补偿平衡:注释

Youngna Choi, Yeomin Yoon
{"title":"补偿平衡:注释","authors":"Youngna Choi, Yeomin Yoon","doi":"10.32890/IJBF2004.2.1.8346","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Compensating balance are deposits the borrowing firm keeps with the lending bank in non-interest bearing accounts on loans.It is well known that, when there is no compensating balance imposed, the effective cost of debt remains the same in the two different payment methods, full amortization method and bullet loan (bond) method.It has been experimentally shown that when a compensating balance is imposed, however, the respective effective costs of debt under the two payment methods become different and that the true cost of a fully-amortized loan is always greater than that of a bullet loan. This paper provides a mathematical proof than this is always true.It concludes that, whenever a bank imposes a compensating balance, the borrowing firm should prefer a bullet loan to a fully-amortized one if it wishes to avoid an ambush posed by such a compensating balance.","PeriodicalId":170943,"journal":{"name":"The International Journal of Banking and Finance","volume":"35 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2004-06-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Compensating balance: A comment\",\"authors\":\"Youngna Choi, Yeomin Yoon\",\"doi\":\"10.32890/IJBF2004.2.1.8346\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Compensating balance are deposits the borrowing firm keeps with the lending bank in non-interest bearing accounts on loans.It is well known that, when there is no compensating balance imposed, the effective cost of debt remains the same in the two different payment methods, full amortization method and bullet loan (bond) method.It has been experimentally shown that when a compensating balance is imposed, however, the respective effective costs of debt under the two payment methods become different and that the true cost of a fully-amortized loan is always greater than that of a bullet loan. This paper provides a mathematical proof than this is always true.It concludes that, whenever a bank imposes a compensating balance, the borrowing firm should prefer a bullet loan to a fully-amortized one if it wishes to avoid an ambush posed by such a compensating balance.\",\"PeriodicalId\":170943,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The International Journal of Banking and Finance\",\"volume\":\"35 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2004-06-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The International Journal of Banking and Finance\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.32890/IJBF2004.2.1.8346\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The International Journal of Banking and Finance","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.32890/IJBF2004.2.1.8346","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

补偿余额是指借款公司在贷款的无息账户中存在贷款银行的存款。众所周知,在不施加补偿性余额的情况下,债务的有效成本在全额摊销法和子弹式贷款(债券)法两种不同的支付方式中是相同的。然而,实验表明,当施加补偿余额时,两种支付方式下的债务各自的有效成本变得不同,并且完全摊销贷款的真实成本总是大于子弹贷款的真实成本。本文提供了一个数学证明,证明这总是正确的。它的结论是,每当银行施加补偿余额时,如果借款公司希望避免这种补偿余额造成的伏击,它就应该选择子弹贷款而不是完全摊销的贷款。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Compensating balance: A comment
Compensating balance are deposits the borrowing firm keeps with the lending bank in non-interest bearing accounts on loans.It is well known that, when there is no compensating balance imposed, the effective cost of debt remains the same in the two different payment methods, full amortization method and bullet loan (bond) method.It has been experimentally shown that when a compensating balance is imposed, however, the respective effective costs of debt under the two payment methods become different and that the true cost of a fully-amortized loan is always greater than that of a bullet loan. This paper provides a mathematical proof than this is always true.It concludes that, whenever a bank imposes a compensating balance, the borrowing firm should prefer a bullet loan to a fully-amortized one if it wishes to avoid an ambush posed by such a compensating balance.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信