理智的乐观主义……

Eugene W. Holland
{"title":"理智的乐观主义……","authors":"Eugene W. Holland","doi":"10.1080/1040213032000151557","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"One of the difficulties of understanding Empire is that it represents the culmination of work that Hardt and Negri have been pursuing, separately and together, over the last few decades: for better and for worse—for greater economy of expression yet greater difficulty of reading—much of what is said in Empire depends on positions taken and concepts explained in earlier works. My aim here is to reread the later work in relation to some of the earlier work, particularly as it bears on the unusually optimistic tone characteristic of Empire. As unusual as it is, I think that tone can be satisfactorily explained in light of the authors' earlier work; indeed, explanations for it abound there, and I will review several of them. And yet I will suggest that they are not all consistent with one another. I want, in fact, to distinguish within Empire between a methodological optimism (with which I largely agree) and a substantive optimism (about which I have some qualms). It would be wrongheaded and unfair to attribu...","PeriodicalId":177086,"journal":{"name":"Strategies: Journal of Theory, Culture & Politics","volume":"317 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2003-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Optimism of the Intellect...\",\"authors\":\"Eugene W. Holland\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/1040213032000151557\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"One of the difficulties of understanding Empire is that it represents the culmination of work that Hardt and Negri have been pursuing, separately and together, over the last few decades: for better and for worse—for greater economy of expression yet greater difficulty of reading—much of what is said in Empire depends on positions taken and concepts explained in earlier works. My aim here is to reread the later work in relation to some of the earlier work, particularly as it bears on the unusually optimistic tone characteristic of Empire. As unusual as it is, I think that tone can be satisfactorily explained in light of the authors' earlier work; indeed, explanations for it abound there, and I will review several of them. And yet I will suggest that they are not all consistent with one another. I want, in fact, to distinguish within Empire between a methodological optimism (with which I largely agree) and a substantive optimism (about which I have some qualms). It would be wrongheaded and unfair to attribu...\",\"PeriodicalId\":177086,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Strategies: Journal of Theory, Culture & Politics\",\"volume\":\"317 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2003-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Strategies: Journal of Theory, Culture & Politics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/1040213032000151557\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Strategies: Journal of Theory, Culture & Politics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/1040213032000151557","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

理解《帝国》的困难之一是,它代表了哈特和奈格里在过去几十年里分别或共同追求的工作的高潮:无论是好是坏——无论是更经济的表达,还是更大的阅读难度——《帝国》中所说的大部分内容都依赖于早期作品中所采取的立场和解释的概念。我在这里的目的是重读后来的作品,将其与早期的一些作品联系起来,特别是因为它与《帝国》不同寻常的乐观基调有关。尽管这是不寻常的,但我认为,根据作者早期的工作,这种语气可以得到令人满意的解释;事实上,对它的解释有很多,我将回顾其中的几个。然而,我想说的是,它们并不都是相互一致的。事实上,我想在《帝国》一书中区分方法论乐观主义(我基本上同意这一点)和实质性乐观主义(我对此有些疑虑)。这将是错误的和不公平的归因于……
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Optimism of the Intellect...
One of the difficulties of understanding Empire is that it represents the culmination of work that Hardt and Negri have been pursuing, separately and together, over the last few decades: for better and for worse—for greater economy of expression yet greater difficulty of reading—much of what is said in Empire depends on positions taken and concepts explained in earlier works. My aim here is to reread the later work in relation to some of the earlier work, particularly as it bears on the unusually optimistic tone characteristic of Empire. As unusual as it is, I think that tone can be satisfactorily explained in light of the authors' earlier work; indeed, explanations for it abound there, and I will review several of them. And yet I will suggest that they are not all consistent with one another. I want, in fact, to distinguish within Empire between a methodological optimism (with which I largely agree) and a substantive optimism (about which I have some qualms). It would be wrongheaded and unfair to attribu...
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信