通过不同的影响和第十四修正案恢复无证件者的住房权利:联邦住房管理局的问题,§1981,和优先权

Rob Ley
{"title":"通过不同的影响和第十四修正案恢复无证件者的住房权利:联邦住房管理局的问题,§1981,和优先权","authors":"Rob Ley","doi":"10.15779/Z38K086","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Anti-immigrant housing ordinances have become a tool for state authorities in their efforts to curb local effects of a defunct federal immigration scheme. Federal frustration and resentment has culminated in state resistance through ordinances inquiring into citizenship status as a condition for renting or leasing property. The legality of these discriminatory ordinances is disputable and heavily contested. But","PeriodicalId":408518,"journal":{"name":"Berkeley La Raza Law Journal","volume":"108 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Reviving Housing Rights of the Undocumented through Disparate Impact and the Fourteenth Amendment: The Problem with the FHA, § 1981, & Preemption\",\"authors\":\"Rob Ley\",\"doi\":\"10.15779/Z38K086\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Anti-immigrant housing ordinances have become a tool for state authorities in their efforts to curb local effects of a defunct federal immigration scheme. Federal frustration and resentment has culminated in state resistance through ordinances inquiring into citizenship status as a condition for renting or leasing property. The legality of these discriminatory ordinances is disputable and heavily contested. But\",\"PeriodicalId\":408518,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Berkeley La Raza Law Journal\",\"volume\":\"108 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1900-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Berkeley La Raza Law Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.15779/Z38K086\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Berkeley La Raza Law Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15779/Z38K086","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

反移民住房条例已成为各州当局努力遏制联邦移民计划失效对当地影响的工具。联邦政府的失望和怨恨在各州的抵制中达到了顶峰,他们颁布法令,要求将公民身份作为租赁财产的条件。这些歧视性条例的合法性是有争议和激烈争议的。但
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Reviving Housing Rights of the Undocumented through Disparate Impact and the Fourteenth Amendment: The Problem with the FHA, § 1981, & Preemption
Anti-immigrant housing ordinances have become a tool for state authorities in their efforts to curb local effects of a defunct federal immigration scheme. Federal frustration and resentment has culminated in state resistance through ordinances inquiring into citizenship status as a condition for renting or leasing property. The legality of these discriminatory ordinances is disputable and heavily contested. But
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信