使用20个场景、ITU-T Rec. P.913兼容主观方法、VQM和PSNR表征HEVC编码效率进步

Andrew Catellier, M. Pinson
{"title":"使用20个场景、ITU-T Rec. P.913兼容主观方法、VQM和PSNR表征HEVC编码效率进步","authors":"Andrew Catellier, M. Pinson","doi":"10.1109/ISM.2015.38","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The new video coding standard, MPEG-H Part 2 High Efficiency Video Coding (HEVC) or H.265, was developed to be roughly twice as efficient as H.264/AVC -- meaning H.265/HEVC could deliver the same quality as H.264/AVC using roughly half the bitrate. In this paper we describe a subjective experiment designed to test this claim. We present an experiment using 20 different 1080p 29.97 fps scenes and 12 impairment levels spanning MPEG-2, H.264/AVC and H.265/HEVC. Additionally we compare the results obtained from the subjective assessment to quality estimates from two objective metrics: VQM and PSNR. Our subjective results show that H.265/HEVC can deliver the same quality at half the bitrate compared to H.264/AVC and can perform better at one quarter the bitrate compared to MPEG-2 in many, but not all, situations. For all 20 scenes coded with H.265/HEVC at 4 Mbps mean opinion scores span 38% of the subjective scale, which indicates the importance of scene selection. Objective quality estimations of HEVC have a low correlation with subjective results (0.60 for VQM, 0.64 for PSNR).","PeriodicalId":250353,"journal":{"name":"2015 IEEE International Symposium on Multimedia (ISM)","volume":"87 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-12-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Characterization of the HEVC Coding Efficiency Advance Using 20 Scenes, ITU-T Rec. P.913 Compliant Subjective Methods, VQM, and PSNR\",\"authors\":\"Andrew Catellier, M. Pinson\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ISM.2015.38\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The new video coding standard, MPEG-H Part 2 High Efficiency Video Coding (HEVC) or H.265, was developed to be roughly twice as efficient as H.264/AVC -- meaning H.265/HEVC could deliver the same quality as H.264/AVC using roughly half the bitrate. In this paper we describe a subjective experiment designed to test this claim. We present an experiment using 20 different 1080p 29.97 fps scenes and 12 impairment levels spanning MPEG-2, H.264/AVC and H.265/HEVC. Additionally we compare the results obtained from the subjective assessment to quality estimates from two objective metrics: VQM and PSNR. Our subjective results show that H.265/HEVC can deliver the same quality at half the bitrate compared to H.264/AVC and can perform better at one quarter the bitrate compared to MPEG-2 in many, but not all, situations. For all 20 scenes coded with H.265/HEVC at 4 Mbps mean opinion scores span 38% of the subjective scale, which indicates the importance of scene selection. Objective quality estimations of HEVC have a low correlation with subjective results (0.60 for VQM, 0.64 for PSNR).\",\"PeriodicalId\":250353,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2015 IEEE International Symposium on Multimedia (ISM)\",\"volume\":\"87 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2015-12-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"6\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2015 IEEE International Symposium on Multimedia (ISM)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/ISM.2015.38\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2015 IEEE International Symposium on Multimedia (ISM)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ISM.2015.38","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

摘要

新的视频编码标准MPEG-H Part 2 High Efficiency video coding (HEVC)或H.265的效率大约是H.264/AVC的两倍,这意味着H.265/HEVC可以以大约一半的比特率提供与H.264/AVC相同的质量。在本文中,我们描述了一个主观实验,旨在验证这一说法。我们提出了一个实验,使用20个不同的1080p 29.97 fps场景和12个MPEG-2, H.264/AVC和H.265/HEVC的损伤级别。此外,我们比较了从主观评估中获得的结果与两个客观指标的质量估计:VQM和PSNR。我们的主观结果表明,H.265/HEVC可以以H.264/AVC一半的比特率提供相同的质量,并且在许多情况下(但不是所有情况)可以以比MPEG-2四分之一的比特率表现得更好。对于所有用H.265/HEVC以4 Mbps编码的20个场景,平均意见得分超过主观尺度的38%,这表明场景选择的重要性。HEVC的客观质量评价与主观结果的相关性较低(VQM为0.60,PSNR为0.64)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Characterization of the HEVC Coding Efficiency Advance Using 20 Scenes, ITU-T Rec. P.913 Compliant Subjective Methods, VQM, and PSNR
The new video coding standard, MPEG-H Part 2 High Efficiency Video Coding (HEVC) or H.265, was developed to be roughly twice as efficient as H.264/AVC -- meaning H.265/HEVC could deliver the same quality as H.264/AVC using roughly half the bitrate. In this paper we describe a subjective experiment designed to test this claim. We present an experiment using 20 different 1080p 29.97 fps scenes and 12 impairment levels spanning MPEG-2, H.264/AVC and H.265/HEVC. Additionally we compare the results obtained from the subjective assessment to quality estimates from two objective metrics: VQM and PSNR. Our subjective results show that H.265/HEVC can deliver the same quality at half the bitrate compared to H.264/AVC and can perform better at one quarter the bitrate compared to MPEG-2 in many, but not all, situations. For all 20 scenes coded with H.265/HEVC at 4 Mbps mean opinion scores span 38% of the subjective scale, which indicates the importance of scene selection. Objective quality estimations of HEVC have a low correlation with subjective results (0.60 for VQM, 0.64 for PSNR).
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信