意大利围绕欧洲一体化的党派冲突:政党竞争的新维度?

N. Conti
{"title":"意大利围绕欧洲一体化的党派冲突:政党竞争的新维度?","authors":"N. Conti","doi":"10.1080/14613190600787435","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The problem of party attitudes towards the process of European integration is one of growing interest in the literature on European studies, as well as that on party politics. Until recently, the two literatures developed without intersecting, until a number of contributions started to focus on the relevance of party orientations towards the EU for the development of European integration as well as for developments in party politics. In this context, Italy has long been associated with a tendency of diffuse party-based Europhilia following a process of slow re-alignment on the issue of European integration lasting more than 30 years. If at the beginning of the 1950s, on the question of the integration of West European democracies there was a deep polarisation—one that reflected the broader polarisation of the party system—at the end of the first republic in the early 1990s, the situation was one of convergence. All parties, excluding the extreme ones, shared not only a broad support for the integration process, but also a specific support for its trajectory as represented by the EC/EU. A widespread expectation at that time was that since the Italian party system had been penetrated by Europhilia, this sentiment would persist even after an important systemic change. This enthusiastic party attitude towards European integration developed alongside a traditional loyal attitude of domestic elites towards the EC. Indeed, it has been argued that among the various attitudes Italian negotiators adopted within the European arena, theirs was always one of loyalty. The instability of domestic governments, characterised by frequent change and ministerial turnover, alongside the frequent change in the government representatives acting in the European arena, might explain the flawed and rather submissive presence of Italy in EC/EU negotiations. The principle-based support for the process of European integration of the leading party of every government coalition, the Christian Democrats (Democrazia Cristiana, DC), and its ability to keep government foreign policy as its privileged domain for almost 50 years contributed to this loyalty on the part of Italian governments. Overall, ideological commitment, a lack of sophisticated tools of foreign policy and a deep embedding of the DC in domestic problems, contributed to the rather submissive attitude of the Italian government in the European arena.","PeriodicalId":313717,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Southern Europe and the Balkans","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2006-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"19","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Party conflict over European integration in Italy: a new dimension of party competition?\",\"authors\":\"N. Conti\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/14613190600787435\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The problem of party attitudes towards the process of European integration is one of growing interest in the literature on European studies, as well as that on party politics. Until recently, the two literatures developed without intersecting, until a number of contributions started to focus on the relevance of party orientations towards the EU for the development of European integration as well as for developments in party politics. In this context, Italy has long been associated with a tendency of diffuse party-based Europhilia following a process of slow re-alignment on the issue of European integration lasting more than 30 years. If at the beginning of the 1950s, on the question of the integration of West European democracies there was a deep polarisation—one that reflected the broader polarisation of the party system—at the end of the first republic in the early 1990s, the situation was one of convergence. All parties, excluding the extreme ones, shared not only a broad support for the integration process, but also a specific support for its trajectory as represented by the EC/EU. A widespread expectation at that time was that since the Italian party system had been penetrated by Europhilia, this sentiment would persist even after an important systemic change. This enthusiastic party attitude towards European integration developed alongside a traditional loyal attitude of domestic elites towards the EC. Indeed, it has been argued that among the various attitudes Italian negotiators adopted within the European arena, theirs was always one of loyalty. The instability of domestic governments, characterised by frequent change and ministerial turnover, alongside the frequent change in the government representatives acting in the European arena, might explain the flawed and rather submissive presence of Italy in EC/EU negotiations. The principle-based support for the process of European integration of the leading party of every government coalition, the Christian Democrats (Democrazia Cristiana, DC), and its ability to keep government foreign policy as its privileged domain for almost 50 years contributed to this loyalty on the part of Italian governments. Overall, ideological commitment, a lack of sophisticated tools of foreign policy and a deep embedding of the DC in domestic problems, contributed to the rather submissive attitude of the Italian government in the European arena.\",\"PeriodicalId\":313717,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Southern Europe and the Balkans\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2006-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"19\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Southern Europe and the Balkans\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/14613190600787435\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Southern Europe and the Balkans","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14613190600787435","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 19

摘要

政党对欧洲一体化进程的态度问题是欧洲研究文献以及政党政治文献中日益增长的兴趣之一。直到最近,这两种文献的发展没有交集,直到一些贡献开始关注政党取向对欧盟的相关性,以促进欧洲一体化的发展,以及政党政治的发展。在这种背景下,意大利长期以来一直与一种分散的、以政党为基础的亲欧倾向联系在一起,此前在欧洲一体化问题上,意大利经历了30多年的缓慢调整过程。如果说在20世纪50年代初,在西欧民主国家的一体化问题上存在着深刻的两极分化——这反映了政党制度更广泛的两极分化——那么在20世纪90年代初的第一共和国末期,情况是趋同的。除极端政党外,所有各方不仅广泛支持一体化进程,而且具体支持以欧共体/欧盟为代表的一体化发展轨迹。当时普遍的预期是,由于意大利的政党体系已经被亲欧派渗透,即使在重大的制度变革之后,这种情绪也会持续下去。这种政党对欧洲一体化的热情态度,与国内精英对欧共体的传统忠诚态度同时发展起来。事实上,有人认为,在意大利谈判代表在欧洲舞台上采取的各种态度中,他们的态度始终是忠诚的。国内政府的不稳定,其特点是频繁的变化和部长更替,以及在欧洲舞台上的政府代表的频繁变化,可能解释了意大利在欧共体/欧盟谈判中的缺陷和相当顺从的存在。每一个联合政府的领导政党基督教民主党对欧洲一体化进程的原则性支持,以及它在近50年的时间里将政府外交政策作为其特权领域的能力,促成了意大利政府的这种忠诚。总的来说,意识形态上的承诺、缺乏成熟的外交政策工具,以及民主党对国内问题的深深纠缠,导致了意大利政府在欧洲舞台上相当顺从的态度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Party conflict over European integration in Italy: a new dimension of party competition?
The problem of party attitudes towards the process of European integration is one of growing interest in the literature on European studies, as well as that on party politics. Until recently, the two literatures developed without intersecting, until a number of contributions started to focus on the relevance of party orientations towards the EU for the development of European integration as well as for developments in party politics. In this context, Italy has long been associated with a tendency of diffuse party-based Europhilia following a process of slow re-alignment on the issue of European integration lasting more than 30 years. If at the beginning of the 1950s, on the question of the integration of West European democracies there was a deep polarisation—one that reflected the broader polarisation of the party system—at the end of the first republic in the early 1990s, the situation was one of convergence. All parties, excluding the extreme ones, shared not only a broad support for the integration process, but also a specific support for its trajectory as represented by the EC/EU. A widespread expectation at that time was that since the Italian party system had been penetrated by Europhilia, this sentiment would persist even after an important systemic change. This enthusiastic party attitude towards European integration developed alongside a traditional loyal attitude of domestic elites towards the EC. Indeed, it has been argued that among the various attitudes Italian negotiators adopted within the European arena, theirs was always one of loyalty. The instability of domestic governments, characterised by frequent change and ministerial turnover, alongside the frequent change in the government representatives acting in the European arena, might explain the flawed and rather submissive presence of Italy in EC/EU negotiations. The principle-based support for the process of European integration of the leading party of every government coalition, the Christian Democrats (Democrazia Cristiana, DC), and its ability to keep government foreign policy as its privileged domain for almost 50 years contributed to this loyalty on the part of Italian governments. Overall, ideological commitment, a lack of sophisticated tools of foreign policy and a deep embedding of the DC in domestic problems, contributed to the rather submissive attitude of the Italian government in the European arena.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信