阻垢剂鉴定新方法经现场试验验证

A. Halvorsen, K. Reiersolmoen, K. S. Andersen, A. Brurås, A. Sylte, Ø. Birketveit, R. Evjenth, M. H. D. Plessis
{"title":"阻垢剂鉴定新方法经现场试验验证","authors":"A. Halvorsen, K. Reiersolmoen, K. S. Andersen, A. Brurås, A. Sylte, Ø. Birketveit, R. Evjenth, M. H. D. Plessis","doi":"10.2118/190741-MS","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n A new laboratory test method for qualification of scale inhibitors for carbonate, sulphate and sulphide scale has been demonstrated. The new method reflected conditions at the first stage separator at Gullfaks A in a more realistic way than by use of the more common dynamic tube blocking test. Results of this method have been compared with dynamic tube blocking and static scale inhibition tests and a full-scale field test.\n The method developed includes iron particles, realistic H2S and CO2 pressures under anaerobic conditions allowing water chemistry similar to field conditions. The method can be utilised for water with carbonate or sulphate scale potential or a mix. A pH closer to system conditions and scaling on surfaces can be achieved without adjustment of the water composition. The residence time can be up to 5 minutes, which typically represent the residence time in for example separators. The results are interpreted through visual observations through glass coils and Scanning Electron Microscopy with Energy Dispersive Spectroscopy (SEM/EDS) analyses of steel coils.\n Using the new method, significant scale was formed when the incumbent scale inhibitor was tested which was also observed in the field. Several alternative scale inhibitor chemistries were recommended for evaluation based on environmental properties, field experience and cost efficiency. When testing the chemistries with the new method only one inhibitor gave acceptable results (no scaling nor co-precipitation of scale and scale inhibitor). This inhibitor was recommended for further testing in a two-week field test. The field test included quantification of suspended solids and a filter rig test. The results from the field test confirmed the laboratory results showing that the selected inhibitor was more efficient than the incumbent.","PeriodicalId":445983,"journal":{"name":"Day 1 Wed, June 20, 2018","volume":"235 1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-06-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"New Test Method for Scale Inhibitor Qualification Verified by Field Testing\",\"authors\":\"A. Halvorsen, K. Reiersolmoen, K. S. Andersen, A. Brurås, A. Sylte, Ø. Birketveit, R. Evjenth, M. H. D. Plessis\",\"doi\":\"10.2118/190741-MS\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n A new laboratory test method for qualification of scale inhibitors for carbonate, sulphate and sulphide scale has been demonstrated. The new method reflected conditions at the first stage separator at Gullfaks A in a more realistic way than by use of the more common dynamic tube blocking test. Results of this method have been compared with dynamic tube blocking and static scale inhibition tests and a full-scale field test.\\n The method developed includes iron particles, realistic H2S and CO2 pressures under anaerobic conditions allowing water chemistry similar to field conditions. The method can be utilised for water with carbonate or sulphate scale potential or a mix. A pH closer to system conditions and scaling on surfaces can be achieved without adjustment of the water composition. The residence time can be up to 5 minutes, which typically represent the residence time in for example separators. The results are interpreted through visual observations through glass coils and Scanning Electron Microscopy with Energy Dispersive Spectroscopy (SEM/EDS) analyses of steel coils.\\n Using the new method, significant scale was formed when the incumbent scale inhibitor was tested which was also observed in the field. Several alternative scale inhibitor chemistries were recommended for evaluation based on environmental properties, field experience and cost efficiency. When testing the chemistries with the new method only one inhibitor gave acceptable results (no scaling nor co-precipitation of scale and scale inhibitor). This inhibitor was recommended for further testing in a two-week field test. The field test included quantification of suspended solids and a filter rig test. The results from the field test confirmed the laboratory results showing that the selected inhibitor was more efficient than the incumbent.\",\"PeriodicalId\":445983,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Day 1 Wed, June 20, 2018\",\"volume\":\"235 1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-06-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Day 1 Wed, June 20, 2018\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2118/190741-MS\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Day 1 Wed, June 20, 2018","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2118/190741-MS","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

介绍了一种新的室内测试方法,用于碳酸盐、硫酸盐和硫化物阻垢剂的鉴定。与使用更常见的动态管阻塞测试相比,新方法更真实地反映了Gullfaks A第一级分离器的情况。将该方法的结果与动态堵管和静态阻垢试验以及全尺寸现场试验进行了比较。开发的方法包括铁颗粒,厌氧条件下的实际H2S和CO2压力,使水化学与现场条件相似。该方法可用于具有碳酸盐或硫酸盐水垢电位或混合物的水。在不调整水成分的情况下,可以获得更接近系统条件和表面结垢的pH值。停留时间最多可达5分钟,这通常表示例如分离器中的停留时间。结果通过玻璃线圈的视觉观察和钢线圈的扫描电子显微镜与能量色散光谱(SEM/EDS)分析来解释。使用新方法,在测试现有阻垢剂时形成了显著的结垢,并且在现场也观察到了这一点。根据环境特性、现场经验和成本效益,推荐了几种替代阻垢剂进行评估。当用新方法测试化学成分时,只有一种缓蚀剂给出了可接受的结果(没有结垢,也没有垢和缓蚀剂的共沉淀)。该抑制剂被推荐进行为期两周的现场测试。现场测试包括悬浮固体的量化和过滤装置测试。现场测试结果证实了实验室结果,表明所选抑制剂比现有抑制剂更有效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
New Test Method for Scale Inhibitor Qualification Verified by Field Testing
A new laboratory test method for qualification of scale inhibitors for carbonate, sulphate and sulphide scale has been demonstrated. The new method reflected conditions at the first stage separator at Gullfaks A in a more realistic way than by use of the more common dynamic tube blocking test. Results of this method have been compared with dynamic tube blocking and static scale inhibition tests and a full-scale field test. The method developed includes iron particles, realistic H2S and CO2 pressures under anaerobic conditions allowing water chemistry similar to field conditions. The method can be utilised for water with carbonate or sulphate scale potential or a mix. A pH closer to system conditions and scaling on surfaces can be achieved without adjustment of the water composition. The residence time can be up to 5 minutes, which typically represent the residence time in for example separators. The results are interpreted through visual observations through glass coils and Scanning Electron Microscopy with Energy Dispersive Spectroscopy (SEM/EDS) analyses of steel coils. Using the new method, significant scale was formed when the incumbent scale inhibitor was tested which was also observed in the field. Several alternative scale inhibitor chemistries were recommended for evaluation based on environmental properties, field experience and cost efficiency. When testing the chemistries with the new method only one inhibitor gave acceptable results (no scaling nor co-precipitation of scale and scale inhibitor). This inhibitor was recommended for further testing in a two-week field test. The field test included quantification of suspended solids and a filter rig test. The results from the field test confirmed the laboratory results showing that the selected inhibitor was more efficient than the incumbent.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信