引起浅表真菌感染的皮肤真菌的抗真菌药物耐药性

Chowdhury PA, Azad AK, Salam MU, Ahmed MS, Fatema K
{"title":"引起浅表真菌感染的皮肤真菌的抗真菌药物耐药性","authors":"Chowdhury PA, Azad AK, Salam MU, Ahmed MS, Fatema K","doi":"10.47648/jswmc2022v1201-09","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Superficial fungal infections (SFI) are common skin diseases that were largely simple to treat. However, due to increasing antimicrobial resistance (AMR) of dermatophytes to antifungal drugs, treatment of SFI has become difficult. This study aims to analyze the AMR of dermatophytes and to correlate with the clinical response of antifungal drugs.\n\nMethods: A cross‑sectional evaluation was undertaken of 570 consecutive patients with SFI such as tinea corporis, tinea cruris, tinea faciei, and tinea pedis, who were treated with any of the oral antifungal drugs fluconazole, itraconazole and terbinafine. Clinical response was taken within 1 month of stopping the therapy. Microscopic as well as culture and antimicrobial sensitivity analysis were done to characterize and determine the susceptibility of dermatophytes to antifungal drugs aforementioned.\n\nResults: Among the 570 patients with SFI, the ratio of male (n=360, 63.16%) to female (n=210, 36.84%) was 1.7:1. The common age group affected by SFI was 31-40 years (27.71%, n=158). The tinea corporis was the most predominant (51.05%) followed by tinea cruris (13.68%). Clinical response analysis showed that the percentage of relapse of SFI after completion of treatment with fluconazole, itraconazole and terbinafine was about 55, 45 and 19, respectively. Culture and antimicrobial sensitivity analysis revealed that the percentage of resistance of dermatophytes from patients of SFI to fluconazole, itraconozole and terbinafine was approximately 70, 55 and 20, respectively.\n\nConclusion: Results reported herein support the notion that the antifungal resistance is evolving in dermatophytes causing SFI, and about 20% dermatophytes are multidrug resistant.","PeriodicalId":407803,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of Sylhet Women’s Medical College","volume":"146 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Antifungal Drug Resistance of Dermatophytes Causing Superficial Fungal Infections\",\"authors\":\"Chowdhury PA, Azad AK, Salam MU, Ahmed MS, Fatema K\",\"doi\":\"10.47648/jswmc2022v1201-09\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: Superficial fungal infections (SFI) are common skin diseases that were largely simple to treat. However, due to increasing antimicrobial resistance (AMR) of dermatophytes to antifungal drugs, treatment of SFI has become difficult. This study aims to analyze the AMR of dermatophytes and to correlate with the clinical response of antifungal drugs.\\n\\nMethods: A cross‑sectional evaluation was undertaken of 570 consecutive patients with SFI such as tinea corporis, tinea cruris, tinea faciei, and tinea pedis, who were treated with any of the oral antifungal drugs fluconazole, itraconazole and terbinafine. Clinical response was taken within 1 month of stopping the therapy. Microscopic as well as culture and antimicrobial sensitivity analysis were done to characterize and determine the susceptibility of dermatophytes to antifungal drugs aforementioned.\\n\\nResults: Among the 570 patients with SFI, the ratio of male (n=360, 63.16%) to female (n=210, 36.84%) was 1.7:1. The common age group affected by SFI was 31-40 years (27.71%, n=158). The tinea corporis was the most predominant (51.05%) followed by tinea cruris (13.68%). Clinical response analysis showed that the percentage of relapse of SFI after completion of treatment with fluconazole, itraconazole and terbinafine was about 55, 45 and 19, respectively. Culture and antimicrobial sensitivity analysis revealed that the percentage of resistance of dermatophytes from patients of SFI to fluconazole, itraconozole and terbinafine was approximately 70, 55 and 20, respectively.\\n\\nConclusion: Results reported herein support the notion that the antifungal resistance is evolving in dermatophytes causing SFI, and about 20% dermatophytes are multidrug resistant.\",\"PeriodicalId\":407803,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Journal of Sylhet Women’s Medical College\",\"volume\":\"146 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Journal of Sylhet Women’s Medical College\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.47648/jswmc2022v1201-09\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of Sylhet Women’s Medical College","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.47648/jswmc2022v1201-09","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:浅表真菌感染(SFI)是一种常见的皮肤病,在很大程度上易于治疗。然而,由于皮肤真菌对抗真菌药物的耐药性(AMR)增加,SFI的治疗变得困难。本研究旨在分析皮肤真菌的AMR及其与抗真菌药物临床疗效的关系。方法:对570例连续使用口服抗真菌药物氟康唑、伊曲康唑和特比萘芬治疗的体癣、股癣、面癣和足癣等SFI患者进行横断面评估。停药后1个月内观察临床反应。通过显微镜、培养和抗菌药物敏感性分析来表征和确定皮肤真菌对上述抗真菌药物的敏感性。结果:570例SFI患者中,男性(n=360, 63.16%)与女性(n=210, 36.84%)的比例为1.7:1。发生SFI的常见年龄组为31 ~ 40岁(27.71%,n=158)。以体癣为主(51.05%),其次为股癣(13.68%)。临床反应分析显示氟康唑、伊曲康唑和特比萘芬治疗完成后SFI复发率分别约为55、45和19。培养和抗菌药物敏感性分析显示,SFI患者皮肤真菌对氟康唑、伊曲康唑和特比萘芬的耐药率分别约为70%、55%和20%。结论:本文报道的结果支持了引起SFI的皮肤真菌的抗真菌耐药性正在进化的观点,大约20%的皮肤真菌具有多重耐药。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Antifungal Drug Resistance of Dermatophytes Causing Superficial Fungal Infections
Background: Superficial fungal infections (SFI) are common skin diseases that were largely simple to treat. However, due to increasing antimicrobial resistance (AMR) of dermatophytes to antifungal drugs, treatment of SFI has become difficult. This study aims to analyze the AMR of dermatophytes and to correlate with the clinical response of antifungal drugs. Methods: A cross‑sectional evaluation was undertaken of 570 consecutive patients with SFI such as tinea corporis, tinea cruris, tinea faciei, and tinea pedis, who were treated with any of the oral antifungal drugs fluconazole, itraconazole and terbinafine. Clinical response was taken within 1 month of stopping the therapy. Microscopic as well as culture and antimicrobial sensitivity analysis were done to characterize and determine the susceptibility of dermatophytes to antifungal drugs aforementioned. Results: Among the 570 patients with SFI, the ratio of male (n=360, 63.16%) to female (n=210, 36.84%) was 1.7:1. The common age group affected by SFI was 31-40 years (27.71%, n=158). The tinea corporis was the most predominant (51.05%) followed by tinea cruris (13.68%). Clinical response analysis showed that the percentage of relapse of SFI after completion of treatment with fluconazole, itraconazole and terbinafine was about 55, 45 and 19, respectively. Culture and antimicrobial sensitivity analysis revealed that the percentage of resistance of dermatophytes from patients of SFI to fluconazole, itraconozole and terbinafine was approximately 70, 55 and 20, respectively. Conclusion: Results reported herein support the notion that the antifungal resistance is evolving in dermatophytes causing SFI, and about 20% dermatophytes are multidrug resistant.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信