内存受限的可伸缩性度量

M. Fienup, S. Kothari
{"title":"内存受限的可伸缩性度量","authors":"M. Fienup, S. Kothari","doi":"10.1109/ICPP.1994.34","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A performance evaluation metric called CMP scalability is introduced This metric is useful in analyzing performance of a parallel algorithm as the number of processors grows but the memory size per processor is fixed. The CMP scalability metric is derived for the parallel Matrix Multiplication (MM). Gauss Jordan Elimination (GJE), and Fast Fourier Transform (FFT). These examples show that the CMP scalability metric and the isoefficiency metric really address different aspects of scalability and could lead to very different conclusions. According to the CMP scalability analysis FFT is more scalable than GJE. Interestingly, conclusions drawn from the isoefficiency analysis are quite the opposite. The CMP scalability metric, and so also the isoefficiency metric, is a function indicating the asymptotic behavior as the number of processors becomes large. However, the CMP analysis can also help to analyze the performance of an algorithm on a given architecture with a limited number of processors. We present such an analysis of the three algorithms on a 16K processor MasPar MP-1 machine.","PeriodicalId":162043,"journal":{"name":"1994 International Conference on Parallel Processing Vol. 3","volume":"177 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1994-08-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Memory-Constrained Scalability Metric\",\"authors\":\"M. Fienup, S. Kothari\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ICPP.1994.34\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"A performance evaluation metric called CMP scalability is introduced This metric is useful in analyzing performance of a parallel algorithm as the number of processors grows but the memory size per processor is fixed. The CMP scalability metric is derived for the parallel Matrix Multiplication (MM). Gauss Jordan Elimination (GJE), and Fast Fourier Transform (FFT). These examples show that the CMP scalability metric and the isoefficiency metric really address different aspects of scalability and could lead to very different conclusions. According to the CMP scalability analysis FFT is more scalable than GJE. Interestingly, conclusions drawn from the isoefficiency analysis are quite the opposite. The CMP scalability metric, and so also the isoefficiency metric, is a function indicating the asymptotic behavior as the number of processors becomes large. However, the CMP analysis can also help to analyze the performance of an algorithm on a given architecture with a limited number of processors. We present such an analysis of the three algorithms on a 16K processor MasPar MP-1 machine.\",\"PeriodicalId\":162043,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"1994 International Conference on Parallel Processing Vol. 3\",\"volume\":\"177 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1994-08-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"1994 International Conference on Parallel Processing Vol. 3\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICPP.1994.34\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"1994 International Conference on Parallel Processing Vol. 3","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICPP.1994.34","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

引入了一种称为CMP可伸缩性的性能评估指标。当处理器数量增加但每个处理器的内存大小固定时,该指标可用于分析并行算法的性能。针对并行矩阵乘法(MM)导出了CMP可伸缩性度量。高斯约当消去(GJE)和快速傅立叶变换(FFT)。这些例子表明,CMP可伸缩性度量和等效率度量确实解决了可伸缩性的不同方面,并可能得出非常不同的结论。根据CMP可扩展性分析,FFT比GJE更具可扩展性。有趣的是,从等效率分析中得出的结论恰恰相反。CMP可伸缩性度量,以及等效率度量,是一个指示随着处理器数量变大而渐近行为的函数。但是,CMP分析还可以帮助分析给定架构上具有有限处理器数量的算法的性能。我们在一台16K处理器的MasPar MP-1机器上对这三种算法进行了分析。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A Memory-Constrained Scalability Metric
A performance evaluation metric called CMP scalability is introduced This metric is useful in analyzing performance of a parallel algorithm as the number of processors grows but the memory size per processor is fixed. The CMP scalability metric is derived for the parallel Matrix Multiplication (MM). Gauss Jordan Elimination (GJE), and Fast Fourier Transform (FFT). These examples show that the CMP scalability metric and the isoefficiency metric really address different aspects of scalability and could lead to very different conclusions. According to the CMP scalability analysis FFT is more scalable than GJE. Interestingly, conclusions drawn from the isoefficiency analysis are quite the opposite. The CMP scalability metric, and so also the isoefficiency metric, is a function indicating the asymptotic behavior as the number of processors becomes large. However, the CMP analysis can also help to analyze the performance of an algorithm on a given architecture with a limited number of processors. We present such an analysis of the three algorithms on a 16K processor MasPar MP-1 machine.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信