微任务众包中基于蜂群的工蚁可靠性估计算法

Alireza Moayedikia, K. Ong, Yee Ling Boo, W. Yeoh
{"title":"微任务众包中基于蜂群的工蚁可靠性估计算法","authors":"Alireza Moayedikia, K. Ong, Yee Ling Boo, W. Yeoh","doi":"10.1109/ICMLA.2016.0127","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Estimation of worker reliability on microtask crowdsourcing platforms has gained attention from many researchers. On microtask platforms no worker is fully reliable for a task and it is likely that some workers are spammers, in the sense that they provide a random answer to collect the financial reward. Existence of spammers is harmful as they increase the cost of microtasking and will negatively affect the answer aggregation process. Hence, to discriminate spammers and non-spammers one needs to measure worker reliability to predict how likely that a worker put an effort in solving a task. In this paper we introduce a new reliability estimation algorithm works based on bee colony algorithm called REBECO. This algorithm relies on Gaussian process model to estimate reliability of workers dynamically. With bees that go in search of pollen, some are more successful than the others. This maps well to our problem, where some workers (i.e., bees) are more successful than other workers for a given task thus, giving rise to a reliability measure. Answer aggregation with respect to worker reliability rates has been considered as a suitable replacement for conventional majority voting. We compared REBECO with majority voting using two real world datasets. The results indicate that REBECO is able to outperform MV significantly.","PeriodicalId":356182,"journal":{"name":"2016 15th IEEE International Conference on Machine Learning and Applications (ICMLA)","volume":"61 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"8","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Bee Colony Based Worker Reliability Estimation Algorithm in Microtask Crowdsourcing\",\"authors\":\"Alireza Moayedikia, K. Ong, Yee Ling Boo, W. Yeoh\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ICMLA.2016.0127\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Estimation of worker reliability on microtask crowdsourcing platforms has gained attention from many researchers. On microtask platforms no worker is fully reliable for a task and it is likely that some workers are spammers, in the sense that they provide a random answer to collect the financial reward. Existence of spammers is harmful as they increase the cost of microtasking and will negatively affect the answer aggregation process. Hence, to discriminate spammers and non-spammers one needs to measure worker reliability to predict how likely that a worker put an effort in solving a task. In this paper we introduce a new reliability estimation algorithm works based on bee colony algorithm called REBECO. This algorithm relies on Gaussian process model to estimate reliability of workers dynamically. With bees that go in search of pollen, some are more successful than the others. This maps well to our problem, where some workers (i.e., bees) are more successful than other workers for a given task thus, giving rise to a reliability measure. Answer aggregation with respect to worker reliability rates has been considered as a suitable replacement for conventional majority voting. We compared REBECO with majority voting using two real world datasets. The results indicate that REBECO is able to outperform MV significantly.\",\"PeriodicalId\":356182,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2016 15th IEEE International Conference on Machine Learning and Applications (ICMLA)\",\"volume\":\"61 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"8\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2016 15th IEEE International Conference on Machine Learning and Applications (ICMLA)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICMLA.2016.0127\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2016 15th IEEE International Conference on Machine Learning and Applications (ICMLA)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICMLA.2016.0127","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

摘要

微任务众包平台上工人可靠性的评估受到了许多研究者的关注。在微任务平台上,没有一个工作人员可以完全可靠地完成任务,而且有些工作人员很可能是垃圾邮件发送者,因为他们提供随机答案来收集经济奖励。垃圾邮件发送者的存在是有害的,因为他们增加了微任务的成本,并会对答案聚合过程产生负面影响。因此,要区分垃圾邮件发送者和非垃圾邮件发送者,需要衡量工作人员的可靠性,以预测工作人员努力解决任务的可能性。本文介绍了一种新的基于蜂群算法的可靠性估计算法——REBECO。该算法依靠高斯过程模型对工人的可靠性进行动态估计。对于寻找花粉的蜜蜂来说,有些蜜蜂比其他蜜蜂更成功。这很好地反映了我们的问题,其中一些工人(例如蜜蜂)在给定的任务中比其他工人更成功,因此产生了可靠性测量。关于工人可靠性的答案聚合被认为是传统多数投票的合适替代品。我们使用两个真实世界的数据集比较了REBECO和多数投票。结果表明,REBECO能够显著优于MV。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Bee Colony Based Worker Reliability Estimation Algorithm in Microtask Crowdsourcing
Estimation of worker reliability on microtask crowdsourcing platforms has gained attention from many researchers. On microtask platforms no worker is fully reliable for a task and it is likely that some workers are spammers, in the sense that they provide a random answer to collect the financial reward. Existence of spammers is harmful as they increase the cost of microtasking and will negatively affect the answer aggregation process. Hence, to discriminate spammers and non-spammers one needs to measure worker reliability to predict how likely that a worker put an effort in solving a task. In this paper we introduce a new reliability estimation algorithm works based on bee colony algorithm called REBECO. This algorithm relies on Gaussian process model to estimate reliability of workers dynamically. With bees that go in search of pollen, some are more successful than the others. This maps well to our problem, where some workers (i.e., bees) are more successful than other workers for a given task thus, giving rise to a reliability measure. Answer aggregation with respect to worker reliability rates has been considered as a suitable replacement for conventional majority voting. We compared REBECO with majority voting using two real world datasets. The results indicate that REBECO is able to outperform MV significantly.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信