具有视频的IP语音网络的QoS评价:一个案例研究

Nicholas J De Cristofaro, Geoff McGill, Afrim Sallahi, Matt Davis, A. Alsibai, M. St-Hilaire
{"title":"具有视频的IP语音网络的QoS评价:一个案例研究","authors":"Nicholas J De Cristofaro, Geoff McGill, Afrim Sallahi, Matt Davis, A. Alsibai, M. St-Hilaire","doi":"10.1109/CCECE.2009.5090139","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this paper, we evaluate the effect of different queueing disciplines and different codecs on a voice over IP (VoIP) network with video (also known as video conference). A real network topology is implemented using Cisco equipment. Experimental results show that low latency queueing (LLQ) and AutoQoS can provide significant improvements over FIFO in terms of delay, jitter and reserved bandwidth for a VoIP call with video. As far as codecs are concerned, they are suitable for different scenarios. It's for certain that G.729 helps when low bandwidth is a must but, without any QoS parameters in place, codecs do not make a good enough difference for acceptable call quality on a congested network.","PeriodicalId":153464,"journal":{"name":"2009 Canadian Conference on Electrical and Computer Engineering","volume":"19 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2009-05-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"12","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"QoS evaluation of a voice over IP network with video: A case study\",\"authors\":\"Nicholas J De Cristofaro, Geoff McGill, Afrim Sallahi, Matt Davis, A. Alsibai, M. St-Hilaire\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/CCECE.2009.5090139\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In this paper, we evaluate the effect of different queueing disciplines and different codecs on a voice over IP (VoIP) network with video (also known as video conference). A real network topology is implemented using Cisco equipment. Experimental results show that low latency queueing (LLQ) and AutoQoS can provide significant improvements over FIFO in terms of delay, jitter and reserved bandwidth for a VoIP call with video. As far as codecs are concerned, they are suitable for different scenarios. It's for certain that G.729 helps when low bandwidth is a must but, without any QoS parameters in place, codecs do not make a good enough difference for acceptable call quality on a congested network.\",\"PeriodicalId\":153464,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2009 Canadian Conference on Electrical and Computer Engineering\",\"volume\":\"19 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2009-05-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"12\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2009 Canadian Conference on Electrical and Computer Engineering\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/CCECE.2009.5090139\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2009 Canadian Conference on Electrical and Computer Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/CCECE.2009.5090139","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 12

摘要

在本文中,我们评估了不同的排队规则和不同的编解码器对具有视频(也称为视频会议)的IP语音(VoIP)网络的影响。使用Cisco设备实现真实的网络拓扑。实验结果表明,低延迟队列(LLQ)和AutoQoS可以在具有视频的VoIP呼叫的延迟,抖动和保留带宽方面比FIFO提供显着改进。就编解码器而言,它们适用于不同的场景。可以肯定的是,当低带宽是必须的时候,G.729是有帮助的,但是,如果没有任何QoS参数,编解码器在拥挤的网络上对可接受的通话质量没有足够的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
QoS evaluation of a voice over IP network with video: A case study
In this paper, we evaluate the effect of different queueing disciplines and different codecs on a voice over IP (VoIP) network with video (also known as video conference). A real network topology is implemented using Cisco equipment. Experimental results show that low latency queueing (LLQ) and AutoQoS can provide significant improvements over FIFO in terms of delay, jitter and reserved bandwidth for a VoIP call with video. As far as codecs are concerned, they are suitable for different scenarios. It's for certain that G.729 helps when low bandwidth is a must but, without any QoS parameters in place, codecs do not make a good enough difference for acceptable call quality on a congested network.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信