双赢还是输赢?对中国提供大规模监控技术以换取非洲人面部识别的调查

Sumaya Nur Hussein
{"title":"双赢还是输赢?对中国提供大规模监控技术以换取非洲人面部识别的调查","authors":"Sumaya Nur Hussein","doi":"10.29053/pslr.v16i1.4506","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The use of Facial Recognition Technologies (FRT) has becomeincreasingly prevalent. While these technologies have been applaudedfor their many benefits, their use have been criticised for problemsrelating to accuracy. More particularly, FRT technologies havedemonstrated low accuracy when identifying people of colour. This hasled to the call for diversification of data, which has been intensified bymajor corporations and nations competing to lead in ArtificialIntelligence development (the AI race). In an attempt to diversify itsdata sets, China, as a significant player in the AI race, has entered intoan agreement with Zimbabwe. The agreement is meant to benefit bothparties mutually as a ‘win-win’ agreement, which entails the collectionof African facial IDs in exchange for high-end mass surveillancetechnologies. This article questions whether this agreement cangenuinely be a win-win. To demonstrate this, the article will discuss andanalyse China’s viewpoint on this ‘win-win’ in light of the AI race andtake a closer look at how this agreement places China one step ahead ofothers in the race to lead facial recognition technologies. As such, thearticle examines that which is hidden in China’s win-win perspective bydelving deeper into the biometric data and the underlying principles ofits Regulation to determine whether the collection of Facial IDs is inline with these principles. Finally, I attempt to redefine the meaning ofwhat is truly a ‘win-win’ in this context.","PeriodicalId":253815,"journal":{"name":"The Pretoria Student Law Review","volume":"152 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"WIN-WIN OR WIN LOSE? AN EXAMINATION OF CHINA’S SUPPLY OF MASS SURVEILLANCE TECHNOLOGIES IN EXCHANGE FOR AFRICAN’S FACIAL IDS\",\"authors\":\"Sumaya Nur Hussein\",\"doi\":\"10.29053/pslr.v16i1.4506\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The use of Facial Recognition Technologies (FRT) has becomeincreasingly prevalent. While these technologies have been applaudedfor their many benefits, their use have been criticised for problemsrelating to accuracy. More particularly, FRT technologies havedemonstrated low accuracy when identifying people of colour. This hasled to the call for diversification of data, which has been intensified bymajor corporations and nations competing to lead in ArtificialIntelligence development (the AI race). In an attempt to diversify itsdata sets, China, as a significant player in the AI race, has entered intoan agreement with Zimbabwe. The agreement is meant to benefit bothparties mutually as a ‘win-win’ agreement, which entails the collectionof African facial IDs in exchange for high-end mass surveillancetechnologies. This article questions whether this agreement cangenuinely be a win-win. To demonstrate this, the article will discuss andanalyse China’s viewpoint on this ‘win-win’ in light of the AI race andtake a closer look at how this agreement places China one step ahead ofothers in the race to lead facial recognition technologies. As such, thearticle examines that which is hidden in China’s win-win perspective bydelving deeper into the biometric data and the underlying principles ofits Regulation to determine whether the collection of Facial IDs is inline with these principles. Finally, I attempt to redefine the meaning ofwhat is truly a ‘win-win’ in this context.\",\"PeriodicalId\":253815,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Pretoria Student Law Review\",\"volume\":\"152 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-03-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Pretoria Student Law Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.29053/pslr.v16i1.4506\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Pretoria Student Law Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.29053/pslr.v16i1.4506","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

面部识别技术(FRT)的使用已经变得越来越普遍。虽然这些技术因其诸多好处而受到称赞,但它们的使用却因准确性问题而受到批评。更具体地说,在识别有色人种时,FRT技术的准确率很低。这引发了对数据多样化的呼吁,而在人工智能发展(AI竞赛)的领先地位上,各大公司和国家的竞争加剧了这一呼吁。为了使其数据集多样化,作为人工智能竞赛中的重要参与者,中国与津巴布韦达成了一项协议。该协议是一个“双赢”协议,旨在让双方都受益,其中包括收集非洲人的面部识别信息,以换取高端的大规模监控技术。这篇文章质疑这一协议是否总是双赢的。为了证明这一点,本文将讨论和分析中国在人工智能竞赛中对这种“双赢”的看法,并仔细研究该协议如何使中国在领先面部识别技术的竞赛中领先他人一步。因此,本文通过深入研究生物识别数据及其监管的基本原则来研究隐藏在中国双赢视角中的内容,以确定面部id的收集是否符合这些原则。最后,我试图在此背景下重新定义什么是真正的“双赢”。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
WIN-WIN OR WIN LOSE? AN EXAMINATION OF CHINA’S SUPPLY OF MASS SURVEILLANCE TECHNOLOGIES IN EXCHANGE FOR AFRICAN’S FACIAL IDS
The use of Facial Recognition Technologies (FRT) has becomeincreasingly prevalent. While these technologies have been applaudedfor their many benefits, their use have been criticised for problemsrelating to accuracy. More particularly, FRT technologies havedemonstrated low accuracy when identifying people of colour. This hasled to the call for diversification of data, which has been intensified bymajor corporations and nations competing to lead in ArtificialIntelligence development (the AI race). In an attempt to diversify itsdata sets, China, as a significant player in the AI race, has entered intoan agreement with Zimbabwe. The agreement is meant to benefit bothparties mutually as a ‘win-win’ agreement, which entails the collectionof African facial IDs in exchange for high-end mass surveillancetechnologies. This article questions whether this agreement cangenuinely be a win-win. To demonstrate this, the article will discuss andanalyse China’s viewpoint on this ‘win-win’ in light of the AI race andtake a closer look at how this agreement places China one step ahead ofothers in the race to lead facial recognition technologies. As such, thearticle examines that which is hidden in China’s win-win perspective bydelving deeper into the biometric data and the underlying principles ofits Regulation to determine whether the collection of Facial IDs is inline with these principles. Finally, I attempt to redefine the meaning ofwhat is truly a ‘win-win’ in this context.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信