比例公平算法吞吐量平均方法在室内移动网络中的性能评价

V. Stoynov, Z. Valkova-Jarvis
{"title":"比例公平算法吞吐量平均方法在室内移动网络中的性能评价","authors":"V. Stoynov, Z. Valkova-Jarvis","doi":"10.1109/TELSKS.2017.8246270","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Intelligent radio resource distribution techniques play an important role in improving the overall performance of next-generation networks. An efficient scheduling algorithm can help to achieve higher data rates, lower latency and increased fairness for users. This paper evaluates the performance of an indoor network, simulated using the Realistic Indoor Environment Generator (RIEG), when 11 different Throughput Averaging Methods (TAMs) for the Proportional Fair (PF) algorithm are used. The TAMs are compared by using a Comparative Factor (CF) that simultaneously takes into account the average throughput of the indoors users, the fairness and the outage ratio. Simulation results show that when improvement in fairness is the main goal, the recently-proposed low-complexity Median Method (MM) and Quartile Mean Method (QMM) are major rivals to the widely-used Arithmetic Mean Method (AMM) and Original Mean Method (OMM), while the Modified Quartile Mean Method (MQMM) is the leader when the average throughput of indoor users is the most important factor.","PeriodicalId":206778,"journal":{"name":"2017 13th International Conference on Advanced Technologies, Systems and Services in Telecommunications (TELSIKS)","volume":"70 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Performance evaluation of throughput averaging methods for the proportional fair algorithm in indoor mobile networks\",\"authors\":\"V. Stoynov, Z. Valkova-Jarvis\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/TELSKS.2017.8246270\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Intelligent radio resource distribution techniques play an important role in improving the overall performance of next-generation networks. An efficient scheduling algorithm can help to achieve higher data rates, lower latency and increased fairness for users. This paper evaluates the performance of an indoor network, simulated using the Realistic Indoor Environment Generator (RIEG), when 11 different Throughput Averaging Methods (TAMs) for the Proportional Fair (PF) algorithm are used. The TAMs are compared by using a Comparative Factor (CF) that simultaneously takes into account the average throughput of the indoors users, the fairness and the outage ratio. Simulation results show that when improvement in fairness is the main goal, the recently-proposed low-complexity Median Method (MM) and Quartile Mean Method (QMM) are major rivals to the widely-used Arithmetic Mean Method (AMM) and Original Mean Method (OMM), while the Modified Quartile Mean Method (MQMM) is the leader when the average throughput of indoor users is the most important factor.\",\"PeriodicalId\":206778,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2017 13th International Conference on Advanced Technologies, Systems and Services in Telecommunications (TELSIKS)\",\"volume\":\"70 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2017 13th International Conference on Advanced Technologies, Systems and Services in Telecommunications (TELSIKS)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/TELSKS.2017.8246270\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2017 13th International Conference on Advanced Technologies, Systems and Services in Telecommunications (TELSIKS)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/TELSKS.2017.8246270","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

智能无线资源分配技术在提高下一代网络的整体性能方面发挥着重要作用。高效的调度算法可以帮助实现更高的数据速率、更低的延迟和更高的用户公平性。本文评估了一个室内网络的性能,使用现实室内环境发生器(RIEG)模拟,当比例公平(PF)算法使用11种不同的吞吐量平均方法(tam)时。通过使用比较因子(CF)对tam进行比较,该因子同时考虑了室内用户的平均吞吐量、公平性和中断率。仿真结果表明,当以提高公平性为主要目标时,最近提出的低复杂度中值法(MM)和四分位数均值法(QMM)是广泛使用的算术平均法(AMM)和原始均值法(OMM)的主要竞争对手,而当室内用户的平均吞吐量是最重要的因素时,修正四分位数均值法(MQMM)是领先者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Performance evaluation of throughput averaging methods for the proportional fair algorithm in indoor mobile networks
Intelligent radio resource distribution techniques play an important role in improving the overall performance of next-generation networks. An efficient scheduling algorithm can help to achieve higher data rates, lower latency and increased fairness for users. This paper evaluates the performance of an indoor network, simulated using the Realistic Indoor Environment Generator (RIEG), when 11 different Throughput Averaging Methods (TAMs) for the Proportional Fair (PF) algorithm are used. The TAMs are compared by using a Comparative Factor (CF) that simultaneously takes into account the average throughput of the indoors users, the fairness and the outage ratio. Simulation results show that when improvement in fairness is the main goal, the recently-proposed low-complexity Median Method (MM) and Quartile Mean Method (QMM) are major rivals to the widely-used Arithmetic Mean Method (AMM) and Original Mean Method (OMM), while the Modified Quartile Mean Method (MQMM) is the leader when the average throughput of indoor users is the most important factor.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信