改进的背包密码分析

Ashish Jain, N. Chaudhari
{"title":"改进的背包密码分析","authors":"Ashish Jain, N. Chaudhari","doi":"10.1109/IC3.2015.7346740","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Computational complexity of order 256n to solve the knapsack cipher 0/255 (or improved knapsack cipher) recently suggested by Pham is optimistic result. In this paper, we systematically analyze the improved knapsack cipher in relation to the complexity claims. During the analysis of the improved knapsack cipher, we examined that the public key size must be large to satisfy the constraint of complexity. Though we chose keys of large sizes, the improved knapsack cipher is not safe and its security is compromised by lattice-based attacks. Furthermore, the cipher lost its practicality, since the use of large size public keys. Hence, we identify a construction of practical knapsack cipher 0/f, characterize its requirements and demonstrate asymptotically, that the computational complexity of the knapsack cipher 0/f and knapsack cipher 0/1 (basic or sum-of-subset cipher) is equal. It is worth pointing out that the proposed knapsack cipher 0/f is a compact and viable option to use as a building block for security purpose in resource-constrained devices such as RFID tags, smart cards and the like.","PeriodicalId":217950,"journal":{"name":"2015 Eighth International Conference on Contemporary Computing (IC3)","volume":"74 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-08-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Analysis of the improved knapsack cipher\",\"authors\":\"Ashish Jain, N. Chaudhari\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/IC3.2015.7346740\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Computational complexity of order 256n to solve the knapsack cipher 0/255 (or improved knapsack cipher) recently suggested by Pham is optimistic result. In this paper, we systematically analyze the improved knapsack cipher in relation to the complexity claims. During the analysis of the improved knapsack cipher, we examined that the public key size must be large to satisfy the constraint of complexity. Though we chose keys of large sizes, the improved knapsack cipher is not safe and its security is compromised by lattice-based attacks. Furthermore, the cipher lost its practicality, since the use of large size public keys. Hence, we identify a construction of practical knapsack cipher 0/f, characterize its requirements and demonstrate asymptotically, that the computational complexity of the knapsack cipher 0/f and knapsack cipher 0/1 (basic or sum-of-subset cipher) is equal. It is worth pointing out that the proposed knapsack cipher 0/f is a compact and viable option to use as a building block for security purpose in resource-constrained devices such as RFID tags, smart cards and the like.\",\"PeriodicalId\":217950,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2015 Eighth International Conference on Contemporary Computing (IC3)\",\"volume\":\"74 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2015-08-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2015 Eighth International Conference on Contemporary Computing (IC3)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/IC3.2015.7346740\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2015 Eighth International Conference on Contemporary Computing (IC3)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/IC3.2015.7346740","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

Pham最近提出的背包密码0/255(或改进背包密码)的计算复杂度为256n阶,是乐观的结果。本文系统地分析了改进的背包密码与复杂度声明的关系。在对改进的背包密码进行分析时,我们考察了公钥的大小必须很大才能满足复杂度的约束。虽然我们选择了大尺寸的密钥,但改进的背包密码并不安全,并且其安全性受到基于格的攻击。此外,由于使用了大尺寸的公钥,该密码失去了实用性。因此,我们确定了一个实用的背包密码0/f的构造,描述了它的要求,并渐近地证明了背包密码0/f和背包密码0/1(基本或子集和密码)的计算复杂度相等。值得指出的是,所提出的背包密码0/f是一种紧凑而可行的选择,可以用作资源受限设备(如RFID标签、智能卡等)中安全目的的构建块。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Analysis of the improved knapsack cipher
Computational complexity of order 256n to solve the knapsack cipher 0/255 (or improved knapsack cipher) recently suggested by Pham is optimistic result. In this paper, we systematically analyze the improved knapsack cipher in relation to the complexity claims. During the analysis of the improved knapsack cipher, we examined that the public key size must be large to satisfy the constraint of complexity. Though we chose keys of large sizes, the improved knapsack cipher is not safe and its security is compromised by lattice-based attacks. Furthermore, the cipher lost its practicality, since the use of large size public keys. Hence, we identify a construction of practical knapsack cipher 0/f, characterize its requirements and demonstrate asymptotically, that the computational complexity of the knapsack cipher 0/f and knapsack cipher 0/1 (basic or sum-of-subset cipher) is equal. It is worth pointing out that the proposed knapsack cipher 0/f is a compact and viable option to use as a building block for security purpose in resource-constrained devices such as RFID tags, smart cards and the like.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信