评价新闻文章的摘录摘要技术

Sreeya Reddy Kotrakona Harinatha, Beauty Tatenda Tasara, N. N. Qomariyah
{"title":"评价新闻文章的摘录摘要技术","authors":"Sreeya Reddy Kotrakona Harinatha, Beauty Tatenda Tasara, N. N. Qomariyah","doi":"10.1109/ISITIA52817.2021.9502230","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In recent years, due to the rise of deep learning and natural language processing, text summarization has become a huge topic among scholars. Text summarization derives a shorter coherent version of a longer document. There are two methods of summarization namely, abstractive and extractive. This paper focuses on extractive summarization using TextRank and BERT. These algorithms have been tested under various circumstances to determine the best and they all perform better on certain parameters. The goal of this paper is to determine which algorithm performs better as compared to human generated extractive summaries on news dataset. The same dataset was used for both these algorithms and the summaries were evaluated using ROUGE Score. The result showed that TextRank yielded a better ROUGE score as compared to BERT. TextRank showed higher F-measure and recall while BERT had higher precision.","PeriodicalId":161240,"journal":{"name":"2021 International Seminar on Intelligent Technology and Its Applications (ISITIA)","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluating Extractive Summarization Techniques on News Articles\",\"authors\":\"Sreeya Reddy Kotrakona Harinatha, Beauty Tatenda Tasara, N. N. Qomariyah\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ISITIA52817.2021.9502230\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In recent years, due to the rise of deep learning and natural language processing, text summarization has become a huge topic among scholars. Text summarization derives a shorter coherent version of a longer document. There are two methods of summarization namely, abstractive and extractive. This paper focuses on extractive summarization using TextRank and BERT. These algorithms have been tested under various circumstances to determine the best and they all perform better on certain parameters. The goal of this paper is to determine which algorithm performs better as compared to human generated extractive summaries on news dataset. The same dataset was used for both these algorithms and the summaries were evaluated using ROUGE Score. The result showed that TextRank yielded a better ROUGE score as compared to BERT. TextRank showed higher F-measure and recall while BERT had higher precision.\",\"PeriodicalId\":161240,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2021 International Seminar on Intelligent Technology and Its Applications (ISITIA)\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-07-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2021 International Seminar on Intelligent Technology and Its Applications (ISITIA)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/ISITIA52817.2021.9502230\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2021 International Seminar on Intelligent Technology and Its Applications (ISITIA)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ISITIA52817.2021.9502230","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

近年来,由于深度学习和自然语言处理的兴起,文本摘要已经成为学者们关注的一个巨大话题。文本摘要生成较长文档的较短连贯版本。总结有两种方法,即抽象和抽取。本文主要研究了基于TextRank和BERT的抽取摘要。这些算法已经在各种情况下进行了测试,以确定最佳算法,它们在某些参数上都表现得更好。本文的目标是确定与在新闻数据集上人工生成的提取摘要相比,哪种算法表现更好。这两种算法使用相同的数据集,并使用ROUGE评分对摘要进行评估。结果表明,与BERT相比,TextRank产生了更好的ROUGE得分。TextRank具有较高的F-measure和recall, BERT具有较高的准确率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Evaluating Extractive Summarization Techniques on News Articles
In recent years, due to the rise of deep learning and natural language processing, text summarization has become a huge topic among scholars. Text summarization derives a shorter coherent version of a longer document. There are two methods of summarization namely, abstractive and extractive. This paper focuses on extractive summarization using TextRank and BERT. These algorithms have been tested under various circumstances to determine the best and they all perform better on certain parameters. The goal of this paper is to determine which algorithm performs better as compared to human generated extractive summaries on news dataset. The same dataset was used for both these algorithms and the summaries were evaluated using ROUGE Score. The result showed that TextRank yielded a better ROUGE score as compared to BERT. TextRank showed higher F-measure and recall while BERT had higher precision.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信