减少集群间隔:从概念到实现-一个历史案例

Michael Deasy, K. Brown, Jonathan He, Wade Lipscomb, Matthew Ockree, K. Voller, Joseph H. Frantz
{"title":"减少集群间隔:从概念到实现-一个历史案例","authors":"Michael Deasy, K. Brown, Jonathan He, Wade Lipscomb, Matthew Ockree, K. Voller, Joseph H. Frantz","doi":"10.2118/191801-18ERM-MS","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n This paper presents a case history and lookback on the Reduced Cluster Spacing (RCS) completion design that was initiated in 2012. We review results of the initial analyses used to demonstrate proof of concept, summarize key aspects of the completion design, and discuss execution and results of the initial pilot tests and subsequent field-wide implementation. We propose a method to incorporate results of RCS models into production forecasts, and quantify the impact of RCS designs on volumes and economics over time.\n We begin by presenting proof of concept analyses used to justify the initial field pilot. We then discuss RCS field trials, commenting on key aspects of project design and operational execution. We compare RCS well performance to control wells using normalized production plots, discuss type curve (TC) forecasting for RCS wells, and touch briefly on more rigorous modeling of RCS completions. We present a methodology to incorporate results from rigorous models into simpler type curves suitable for quick economic analyses and volumetric comparisons. We conclude by reviewing the economic and production impact of RCS on production at the well level and field development level.\n Case histories are presented demonstrating the use of a production normalization process to assess the value of different completion designs. We demonstrate that RCS completion designs have been successful in terms of both volumes uplift and economic performance. We describe positive and negative aspects of the route taken to implement this strategy in the field. We conclude that the use of \"uplift factors\" derived from modeling can be used to efficiently incorporate detailed model findings into typical engineering workflows for volumes and economics forecasting. As a result of the work presented in this paper, RCS completions have become the standard in our Marcellus wells.\n This lookback will present a method to effectively demonstrate proof of concept for new completion designs and assess the field implementation of novel completion strategies. This method is demonstrated by quantifying the value of reduced cluster spacing achieved in the Marcellus. We also provide a simple way to incorporate complex model results into every day engineering and economic forecasts.","PeriodicalId":298489,"journal":{"name":"Day 4 Wed, October 10, 2018","volume":"20 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-10-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Reduced Cluster Spacing: From Concept to Implementation – A Case History\",\"authors\":\"Michael Deasy, K. Brown, Jonathan He, Wade Lipscomb, Matthew Ockree, K. Voller, Joseph H. Frantz\",\"doi\":\"10.2118/191801-18ERM-MS\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n This paper presents a case history and lookback on the Reduced Cluster Spacing (RCS) completion design that was initiated in 2012. We review results of the initial analyses used to demonstrate proof of concept, summarize key aspects of the completion design, and discuss execution and results of the initial pilot tests and subsequent field-wide implementation. We propose a method to incorporate results of RCS models into production forecasts, and quantify the impact of RCS designs on volumes and economics over time.\\n We begin by presenting proof of concept analyses used to justify the initial field pilot. We then discuss RCS field trials, commenting on key aspects of project design and operational execution. We compare RCS well performance to control wells using normalized production plots, discuss type curve (TC) forecasting for RCS wells, and touch briefly on more rigorous modeling of RCS completions. We present a methodology to incorporate results from rigorous models into simpler type curves suitable for quick economic analyses and volumetric comparisons. We conclude by reviewing the economic and production impact of RCS on production at the well level and field development level.