三种力量训练方法在训练个体中的生理反应

R. Silva, Krom Marsili Guedes, G. P. L. Almeida, Leonardo Emmanuel de Medeiros Lima, Jones Augusto Rosas Villacrez, R. L. Rica, D. Bocalini, A. F. Figueira Júnior, Dilmar Pinto Guedes Júnior
{"title":"三种力量训练方法在训练个体中的生理反应","authors":"R. Silva, Krom Marsili Guedes, G. P. L. Almeida, Leonardo Emmanuel de Medeiros Lima, Jones Augusto Rosas Villacrez, R. L. Rica, D. Bocalini, A. F. Figueira Júnior, Dilmar Pinto Guedes Júnior","doi":"10.1590/1980-0037.2022v24e87735","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Strength training is an integral part of training programs for aesthetics and sports performance. Although experiments compare the responses of some methods, there is a lack of studies that analyze the time of execution, the recovery and perceptions of pain and exertion. The aim of the present study was to evaluate and compare the metabolic and physiological responses of traditional, drop set and blood flow restriction training. The sample consisted of 16 trained men aged 32 ± 10,5 and minimum of 3 years of continuous and regular practice of ST. Data were collected in 4 days, being the first one assigned to maximum load testing and the following 3 days we analyzed randomly the drop set, blood flow restriction and traditional training methods. Blood lactate was analyzed after the training session. Pre and post intervention arm circumference, heart rate and total time, perceived pain and exertion rating scales, repetition and total volumes. Results showed no significant difference on repetitions number between blood flow restriction and drop set methods but total volume and time were significantly higher on drop set. The highest blood lactate value was found on drop set despite the other methods also show high values. Blood flow restriction and drop set showed significant difference regarding to traditional method on post exercise subjective exertion rating scale, a fact that relates with the highest total volume, mostly on drop set.","PeriodicalId":106840,"journal":{"name":"Revista Brasileira de Cineantropometria & Desempenho Humano","volume":"109 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Physiological responses of three strength training methods in trained individuals\",\"authors\":\"R. Silva, Krom Marsili Guedes, G. P. L. Almeida, Leonardo Emmanuel de Medeiros Lima, Jones Augusto Rosas Villacrez, R. L. Rica, D. Bocalini, A. F. Figueira Júnior, Dilmar Pinto Guedes Júnior\",\"doi\":\"10.1590/1980-0037.2022v24e87735\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract Strength training is an integral part of training programs for aesthetics and sports performance. Although experiments compare the responses of some methods, there is a lack of studies that analyze the time of execution, the recovery and perceptions of pain and exertion. The aim of the present study was to evaluate and compare the metabolic and physiological responses of traditional, drop set and blood flow restriction training. The sample consisted of 16 trained men aged 32 ± 10,5 and minimum of 3 years of continuous and regular practice of ST. Data were collected in 4 days, being the first one assigned to maximum load testing and the following 3 days we analyzed randomly the drop set, blood flow restriction and traditional training methods. Blood lactate was analyzed after the training session. Pre and post intervention arm circumference, heart rate and total time, perceived pain and exertion rating scales, repetition and total volumes. Results showed no significant difference on repetitions number between blood flow restriction and drop set methods but total volume and time were significantly higher on drop set. The highest blood lactate value was found on drop set despite the other methods also show high values. Blood flow restriction and drop set showed significant difference regarding to traditional method on post exercise subjective exertion rating scale, a fact that relates with the highest total volume, mostly on drop set.\",\"PeriodicalId\":106840,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Revista Brasileira de Cineantropometria & Desempenho Humano\",\"volume\":\"109 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1900-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Revista Brasileira de Cineantropometria & Desempenho Humano\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1590/1980-0037.2022v24e87735\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista Brasileira de Cineantropometria & Desempenho Humano","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1590/1980-0037.2022v24e87735","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

力量训练是审美和运动表现训练计划的重要组成部分。虽然实验比较了一些方法的反应,但缺乏分析执行时间、恢复和对疼痛和劳累的感知的研究。本研究的目的是评估和比较传统训练、下降训练和血流限制训练的代谢和生理反应。样本由16名受过训练的男性组成,年龄为32±10,5岁,至少有3年连续和常规的st实践经验。数据在4天内收集,第一个被分配到最大负荷测试,接下来的3天我们随机分析跌落集,血流量限制和传统训练方法。训练结束后分析血乳酸。干预前后臂围,心率和总时间,感知疼痛和劳累评定量表,重复和总容积。结果表明,血流限制法和滴注法在重复次数上无显著差异,但滴注法的总容量和时间显著高于滴注法。血乳酸值以滴置法最高,其他方法也有较高的血乳酸值。在运动后主观用力评定量表上,血流量限制和下降组与传统方法有显著性差异,这与最高的总容积有关,主要与下降组有关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Physiological responses of three strength training methods in trained individuals
Abstract Strength training is an integral part of training programs for aesthetics and sports performance. Although experiments compare the responses of some methods, there is a lack of studies that analyze the time of execution, the recovery and perceptions of pain and exertion. The aim of the present study was to evaluate and compare the metabolic and physiological responses of traditional, drop set and blood flow restriction training. The sample consisted of 16 trained men aged 32 ± 10,5 and minimum of 3 years of continuous and regular practice of ST. Data were collected in 4 days, being the first one assigned to maximum load testing and the following 3 days we analyzed randomly the drop set, blood flow restriction and traditional training methods. Blood lactate was analyzed after the training session. Pre and post intervention arm circumference, heart rate and total time, perceived pain and exertion rating scales, repetition and total volumes. Results showed no significant difference on repetitions number between blood flow restriction and drop set methods but total volume and time were significantly higher on drop set. The highest blood lactate value was found on drop set despite the other methods also show high values. Blood flow restriction and drop set showed significant difference regarding to traditional method on post exercise subjective exertion rating scale, a fact that relates with the highest total volume, mostly on drop set.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信