别提高到76%和83%。此外,微创手术作为胸骨切开术放置器械的替代方法,如侧胸切开术,已被探索以改善术后恢复和长期预后。目前,美国食品和药物管理局(FDA)批准的设备包括轴流HeartMate II,离心流与被动磁浮设计的HeartWare,和离心流与完全磁浮设计的HeartMate III。所有这些设备都是FDA批准的,适用于在等待心脏移植(HT)[桥式移植(BTT)]期间使用LVAD支持的患者以及正在等待心脏移植的患者
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Left ventricular assist devices as destination therapy in stage D heart failure
Mechanical circulatory support (MCS) has increasingly become an important management opportunity for patients with stage D heart failure (HF) with remarkable impact on patient survival and quality of life. Early clinical trials have demonstrated improved outcomes of durable left ventricular assist device (LVAD) support compared with optimal medical management. As technology advanced, continuous flow LVADs outperformed pulsatile flow devices in clinical trials and the field migrated to HeartMate (Abbott Laboratories, Abbott Park, IL) and HeartWare (Medtronic, Minneapolis, MN) devices due to their clinical superiority. Among the continuous flow devices, axial flow and centrifugal flow with magnetic levitation (MagLev) designs were subsequently investigated in clinical trials with promising findings. Compared with a survival rate of 54% with the first-generation pulsatile-flow HeartMate XVE LVADs, survival has improved to 76% and 83% with implantation of the second-generation axial-flow HeartMate II and the third-generation centrifugal-flow HeartMate III LVADs respectively, after two years of follow-up post LVAD implantation. Furthermore, minimal invasive procedures as alternatives to sternotomy for device placement, such as lateral thoracotomy, have been explored to improve postoperative recovery and long-term outcomes. Presently, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved devices include the axial flow HeartMate II, centrifugal flow with passive MagLev design of HeartWare, and centrifugal flow with a fully MagLev design of HeartMate III. All of these devices are FDA approved for patient who are supported with an LVAD while they await heart transplantation (HT) [bridge-to-transplant (BTT)] as well as for patients who are
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信