{"title":"羽化后二甲胺- p的功效和甜菜耐受性","authors":"C. Rice, C. Ransom, J. Ishida","doi":"10.5274/JSBR.39.3.89","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Field experiments were conducted from 1998 to 2000 to evaluate crop tolerance and weed control from dimethenamid-P alone and in tank-mix combinations applied postemergence (POST) to sugarbeet (Beta vulgaris L.) at Ontario, Oregon. In the tolerance trials dimethenamid-P was applied to four- to six-leaf sugarbeet in 1998 and 1999 and to two- to four-leaf sugarbeet in 2000. Significant (P < 0.05) herbicide injury to sugarbeet was observed in 1998 and 2000 at both 12 and 28 days after treatment (DAT). Sugarbeet injury was not significant for any herbicide treatment in 1999. Dimethenamid-P applied at 2.87 kg ha -1 caused the greatest sugarbeet injury in 1998. Injury in 2000 from tank-mix combinations of dimethenamid-P at 0.72 kg ha -1 plus desmedipham-phenmedipham with and without triflusulfuron was greater than from dimethenamid-P at 2.87 kg ha -1 at 12 DAT and similar at 28 DAT. Sugarbeet yield from plots treated with dimethenamid-P at 2.87 kg ha -1 was less than all other treatments in 1998. In 1999, plots treated with dimethenamid-P at 1.43 kg ha -1 produced greater root and estimated recoverable sucrose yields than untreated plots or those treated with dimethenamid-P at 0.72 kg ha -1 . Sugarbeet yields did not differ among treatments in 2000. In the weed control trials dimethenamid-P at 0.72 kg ha -1 was applied to two- to four- or four- to six-leaf sugarbeet. Dimethenamid-P added to desmedipham-phenmedipham increased late season barnyardgrass control by 34 and 32% in 1998 and 1999, respectively. Late season barnyardgrass control increased 22% in 1998 and 85% in 1999 when dimethenamid-P was added to desmedipham-phenmedipham plus triflusulfuron. Sugarbeet root yields in plots treated with POST combinations plus dimethenamid-P ranged from 7.4 to 9.6 Mg ha -1 higher than those same POST combinations without dimethenamid-P in 1998 and 1999. Sugarbeet root yields were greater (P < 0.1) when dimethenamid-P was applied with desmedipham-phenmedipham in 1998 and 1999 and with desmedipham-phenmedipham plus triflusulfuron in 1999. Desmedipham-phenmedipham plus triflusulfuron plus dimethenamid-P applied to two- to four-leaf sugarbeet provided significantly (P < 0.15) greater root yield than the same treatment without dimethenamid-P in 1998. The trend toward higher root yields was likely due to greater redroot pigweed, hairy nightshade, and barnyardgrass control in 1998 and greater barnyardgrass control in 1999 from dimethenamid-P.","PeriodicalId":403165,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Sugarbeet Research","volume":"66 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2002-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Efficacy and sugarbeet tolerance with postemergence dimethenamid-P\",\"authors\":\"C. Rice, C. Ransom, J. Ishida\",\"doi\":\"10.5274/JSBR.39.3.89\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Field experiments were conducted from 1998 to 2000 to evaluate crop tolerance and weed control from dimethenamid-P alone and in tank-mix combinations applied postemergence (POST) to sugarbeet (Beta vulgaris L.) at Ontario, Oregon. In the tolerance trials dimethenamid-P was applied to four- to six-leaf sugarbeet in 1998 and 1999 and to two- to four-leaf sugarbeet in 2000. Significant (P < 0.05) herbicide injury to sugarbeet was observed in 1998 and 2000 at both 12 and 28 days after treatment (DAT). Sugarbeet injury was not significant for any herbicide treatment in 1999. Dimethenamid-P applied at 2.87 kg ha -1 caused the greatest sugarbeet injury in 1998. Injury in 2000 from tank-mix combinations of dimethenamid-P at 0.72 kg ha -1 plus desmedipham-phenmedipham with and without triflusulfuron was greater than from dimethenamid-P at 2.87 kg ha -1 at 12 DAT and similar at 28 DAT. Sugarbeet yield from plots treated with dimethenamid-P at 2.87 kg ha -1 was less than all other treatments in 1998. In 1999, plots treated with dimethenamid-P at 1.43 kg ha -1 produced greater root and estimated recoverable sucrose yields than untreated plots or those treated with dimethenamid-P at 0.72 kg ha -1 . Sugarbeet yields did not differ among treatments in 2000. In the weed control trials dimethenamid-P at 0.72 kg ha -1 was applied to two- to four- or four- to six-leaf sugarbeet. Dimethenamid-P added to desmedipham-phenmedipham increased late season barnyardgrass control by 34 and 32% in 1998 and 1999, respectively. Late season barnyardgrass control increased 22% in 1998 and 85% in 1999 when dimethenamid-P was added to desmedipham-phenmedipham plus triflusulfuron. Sugarbeet root yields