工作流程管理系统的评估

Horst Gruber
{"title":"工作流程管理系统的评估","authors":"Horst Gruber","doi":"10.1109/CEC.2009.33","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Workflow technology promises an increase in efficiency in the execution of business processes. The technology is widely accepted, but often the high costs exceed the promised benefits. Most companies perform an evaluation of workflow management systems (WFMS) tools before selecting their tool of choice. In this paper a method for selecting a WFMS is presented that is used in practice at Raiffeisen Informatik GmbH - an IT service provider of a banking corporation. The WFMS selection is based on a criteria catalogue covering aspects of functionality, architecture, integration, robustness, and secured prospects.","PeriodicalId":384060,"journal":{"name":"2009 IEEE Conference on Commerce and Enterprise Computing","volume":"19 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2009-07-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluation of Workflow Management Systems\",\"authors\":\"Horst Gruber\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/CEC.2009.33\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Workflow technology promises an increase in efficiency in the execution of business processes. The technology is widely accepted, but often the high costs exceed the promised benefits. Most companies perform an evaluation of workflow management systems (WFMS) tools before selecting their tool of choice. In this paper a method for selecting a WFMS is presented that is used in practice at Raiffeisen Informatik GmbH - an IT service provider of a banking corporation. The WFMS selection is based on a criteria catalogue covering aspects of functionality, architecture, integration, robustness, and secured prospects.\",\"PeriodicalId\":384060,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2009 IEEE Conference on Commerce and Enterprise Computing\",\"volume\":\"19 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2009-07-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2009 IEEE Conference on Commerce and Enterprise Computing\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/CEC.2009.33\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2009 IEEE Conference on Commerce and Enterprise Computing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/CEC.2009.33","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

工作流技术有望提高业务流程执行的效率。这项技术被广泛接受,但高昂的成本往往超过了承诺的收益。大多数公司在选择工具之前都会对工作流管理系统(WFMS)工具进行评估。本文介绍了一种选择WFMS的方法,并在一家银行公司的IT服务提供商Raiffeisen Informatik GmbH的实践中得到了应用。WFMS的选择基于涵盖功能、架构、集成、健壮性和安全前景等方面的标准目录。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Evaluation of Workflow Management Systems
Workflow technology promises an increase in efficiency in the execution of business processes. The technology is widely accepted, but often the high costs exceed the promised benefits. Most companies perform an evaluation of workflow management systems (WFMS) tools before selecting their tool of choice. In this paper a method for selecting a WFMS is presented that is used in practice at Raiffeisen Informatik GmbH - an IT service provider of a banking corporation. The WFMS selection is based on a criteria catalogue covering aspects of functionality, architecture, integration, robustness, and secured prospects.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信