关于早期分离关注点的调查

Safoora Shakil Khan, M. Rehman
{"title":"关于早期分离关注点的调查","authors":"Safoora Shakil Khan, M. Rehman","doi":"10.1109/APSEC.2005.17","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Aspect oriented software development (AOSD) focuses on the separation of crosscutting concerns. Crosscutting concerns are separable at the requirements phase, design phase, or implementation phase. In this survey, we have classified aspect oriented requirements engineering (AORE) approaches as traditional and non-traditional requirements engineering approaches. The traditional approaches are based on fundamental requirements engineering approaches such as viewpoint oriented, use case/scenario, and goal oriented approaches. Whereas the non-traditional approaches are based on component based engineering, feature driven developments, and domain analysis and engineering. The AORE models have been compared on the basis of systematic activities for separation of concerns: identify, separate, represent, and compose, conflict resolution techniques, and tool support. This survey deals with the open issues put forward by various authors and the observations made by analyses of the AORE models.","PeriodicalId":359862,"journal":{"name":"12th Asia-Pacific Software Engineering Conference (APSEC'05)","volume":"10 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2005-12-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"13","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A survey on early separation of concerns\",\"authors\":\"Safoora Shakil Khan, M. Rehman\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/APSEC.2005.17\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Aspect oriented software development (AOSD) focuses on the separation of crosscutting concerns. Crosscutting concerns are separable at the requirements phase, design phase, or implementation phase. In this survey, we have classified aspect oriented requirements engineering (AORE) approaches as traditional and non-traditional requirements engineering approaches. The traditional approaches are based on fundamental requirements engineering approaches such as viewpoint oriented, use case/scenario, and goal oriented approaches. Whereas the non-traditional approaches are based on component based engineering, feature driven developments, and domain analysis and engineering. The AORE models have been compared on the basis of systematic activities for separation of concerns: identify, separate, represent, and compose, conflict resolution techniques, and tool support. This survey deals with the open issues put forward by various authors and the observations made by analyses of the AORE models.\",\"PeriodicalId\":359862,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"12th Asia-Pacific Software Engineering Conference (APSEC'05)\",\"volume\":\"10 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2005-12-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"13\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"12th Asia-Pacific Software Engineering Conference (APSEC'05)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/APSEC.2005.17\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"12th Asia-Pacific Software Engineering Conference (APSEC'05)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/APSEC.2005.17","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 13

摘要

面向方面的软件开发(AOSD)侧重于横切关注点的分离。横切关注点在需求阶段、设计阶段或实现阶段是可分离的。在这个调查中,我们将面向方面的需求工程(AORE)方法分为传统的和非传统的需求工程方法。传统的方法是基于基本的需求工程方法,如面向视点、用例/场景和面向目标的方法。而非传统的方法则是基于基于组件的工程、特性驱动的开发以及领域分析和工程。AORE模型已经在关注分离的系统活动的基础上进行了比较:识别、分离、表示和组合、冲突解决技术和工具支持。本文讨论了不同作者提出的开放性问题以及通过分析AORE模型得出的结论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A survey on early separation of concerns
Aspect oriented software development (AOSD) focuses on the separation of crosscutting concerns. Crosscutting concerns are separable at the requirements phase, design phase, or implementation phase. In this survey, we have classified aspect oriented requirements engineering (AORE) approaches as traditional and non-traditional requirements engineering approaches. The traditional approaches are based on fundamental requirements engineering approaches such as viewpoint oriented, use case/scenario, and goal oriented approaches. Whereas the non-traditional approaches are based on component based engineering, feature driven developments, and domain analysis and engineering. The AORE models have been compared on the basis of systematic activities for separation of concerns: identify, separate, represent, and compose, conflict resolution techniques, and tool support. This survey deals with the open issues put forward by various authors and the observations made by analyses of the AORE models.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信