企业信息安全评估——优先级的重要性

Erik Johansson, Pontus Johnson
{"title":"企业信息安全评估——优先级的重要性","authors":"Erik Johansson, Pontus Johnson","doi":"10.1109/EDOC.2005.9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Assessing the level of information security in an enterprise is a serious challenge for many organizations. This paper considers the prioritization of the field of enterprise information security. The paper thus considers how we may know what parts of information security are important for a company to address and what parts are not. Two methods for prioritization are used. The results demonstrate to what extent different standards committees, guideline authors and expert groups differ in their opinions on what the important issues are in enterprise information security. The ISO/IEC 17799, the NIST SP 800-26, the ISF standards committees, the CMU/SEI OCTAVE framework authors and an expert panel at the Swedish Information Processing Society (DFS) are considered. The differences in prioritization have important consequences on enterprise information security assessments. The effects on the information security assessment results in a European energy company are presented in the paper.","PeriodicalId":106387,"journal":{"name":"Ninth IEEE International EDOC Enterprise Computing Conference (EDOC'05)","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2005-09-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"13","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Assessment of enterprise information security - the importance of prioritization $\",\"authors\":\"Erik Johansson, Pontus Johnson\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/EDOC.2005.9\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Assessing the level of information security in an enterprise is a serious challenge for many organizations. This paper considers the prioritization of the field of enterprise information security. The paper thus considers how we may know what parts of information security are important for a company to address and what parts are not. Two methods for prioritization are used. The results demonstrate to what extent different standards committees, guideline authors and expert groups differ in their opinions on what the important issues are in enterprise information security. The ISO/IEC 17799, the NIST SP 800-26, the ISF standards committees, the CMU/SEI OCTAVE framework authors and an expert panel at the Swedish Information Processing Society (DFS) are considered. The differences in prioritization have important consequences on enterprise information security assessments. The effects on the information security assessment results in a European energy company are presented in the paper.\",\"PeriodicalId\":106387,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ninth IEEE International EDOC Enterprise Computing Conference (EDOC'05)\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2005-09-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"13\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ninth IEEE International EDOC Enterprise Computing Conference (EDOC'05)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/EDOC.2005.9\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ninth IEEE International EDOC Enterprise Computing Conference (EDOC'05)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/EDOC.2005.9","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 13

摘要

评估企业中的信息安全级别是许多组织面临的严峻挑战。本文考虑了企业信息安全领域的优先级问题。因此,本文考虑了我们如何知道信息安全的哪些部分对公司来说是重要的,哪些部分不是。我们使用了两种方法来确定优先级。结果表明,不同的标准委员会、指南作者和专家组在企业信息安全的重要问题上存在多大程度的分歧。考虑到ISO/IEC 17799, NIST SP 800-26, ISF标准委员会,CMU/SEI OCTAVE框架作者和瑞典信息处理协会(DFS)的专家小组。优先级的差异对企业信息安全评估有重要影响。本文介绍了对某欧洲能源公司信息安全评估结果的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Assessment of enterprise information security - the importance of prioritization $
Assessing the level of information security in an enterprise is a serious challenge for many organizations. This paper considers the prioritization of the field of enterprise information security. The paper thus considers how we may know what parts of information security are important for a company to address and what parts are not. Two methods for prioritization are used. The results demonstrate to what extent different standards committees, guideline authors and expert groups differ in their opinions on what the important issues are in enterprise information security. The ISO/IEC 17799, the NIST SP 800-26, the ISF standards committees, the CMU/SEI OCTAVE framework authors and an expert panel at the Swedish Information Processing Society (DFS) are considered. The differences in prioritization have important consequences on enterprise information security assessments. The effects on the information security assessment results in a European energy company are presented in the paper.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信