在it公司中选择scrum或看板方法进行项目管理

I. Zasornova, S. Lysenko, Oleksandr Zasornov
{"title":"在it公司中选择scrum或看板方法进行项目管理","authors":"I. Zasornova, S. Lysenko, Oleksandr Zasornov","doi":"10.31891/csit-2022-4-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Taking into account the conditions of the functioning of modern business, it is necessary to take into account the constant changes that occur in the process of developing projects in IT companies. Therefore, when creating projects, there is a need for a well-founded choice of project management methodologies, which will allow to quickly solve problems that arise in the process of their creation and will provide an opportunity to ensure high efficiency of project-oriented activities of companies. \nThe conducted analysis of the methodologies showed that today there are a sufficient number of them, among which there are rigid and flexible ones. Among the hard methodologies, as Waterfall model, V-model, Incremental model, Spiral model, and Iterative model are known. Among flexible methodologies, the Agile model, as well as Scrum and Kanban are most often used. The following flexible methodologies are also known: Lean, eXtreme Programming (XP), Rational Unified Process (RUP), Dynamic Systems Development Model (DSDM), Rapid Application Development (RAD), and Extreme Programming (XP). \nIt has been determined that most researchers prove in their studies that agile methodologies are more widespread nowadays and are better adapted to the conditions of rapid changes in projects. The only exceptions are those methodologies that apply to certain industries, such as medical, aviation, and others. Such fields involve the use of only brutal methodologies. \nThe article examines the modern Agile approach to project management, its difference from the traditional approach of the rigid Waterfall methodology or others; the scope of application of Agile; a short story; the advantages and disadvantages of implementation and its use. \nThe article provides a comparative analysis of the most popular today's flexible Scrum and Kanban methodologies. The roles that are indicated in projects in Scrum and Kanban are considered. The events performed by the teams are also analyzed in more detail. \nThe article elaborates a block diagram for a justified choice of Scrum or Kanban methodology. The article is based on research on the international and Ukrainian markets of IT companies. \nThe direction of future research of the authors is to conduct a more detailed analysis and comparison of rigid and flexible methodologies with the aim of using combined forms of project management.","PeriodicalId":353631,"journal":{"name":"Computer systems and information technologies","volume":"105 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"CHOOSING SCRUM OR KANBAN METHODOLOGY FOR PROJECT MANAGEMENT IN IT COMPANIES\",\"authors\":\"I. Zasornova, S. Lysenko, Oleksandr Zasornov\",\"doi\":\"10.31891/csit-2022-4-1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Taking into account the conditions of the functioning of modern business, it is necessary to take into account the constant changes that occur in the process of developing projects in IT companies. Therefore, when creating projects, there is a need for a well-founded choice of project management methodologies, which will allow to quickly solve problems that arise in the process of their creation and will provide an opportunity to ensure high efficiency of project-oriented activities of companies. \\nThe conducted analysis of the methodologies showed that today there are a sufficient number of them, among which there are rigid and flexible ones. Among the hard methodologies, as Waterfall model, V-model, Incremental model, Spiral model, and Iterative model are known. Among flexible methodologies, the Agile model, as well as Scrum and Kanban are most often used. The following flexible methodologies are also known: Lean, eXtreme Programming (XP), Rational Unified Process (RUP), Dynamic Systems Development Model (DSDM), Rapid Application Development (RAD), and Extreme Programming (XP). \\nIt has been determined that most researchers prove in their studies that agile methodologies are more widespread nowadays and are better adapted to the conditions of rapid changes in projects. The only exceptions are those methodologies that apply to certain industries, such as medical, aviation, and others. Such fields involve the use of only brutal methodologies. \\nThe article examines the modern Agile approach to project management, its difference from the traditional approach of