{"title":"正确的因果关系","authors":"Bradford Skow","doi":"10.1093/oso/9780198826965.003.0005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This chapter defends the claim that the most metaphysically basic causal locutions are of the form “X caused Y to Z by Ving,” where terms for things (not events) go in for “X” and “Y.” Claims of this form are called agent-causal claims, since if X caused Y to Z by Ving, then in Ving X did something, so X was an agent. Agent-causal claims are more basic than event-causal claims, claims of the form “C caused E” where terms for events go in for “C” and “E.” Among the arguments given that agent-causal claims are more basic is the argument that if agent-causal claims are more basic then there is an explanation of why events but not states can be causes.","PeriodicalId":298568,"journal":{"name":"Causation, Explanation, and the Metaphysics of Aspect","volume":"62 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-12-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Agent Causation Done Right\",\"authors\":\"Bradford Skow\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/oso/9780198826965.003.0005\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This chapter defends the claim that the most metaphysically basic causal locutions are of the form “X caused Y to Z by Ving,” where terms for things (not events) go in for “X” and “Y.” Claims of this form are called agent-causal claims, since if X caused Y to Z by Ving, then in Ving X did something, so X was an agent. Agent-causal claims are more basic than event-causal claims, claims of the form “C caused E” where terms for events go in for “C” and “E.” Among the arguments given that agent-causal claims are more basic is the argument that if agent-causal claims are more basic then there is an explanation of why events but not states can be causes.\",\"PeriodicalId\":298568,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Causation, Explanation, and the Metaphysics of Aspect\",\"volume\":\"62 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-12-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Causation, Explanation, and the Metaphysics of Aspect\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198826965.003.0005\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Causation, Explanation, and the Metaphysics of Aspect","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198826965.003.0005","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
本章为以下观点辩护,即形而上学上最基本的因果语是" X因ing导致Y到Z "的形式,其中事物(而非事件)的术语用" X "和" Y "表示。这种形式的主张被称为agent-因果主张,因为如果X通过ing导致Y到Z,那么在ing中X做了某件事,所以X是一个行为人。主体因果断言比事件因果断言更基本,事件因果断言的形式是" C导致E "事件的术语是" C "和" E "在认为行为者-因果主张更基本的论证中有一种论证是,如果行为者-因果主张更基本,那么就可以解释为什么事件而不是状态可以成为原因。
This chapter defends the claim that the most metaphysically basic causal locutions are of the form “X caused Y to Z by Ving,” where terms for things (not events) go in for “X” and “Y.” Claims of this form are called agent-causal claims, since if X caused Y to Z by Ving, then in Ving X did something, so X was an agent. Agent-causal claims are more basic than event-causal claims, claims of the form “C caused E” where terms for events go in for “C” and “E.” Among the arguments given that agent-causal claims are more basic is the argument that if agent-causal claims are more basic then there is an explanation of why events but not states can be causes.