矢状带损伤的外科治疗及手术表现分类

K. Lee, Cheon Ho Song, Jin Soo Kim, S. Koh, Dong Chul Lee, S. Roh, Jung Hyun Park
{"title":"矢状带损伤的外科治疗及手术表现分类","authors":"K. Lee, Cheon Ho Song, Jin Soo Kim, S. Koh, Dong Chul Lee, S. Roh, Jung Hyun Park","doi":"10.12790/ahm.21.0135","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose: The indications for surgery in patients with acute closed sagittal band injuries are still undecided. The purpose of this study is to classify the types of injuries based on intraoperative findings of patients who underwent surgery for sagittal injury, and to present treatment plans and surgical methods.Methods: Twenty-five patients who had undergone surgical exploration for closed sagittal band injury between January 2011 and December 2020 were included in the study, comprising of 17 patients with acute injury within 3 weeks, four patients with chronic injury, and four patients who underwent surgery because symptoms did not improve during conservative treatment were included. Patients with laceration, fracture, and rheumatoid arthritis were excluded. Results: Sagittal band injury was classified into two groups: superficial sagittal band (SSB) injury and proper sagittal band (PSB) injury. SSB injury was observed in 75.0% of spontaneous rupture cases and PSB injury was observed in 66.7% of traumatic rupture cases. SSB injury was observed in 83.3% of Rayan and Murray classification type II cases and PSB injury was observed in 61.5% of type III cases (p=0.041). All four patients who failed conservative treatment and underwent surgery had PSB injuries.Conclusion: We successfully corrected the sagittal band injury with extensor digitorum communis tendon instability through surgical treatment. Sagittal band injury can be classified into two types depending on the anatomical injury pattern; SSB and PSB injuries. Surgical method and treatment plan can be chosen based on this.","PeriodicalId":137349,"journal":{"name":"Archives of Hand and Microsurgery","volume":"7 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-11-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Surgical treatment of sagittal band injury and classification according to operative findings\",\"authors\":\"K. Lee, Cheon Ho Song, Jin Soo Kim, S. Koh, Dong Chul Lee, S. Roh, Jung Hyun Park\",\"doi\":\"10.12790/ahm.21.0135\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Purpose: The indications for surgery in patients with acute closed sagittal band injuries are still undecided. The purpose of this study is to classify the types of injuries based on intraoperative findings of patients who underwent surgery for sagittal injury, and to present treatment plans and surgical methods.Methods: Twenty-five patients who had undergone surgical exploration for closed sagittal band injury between January 2011 and December 2020 were included in the study, comprising of 17 patients with acute injury within 3 weeks, four patients with chronic injury, and four patients who underwent surgery because symptoms did not improve during conservative treatment were included. Patients with laceration, fracture, and rheumatoid arthritis were excluded. Results: Sagittal band injury was classified into two groups: superficial sagittal band (SSB) injury and proper sagittal band (PSB) injury. SSB injury was observed in 75.0% of spontaneous rupture cases and PSB injury was observed in 66.7% of traumatic rupture cases. SSB injury was observed in 83.3% of Rayan and Murray classification type II cases and PSB injury was observed in 61.5% of type III cases (p=0.041). All four patients who failed conservative treatment and underwent surgery had PSB injuries.Conclusion: We successfully corrected the sagittal band injury with extensor digitorum communis tendon instability through surgical treatment. Sagittal band injury can be classified into two types depending on the anatomical injury pattern; SSB and PSB injuries. Surgical method and treatment plan can be chosen based on this.\",\"PeriodicalId\":137349,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Archives of Hand and Microsurgery\",\"volume\":\"7 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-11-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Archives of Hand and Microsurgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.12790/ahm.21.0135\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of Hand and Microsurgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12790/ahm.21.0135","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:急性闭合性矢状带损伤的手术适应证尚不明确。本研究的目的是根据矢状面损伤手术患者的术中表现对损伤类型进行分类,并提出治疗方案和手术方法。方法:纳入2011年1月至2020年12月间行闭合性矢状带损伤手术探查的患者25例,其中急性损伤3周内17例,慢性损伤4例,保守治疗期间症状未改善而行手术的患者4例。排除有撕裂伤、骨折和类风湿关节炎的患者。结果:矢状带损伤分为浅状矢状带(SSB)损伤和固有矢状带(PSB)损伤。自发性破裂75.0%发生SSB损伤,外伤性破裂66.7%发生PSB损伤。Rayan和Murray分类ⅱ型患者中SSB损伤发生率为83.3%,ⅲ型患者中PSB损伤发生率为61.5% (p=0.041)。所有4例保守治疗失败并接受手术的患者均有PSB损伤。结论:通过手术治疗,我们成功地矫正了矢状带损伤合并趾共伸肌腱不稳。矢状带损伤根据解剖损伤类型可分为两种类型;SSB和PSB损伤。在此基础上选择手术方法和治疗方案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Surgical treatment of sagittal band injury and classification according to operative findings
Purpose: The indications for surgery in patients with acute closed sagittal band injuries are still undecided. The purpose of this study is to classify the types of injuries based on intraoperative findings of patients who underwent surgery for sagittal injury, and to present treatment plans and surgical methods.Methods: Twenty-five patients who had undergone surgical exploration for closed sagittal band injury between January 2011 and December 2020 were included in the study, comprising of 17 patients with acute injury within 3 weeks, four patients with chronic injury, and four patients who underwent surgery because symptoms did not improve during conservative treatment were included. Patients with laceration, fracture, and rheumatoid arthritis were excluded. Results: Sagittal band injury was classified into two groups: superficial sagittal band (SSB) injury and proper sagittal band (PSB) injury. SSB injury was observed in 75.0% of spontaneous rupture cases and PSB injury was observed in 66.7% of traumatic rupture cases. SSB injury was observed in 83.3% of Rayan and Murray classification type II cases and PSB injury was observed in 61.5% of type III cases (p=0.041). All four patients who failed conservative treatment and underwent surgery had PSB injuries.Conclusion: We successfully corrected the sagittal band injury with extensor digitorum communis tendon instability through surgical treatment. Sagittal band injury can be classified into two types depending on the anatomical injury pattern; SSB and PSB injuries. Surgical method and treatment plan can be chosen based on this.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信