in plots treated with POST combinations plus dimethenamid-P ranged from 7.4 to 9.6 Mg ha -1 higher than those same POST combinations without dimethenamid-P in 1998 and 1999. Sugarbeet root yields were greater (P < 0.1) when dimethenamid-P was applied with desmedipham-phenmedipham in 1998 and 1999 and with desmedipham-phenmedipham plus triflusulfuron in 1999. Desmedipham-phenmedipham plus triflusulfuron plus dimethenamid-P applied to two- to four-leaf sugarbeet provided significantly (P < 0.15) greater root yield than the same treatment without dimethenamid-P in 1998. The trend toward higher root yields was likely due to greater redroot pigweed, hairy nightshade, and barnyardgrass control in 1998 and greater barnyardgrass control in 1999 from dimethenamid-P.\",\"PeriodicalId\":403165,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Sugarbeet Research\",\"volume\":\"66 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2002-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"6\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Sugarbeet Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5274/JSBR.39.3.89\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Sugarbeet Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5274/JSBR.39.3.89","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6
摘要
1998 ~ 2000年,在美国俄勒冈州安大略省对甜菜(Beta vulgaris L.)进行了田间试验,评价了羽化后单用和罐中混合二甲胺- p对作物的耐受性和杂草防治效果。在耐受性试验中,二甲基胺- p分别于1998年和1999年施用于四叶至六叶甜菜,2000年施用于二叶至四叶甜菜。1998年和2000年处理后12和28 d,除草剂对甜菜的危害均显著(P < 0.05)。1999年不同除草剂处理对甜菜的危害不显著。1998年施用2.87 kg ha -1的二甲胺- p对甜菜危害最大。2000年,使用0.72公斤公顷-1的二甲胺-p +地米菊-苯米菊加或不加三氟呋虫隆的罐式混合剂造成的伤害大于使用2.87公斤公顷-1的二甲胺-p在12个数据时造成的伤害,在28个数据时造成的伤害相似。1998年,二甲胺- p处理的甜菜产量低于其他所有处理。1999年,施用1.43 kg - ha -1二甲胺- p的地块比未施用或施用0.72 kg - ha -1二甲胺- p的地块根系和估计可恢复蔗糖产量更高。2000年不同处理的甜菜产量没有差异。在杂草防治试验中,将0.72 kg - ha -1的二甲胺- p施用于二叶至四叶或四叶至六叶甜菜。1998年和1999年,在去甲脒-苯甲脒中添加二甲胺-p,对后期稗草的防治效果分别提高了34%和32%。在去甲脒-苯甲脒+三氟虫隆中添加二甲胺-p, 1998年和1999年的后期稗草防治效果分别提高22%和85%。1998年和1999年,施用POST +二甲胺- p的地块甜菜根产量比不施用二甲胺- p的地块高7.4 ~ 9.6 Mg ha -1。1998年和1999年将二甲胺-P与地米黄-苯米黄配用,1999年将地米黄-苯米黄加氟虫隆配用,甜菜根产量更高(P < 0.1)。1998年,在二叶至四叶甜菜上施用去甲咪啶-苯咪啶+三氟脲+二甲胺-P的根产量显著(P < 0.15)高于不施用二甲胺-P的处理。根产量增加的趋势可能是由于1998年对重根藜、毛龙葵和稗草的防治力度加大,1999年对稗草的防治力度加大。
Efficacy and sugarbeet tolerance with postemergence dimethenamid-P
Field experiments were conducted from 1998 to 2000 to evaluate crop tolerance and weed control from dimethenamid-P alone and in tank-mix combinations applied postemergence (POST) to sugarbeet (Beta vulgaris L.) at Ontario, Oregon. In the tolerance trials dimethenamid-P was applied to four- to six-leaf sugarbeet in 1998 and 1999 and to two- to four-leaf sugarbeet in 2000. Significant (P < 0.05) herbicide injury to sugarbeet was observed in 1998 and 2000 at both 12 and 28 days after treatment (DAT). Sugarbeet injury was not significant for any herbicide treatment in 1999. Dimethenamid-P applied at 2.87 kg ha -1 caused the greatest sugarbeet injury in 1998. Injury in 2000 from tank-mix combinations of dimethenamid-P at 0.72 kg ha -1 plus desmedipham-phenmedipham with and without triflusulfuron was greater than from dimethenamid-P at 2.87 kg ha -1 at 12 DAT and similar at 28 DAT. Sugarbeet yield from plots treated with dimethenamid-P at 2.87 kg ha -1 was less than all other treatments in 1998. In 1999, plots treated with dimethenamid-P at 1.43 kg ha -1 produced greater root and estimated recoverable sucrose yields than untreated plots or those treated with dimethenamid-P at 0.72 kg ha -1 . Sugarbeet yields did not differ among treatments in 2000. In the weed control trials dimethenamid-P at 0.72 kg ha -1 was applied to two- to four- or four- to six-leaf sugarbeet. Dimethenamid-P added to desmedipham-phenmedipham increased late season barnyardgrass control by 34 and 32% in 1998 and 1999, respectively. Late season barnyardgrass control increased 22% in 1998 and 85% in 1999 when dimethenamid-P was added to desmedipham-phenmedipham plus triflusulfuron. Sugarbeet root yields in plots treated with POST combinations plus dimethenamid-P ranged from 7.4 to 9.6 Mg ha -1 higher than those same POST combinations without dimethenamid-P in 1998 and 1999. Sugarbeet root yields were greater (P < 0.1) when dimethenamid-P was applied with desmedipham-phenmedipham in 1998 and 1999 and with desmedipham-phenmedipham plus triflusulfuron in 1999. Desmedipham-phenmedipham plus triflusulfuron plus dimethenamid-P applied to two- to four-leaf sugarbeet provided significantly (P < 0.15) greater root yield than the same treatment without dimethenamid-P in 1998. The trend toward higher root yields was likely due to greater redroot pigweed, hairy nightshade, and barnyardgrass control in 1998 and greater barnyardgrass control in 1999 from dimethenamid-P.