{"title":"移民法律的正当程序缺陷与权力至上的坚持","authors":"C. Rosenbaum","doi":"10.15779/Z38HQ3RZ6W","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................... 119 I. Detention of Asylum Seekers ............................................................................... 120 II. Substantive Due Process Rights of Noncitizens ................................................. 125 A. Zadvydas v. Davis and Clark v. Martinez ............................................ 126 1. Zadvydas v. Davis ......................................................................... 126 2. Clark v. Martinez ........................................................................... 128 B. Rodriguez-Fernandez v. Wilkinson ..................................................... 129 C. Demore v. Kim .................................................................................... 130 D. Jennings v. Rodriguez .......................................................................... 132 III. R.I.L-R—Substantive Due Process Asylum Seekers—Immigration Detention Cannot Be Punishment ................................................................ 138 IV. Non-Immigration Civil and Criminal Preventive Detention ............................. 141 V. The Plenary Power Doctrine and Systemic Racial Bias—Asylum Seekers in Detention ..................................................................................................... 143 A. Immigration Law and History of Mistreatment of Central American and Mexican Immigrants..................................................... 143 B. The Plenary Power Doctrine’s Role in Immigration Racial Classifications ...................................................................................... 151 VI. Mainstreaming Constitutional Procedural Due Process – Disaggregation and Rule of Law .......................................................................................... 152 A. Rule of Law and Disaggregating Immigration Law Along Criminal Immigration Lines ............................................................................... 153 CONCLUSION ....................................................................................................... 156","PeriodicalId":408518,"journal":{"name":"Berkeley La Raza Law Journal","volume":"104 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-05-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Immigration Law's Due Process Deficit and the Persistence of Plenary Power\",\"authors\":\"C. Rosenbaum\",\"doi\":\"10.15779/Z38HQ3RZ6W\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................... 119 I. Detention of Asylum Seekers ............................................................................... 120 II. Substantive Due Process Rights of Noncitizens ................................................. 125 A. Zadvydas v. Davis and Clark v. Martinez ............................................ 126 1. Zadvydas v. Davis ......................................................................... 126 2. Clark v. Martinez ........................................................................... 128 B. Rodriguez-Fernandez v. Wilkinson ..................................................... 129 C. Demore v. Kim .................................................................................... 130 D. Jennings v. Rodriguez .......................................................................... 132 III. R.I.L-R—Substantive Due Process Asylum Seekers—Immigration Detention Cannot Be Punishment ................................................................ 138 IV. Non-Immigration Civil and Criminal Preventive Detention ............................. 141 V. The Plenary Power Doctrine and Systemic Racial Bias—Asylum Seekers in Detention ..................................................................................................... 143 A. Immigration Law and History of Mistreatment of Central American and Mexican Immigrants..................................................... 143 B. The Plenary Power Doctrine’s Role in Immigration Racial Classifications ...................................................................................... 151 VI. Mainstreaming Constitutional Procedural Due Process – Disaggregation and Rule of Law .......................................................................................... 152 A. Rule of Law and Disaggregating Immigration Law Along Criminal Immigration Lines ............................................................................... 153 CONCLUSION ....................................................................................................... 156\",\"PeriodicalId\":408518,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Berkeley La Raza Law Journal\",\"volume\":\"104 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-05-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Berkeley La Raza Law Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.15779/Z38HQ3RZ6W\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Berkeley La Raza Law Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15779/Z38HQ3RZ6W","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3
摘要
INTRODUCTION ...................................................................................................第119的口齿Detention of Asylum Seekers ...............................................................................120二世。另外一件事就Substantive Due Process of Noncitizens .................................................125 A。戴维斯Zadvydas的twm, and克拉克的twm Martinez ............................................是126个。戴维斯Zadvydas的twm .........................................................................126 2。克拉克的twm Martinez ...........................................................................第128 b Rodriguez-Fernandez的twm威尔金森 .....................................................c·Demore 129的twm基姆 ....................................................................................130。d詹宁斯的twm罗德里格斯 ..........................................................................第132三世。R.I.L-R烷基Substantive Due Process Asylum Seekers烷基Immigration Detention我无法Punishment比马” ................................................................138四世。Non-Immigration Civil, and Criminal当中大约Detention .............................多达V。《Plenary Power), and Systemic声明Racial新世界烷基Asylum Seekers打印Detention .....................................................................................................143 A。Immigration阿劳,and墨西哥(英语:反对消失Mistreatment中央美国和的话Immigrants .....................................................143 b。The Plenary缩写«Role操作打印Immigration声明Racial Classifications ......................................................................................微。151 Mainstreaming Constitutional Procedural Due Process烷基Disaggregation, and比如阿劳译本史》(英语) ..........................................................................................第152 A。比如of阿劳,and Disaggregating Immigration阿劳2 Criminal架Immigration Lines ...............................................................................照着CONCLUSION .......................................................................................................156
Immigration Law's Due Process Deficit and the Persistence of Plenary Power
INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................... 119 I. Detention of Asylum Seekers ............................................................................... 120 II. Substantive Due Process Rights of Noncitizens ................................................. 125 A. Zadvydas v. Davis and Clark v. Martinez ............................................ 126 1. Zadvydas v. Davis ......................................................................... 126 2. Clark v. Martinez ........................................................................... 128 B. Rodriguez-Fernandez v. Wilkinson ..................................................... 129 C. Demore v. Kim .................................................................................... 130 D. Jennings v. Rodriguez .......................................................................... 132 III. R.I.L-R—Substantive Due Process Asylum Seekers—Immigration Detention Cannot Be Punishment ................................................................ 138 IV. Non-Immigration Civil and Criminal Preventive Detention ............................. 141 V. The Plenary Power Doctrine and Systemic Racial Bias—Asylum Seekers in Detention ..................................................................................................... 143 A. Immigration Law and History of Mistreatment of Central American and Mexican Immigrants..................................................... 143 B. The Plenary Power Doctrine’s Role in Immigration Racial Classifications ...................................................................................... 151 VI. Mainstreaming Constitutional Procedural Due Process – Disaggregation and Rule of Law .......................................................................................... 152 A. Rule of Law and Disaggregating Immigration Law Along Criminal Immigration Lines ............................................................................... 153 CONCLUSION ....................................................................................................... 156