面向服务的计算与面向代理的编程在集成方面的比较

Giacomo Cabri, L. Leonardi, Mariachiara Puviani, R. Quitadamo
{"title":"面向服务的计算与面向代理的编程在集成方面的比较","authors":"Giacomo Cabri, L. Leonardi, Mariachiara Puviani, R. Quitadamo","doi":"10.3233/WIA-2011-0211","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Service Oriented Computing (SOC) and Agent Oriented Programming (AOP) are two promising paradigms exploited in the development of distributed systems. In fact, even if starting from different conceptual abstractions, both paradigms try to face unpredictability and complexity in wide and open distributed scenarios. In this context, they exhibit both strengths and weaknesses. The aim of this paper is to propose a comparison between these two paradigms, performed with regard to some issues peculiar of the development of distributed systems that developers must face: space decomposition, interactions among distributed components, reusability/customization, interoperability and security. Of course the purpose of this paper is not to define the “best paradigm”, rather the paper aims at providing developers with critical knowledge about advantages and limitations of the two paradigms. Finally, the need for a smart integration of the two paradigms is pointed out, which will lead to exploit the advantages of both in a joint way. Therefore, we briefly survey some proposals in this direction and report some considerations about them.","PeriodicalId":263450,"journal":{"name":"Web Intell. Agent Syst.","volume":"65 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparing Service-Oriented Computing and Agent-Oriented Programming towards integration\",\"authors\":\"Giacomo Cabri, L. Leonardi, Mariachiara Puviani, R. Quitadamo\",\"doi\":\"10.3233/WIA-2011-0211\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Service Oriented Computing (SOC) and Agent Oriented Programming (AOP) are two promising paradigms exploited in the development of distributed systems. In fact, even if starting from different conceptual abstractions, both paradigms try to face unpredictability and complexity in wide and open distributed scenarios. In this context, they exhibit both strengths and weaknesses. The aim of this paper is to propose a comparison between these two paradigms, performed with regard to some issues peculiar of the development of distributed systems that developers must face: space decomposition, interactions among distributed components, reusability/customization, interoperability and security. Of course the purpose of this paper is not to define the “best paradigm”, rather the paper aims at providing developers with critical knowledge about advantages and limitations of the two paradigms. Finally, the need for a smart integration of the two paradigms is pointed out, which will lead to exploit the advantages of both in a joint way. Therefore, we briefly survey some proposals in this direction and report some considerations about them.\",\"PeriodicalId\":263450,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Web Intell. Agent Syst.\",\"volume\":\"65 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2011-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Web Intell. Agent Syst.\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3233/WIA-2011-0211\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Web Intell. Agent Syst.","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3233/WIA-2011-0211","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

面向服务的计算(SOC)和面向代理的编程(AOP)是分布式系统开发中两个很有前途的范例。事实上,即使从不同的概念抽象开始,这两种范式都试图在广泛和开放的分布式场景中面对不可预测性和复杂性。在这种情况下,它们同时表现出优点和缺点。本文的目的是对这两种范式进行比较,并针对开发人员在分布式系统开发中必须面对的一些特殊问题进行比较:空间分解、分布式组件之间的交互、可重用性/自定义、互操作性和安全性。当然,本文的目的不是定义“最佳范例”,而是旨在为开发人员提供关于这两种范例的优点和局限性的关键知识。最后,指出了对两种模式进行智能整合的必要性,这将导致以联合的方式发挥两者的优势。因此,我们对这方面的一些建议进行了简要的综述,并报告了一些考虑。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparing Service-Oriented Computing and Agent-Oriented Programming towards integration
Service Oriented Computing (SOC) and Agent Oriented Programming (AOP) are two promising paradigms exploited in the development of distributed systems. In fact, even if starting from different conceptual abstractions, both paradigms try to face unpredictability and complexity in wide and open distributed scenarios. In this context, they exhibit both strengths and weaknesses. The aim of this paper is to propose a comparison between these two paradigms, performed with regard to some issues peculiar of the development of distributed systems that developers must face: space decomposition, interactions among distributed components, reusability/customization, interoperability and security. Of course the purpose of this paper is not to define the “best paradigm”, rather the paper aims at providing developers with critical knowledge about advantages and limitations of the two paradigms. Finally, the need for a smart integration of the two paradigms is pointed out, which will lead to exploit the advantages of both in a joint way. Therefore, we briefly survey some proposals in this direction and report some considerations about them.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信