\\n Case histories are presented demonstrating the use of a production normalization process to assess the value of different completion designs. We demonstrate that RCS completion designs have been successful in terms of both volumes uplift and economic performance. We describe positive and negative aspects of the route taken to implement this strategy in the field. We conclude that the use of \\\"uplift factors\\\" derived from modeling can be used to efficiently incorporate detailed model findings into typical engineering workflows for volumes and economics forecasting. As a result of the work presented in this paper, RCS completions have become the standard in our Marcellus wells.\\n This lookback will present a method to effectively demonstrate proof of concept for new completion designs and assess the field implementation of novel completion strategies. This method is demonstrated by quantifying the value of reduced cluster spacing achieved in the Marcellus. We also provide a simple way to incorporate complex model results into every day engineering and economic forecasts.\",\"PeriodicalId\":298489,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Day 4 Wed, October 10, 2018\",\"volume\":\"20 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-10-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Day 4 Wed, October 10, 2018\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2118/191801-18ERM-MS\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Day 4 Wed, October 10, 2018","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2118/191801-18ERM-MS","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

本文介绍了2012年开始实施的RCS完井设计的历史和回顾。我们回顾了用于证明概念验证的初步分析结果,总结了完井设计的关键方面,并讨论了最初的试点测试和随后的全油田实施的执行和结果。我们提出了一种方法,将RCS模型的结果纳入生产预测,并量化RCS设计对产量和经济的影响。我们首先提出用于证明初始现场试验的概念分析的证明。然后讨论RCS现场试验,对项目设计和操作执行的关键方面进行评论。我们使用归一化生产图将RCS井的性能与控制井进行了比较,讨论了RCS井的类型曲线(TC)预测,并简要介绍了RCS完井的更严格建模。我们提出了一种方法,将严格模型的结果纳入适合快速经济分析和体积比较的简单型曲线。最后,我们回顾了RCS在井一级和油田开发一级对生产的经济和生产影响。案例历史展示了使用生产标准化过程来评估不同完井设计的价值。我们证明,RCS完井设计在增产和经济效益方面都是成功的。我们描述了在实地实施这一战略所采取的路线的积极和消极方面。我们的结论是,使用从建模中得到的“提升因子”可以有效地将详细的模型发现纳入典型的工程工作流程中,以进行产量和经济预测。由于本文所介绍的工作,RCS完井已经成为我们Marcellus井的标准。本次回顾将提供一种方法来有效地证明新完井设计的概念,并评估新完井策略的现场实施情况。该方法通过量化Marcellus实现的簇间距减小值来证明。我们还提供了一种简单的方法,将复杂的模型结果整合到日常的工程和经济预测中。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Reduced Cluster Spacing: From Concept to Implementation – A Case History
This paper presents a case history and lookback on the Reduced Cluster Spacing (RCS) completion design that was initiated in 2012. We review results of the initial analyses used to demonstrate proof of concept, summarize key aspects of the completion design, and discuss execution and results of the initial pilot tests and subsequent field-wide implementation. We propose a method to incorporate results of RCS models into production forecasts, and quantify the impact of RCS designs on volumes and economics over time. We begin by presenting proof of concept analyses used to justify the initial field pilot. We then discuss RCS field trials, commenting on key aspects of project design and operational execution. We compare RCS well performance to control wells using normalized production plots, discuss type curve (TC) forecasting for RCS wells, and touch briefly on more rigorous modeling of RCS completions. We present a methodology to incorporate results from rigorous models into simpler type curves suitable for quick economic analyses and volumetric comparisons. We conclude by reviewing the economic and production impact of RCS on production at the well level and field development level. Case histories are presented demonstrating the use of a production normalization process to assess the value of different completion designs. We demonstrate that RCS completion designs have been successful in terms of both volumes uplift and economic performance. We describe positive and negative aspects of the route taken to implement this strategy in the field. We conclude that the use of "uplift factors" derived from modeling can be used to efficiently incorporate detailed model findings into typical engineering workflows for volumes and economics forecasting. As a result of the work presented in this paper, RCS completions have become the standard in our Marcellus wells. This lookback will present a method to effectively demonstrate proof of concept for new completion designs and assess the field implementation of novel completion strategies. This method is demonstrated by quantifying the value of reduced cluster spacing achieved in the Marcellus. We also provide a simple way to incorporate complex model results into every day engineering and economic forecasts.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信