the rigid Waterfall methodology or others; the scope of application of Agile; a short story; the advantages and disadvantages of implementation and its use. \\nThe article provides a comparative analysis of the most popular today's flexible Scrum and Kanban methodologies. The roles that are indicated in projects in Scrum and Kanban are considered. The events performed by the teams are also analyzed in more detail. \\nThe article elaborates a block diagram for a justified choice of Scrum or Kanban methodology. The article is based on research on the international and Ukrainian markets of IT companies. \\nThe direction of future research of the authors is to conduct a more detailed analysis and comparison of rigid and flexible methodologies with the aim of using combined forms of project management.\",\"PeriodicalId\":353631,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Computer systems and information technologies\",\"volume\":\"105 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-12-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Computer systems and information technologies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.31891/csit-2022-4-1\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Computer systems and information technologies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31891/csit-2022-4-1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

考虑到现代商业运作的条件,有必要考虑到在it公司开发项目过程中发生的不断变化。因此,在创建项目时,需要一个有充分根据的项目管理方法的选择,这将允许快速解决在创建过程中出现的问题,并将提供一个机会,以确保公司的项目导向活动的高效率。对这些方法进行的分析表明,今天的方法已经足够多了,其中既有刚性的,也有柔性的。在硬方法中,瀑布模型、v模型、增量模型、螺旋模型和迭代模型是众所周知的。在灵活的方法论中,敏捷模型,以及Scrum和看板是最常用的。下面这些灵活的方法也是众所周知的:精益、极限编程(XP)、Rational统一过程(RUP)、动态系统开发模型(DSDM)、快速应用程序开发(RAD)和极限编程(XP)。已经确定,大多数研究人员在他们的研究中证明了敏捷方法在当今更加广泛,并且更好地适应项目中快速变化的条件。唯一的例外是那些适用于某些行业的方法,如医疗、航空和其他行业。这些领域只涉及使用残酷的方法。本文考察了项目管理的现代敏捷方法,它与传统的僵化的瀑布方法或其他方法的区别;敏捷的应用范围;短篇小说;实现及其使用的优点和缺点。本文对当今最流行的灵活的Scrum和看板方法进行了比较分析。在Scrum和看板中,项目中指示的角色被考虑在内。还对团队执行的事件进行了更详细的分析。这篇文章详细阐述了一个框图,说明了Scrum或看板方法的合理选择。本文是基于对国际和乌克兰IT公司市场的研究。作者未来的研究方向是对刚性和柔性方法进行更详细的分析和比较,目的是使用组合形式的项目管理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
CHOOSING SCRUM OR KANBAN METHODOLOGY FOR PROJECT MANAGEMENT IN IT COMPANIES
Taking into account the conditions of the functioning of modern business, it is necessary to take into account the constant changes that occur in the process of developing projects in IT companies. Therefore, when creating projects, there is a need for a well-founded choice of project management methodologies, which will allow to quickly solve problems that arise in the process of their creation and will provide an opportunity to ensure high efficiency of project-oriented activities of companies. The conducted analysis of the methodologies showed that today there are a sufficient number of them, among which there are rigid and flexible ones. Among the hard methodologies, as Waterfall model, V-model, Incremental model, Spiral model, and Iterative model are known. Among flexible methodologies, the Agile model, as well as Scrum and Kanban are most often used. The following flexible methodologies are also known: Lean, eXtreme Programming (XP), Rational Unified Process (RUP), Dynamic Systems Development Model (DSDM), Rapid Application Development (RAD), and Extreme Programming (XP). It has been determined that most researchers prove in their studies that agile methodologies are more widespread nowadays and are better adapted to the conditions of rapid changes in projects. The only exceptions are those methodologies that apply to certain industries, such as medical, aviation, and others. Such fields involve the use of only brutal methodologies. The article examines the modern Agile approach to project management, its difference from the traditional approach of the rigid Waterfall methodology or others; the scope of application of Agile; a short story; the advantages and disadvantages of implementation and its use. The article provides a comparative analysis of the most popular today's flexible Scrum and Kanban methodologies. The roles that are indicated in projects in Scrum and Kanban are considered. The events performed by the teams are also analyzed in more detail. The article elaborates a block diagram for a justified choice of Scrum or Kanban methodology. The article is based on research on the international and Ukrainian markets of IT companies. The direction of future research of the authors is to conduct a more detailed analysis and comparison of rigid and flexible methodologies with the aim of using combined forms of project management.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信