Huck Bennett, Alexander Golovnev, Noah Stephens-Davidowitz
{"title":"CVP定量硬度的研究","authors":"Huck Bennett, Alexander Golovnev, Noah Stephens-Davidowitz","doi":"10.1109/FOCS.2017.11","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"For odd integers p ≥ 1 (and p = ∞), we show that the Closest Vector Problem in the ℓp norm (CVP_p) over rank n lattices cannot be solved in 2^(1-≥) n time for any constant ≥ 0 unless the Strong Exponential Time Hypothesis (SETH) fails. We then extend this result to almost all values of p ≥ 1, not including the even integers. This comes tantalizingly close to settling the quantitative time complexity of the important special case of CVP_2 (i.e., CVP in the Euclidean norm), for which a 2^{n +o(n)}-time algorithm is known. In particular, our result applies for any p = p(n) ≠ 2 that approaches 2 as n ↦ ∞.We also show a similar SETH-hardness result for SVP_∞; hardness of approximating CVP_p to within some constant factor under the so-called Gap-ETH assumption; and other hardness results for CVP_p and CVPP_p for any 1 ≤ p","PeriodicalId":311592,"journal":{"name":"2017 IEEE 58th Annual Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science (FOCS)","volume":"34 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-04-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"35","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"On the Quantitative Hardness of CVP\",\"authors\":\"Huck Bennett, Alexander Golovnev, Noah Stephens-Davidowitz\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/FOCS.2017.11\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"For odd integers p ≥ 1 (and p = ∞), we show that the Closest Vector Problem in the ℓp norm (CVP_p) over rank n lattices cannot be solved in 2^(1-≥) n time for any constant ≥ 0 unless the Strong Exponential Time Hypothesis (SETH) fails. We then extend this result to almost all values of p ≥ 1, not including the even integers. This comes tantalizingly close to settling the quantitative time complexity of the important special case of CVP_2 (i.e., CVP in the Euclidean norm), for which a 2^{n +o(n)}-time algorithm is known. In particular, our result applies for any p = p(n) ≠ 2 that approaches 2 as n ↦ ∞.We also show a similar SETH-hardness result for SVP_∞; hardness of approximating CVP_p to within some constant factor under the so-called Gap-ETH assumption; and other hardness results for CVP_p and CVPP_p for any 1 ≤ p\",\"PeriodicalId\":311592,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2017 IEEE 58th Annual Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science (FOCS)\",\"volume\":\"34 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-04-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"35\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2017 IEEE 58th Annual Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science (FOCS)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/FOCS.2017.11\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2017 IEEE 58th Annual Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science (FOCS)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/FOCS.2017.11","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
For odd integers p ≥ 1 (and p = ∞), we show that the Closest Vector Problem in the ℓp norm (CVP_p) over rank n lattices cannot be solved in 2^(1-≥) n time for any constant ≥ 0 unless the Strong Exponential Time Hypothesis (SETH) fails. We then extend this result to almost all values of p ≥ 1, not including the even integers. This comes tantalizingly close to settling the quantitative time complexity of the important special case of CVP_2 (i.e., CVP in the Euclidean norm), for which a 2^{n +o(n)}-time algorithm is known. In particular, our result applies for any p = p(n) ≠ 2 that approaches 2 as n ↦ ∞.We also show a similar SETH-hardness result for SVP_∞; hardness of approximating CVP_p to within some constant factor under the so-called Gap-ETH assumption; and other hardness results for CVP_p and CVPP_p for any 1 ≤ p