在多套接字平台上评估Lustre的元数据服务器

Konstantinos Chasapis, M. F. Dolz, Michael Kuhn, T. Ludwig
{"title":"在多套接字平台上评估Lustre的元数据服务器","authors":"Konstantinos Chasapis, M. F. Dolz, Michael Kuhn, T. Ludwig","doi":"10.1109/PDSW.2014.5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"With the emergence of multi-core and multi-socket non-uniform memory access (NUMA) platforms in recent years, new software challenges have arisen to use them efficiently. In the field of high performance computing (HPC), parallel programming has always been the key factor to improve applications performance. However, the implications of parallel architectures in the system software has been overlooked until recently. In this work, we examine the implications of such platforms in the performance scalability of the Lustre parallel distributed file system's metadata server (MDS). We run our experiments on a four socket NUMA platform that has 48 cores. We leverage the mdtest benchmark to generate appropriate metadata workloads and include configurations with varying numbers of active cores and mount points. Additionally, we compare Lustre's metadata scalability with the local file systems ext4 and XFS. The results demonstrate that Lustre's metadata performance is limited to a single socket and decreases when more sockets are used. We also observe that the MDS's back-end device is not a limiting factor regarding the performance.","PeriodicalId":151633,"journal":{"name":"2014 9th Parallel Data Storage Workshop","volume":"67 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-11-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluating Lustre's Metadata Server on a Multi-Socket Platform\",\"authors\":\"Konstantinos Chasapis, M. F. Dolz, Michael Kuhn, T. Ludwig\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/PDSW.2014.5\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"With the emergence of multi-core and multi-socket non-uniform memory access (NUMA) platforms in recent years, new software challenges have arisen to use them efficiently. In the field of high performance computing (HPC), parallel programming has always been the key factor to improve applications performance. However, the implications of parallel architectures in the system software has been overlooked until recently. In this work, we examine the implications of such platforms in the performance scalability of the Lustre parallel distributed file system's metadata server (MDS). We run our experiments on a four socket NUMA platform that has 48 cores. We leverage the mdtest benchmark to generate appropriate metadata workloads and include configurations with varying numbers of active cores and mount points. Additionally, we compare Lustre's metadata scalability with the local file systems ext4 and XFS. The results demonstrate that Lustre's metadata performance is limited to a single socket and decreases when more sockets are used. We also observe that the MDS's back-end device is not a limiting factor regarding the performance.\",\"PeriodicalId\":151633,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2014 9th Parallel Data Storage Workshop\",\"volume\":\"67 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2014-11-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"5\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2014 9th Parallel Data Storage Workshop\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/PDSW.2014.5\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2014 9th Parallel Data Storage Workshop","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/PDSW.2014.5","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

摘要

近年来,随着多核多套接字非统一内存访问(NUMA)平台的出现,如何有效地利用这些平台,对软件开发提出了新的挑战。在高性能计算领域,并行编程一直是提高应用程序性能的关键因素。然而,并行架构在系统软件中的含义直到最近才被忽视。在这项工作中,我们研究了这些平台对Lustre并行分布式文件系统元数据服务器(MDS)的性能可扩展性的影响。我们在一个有48个内核的四个插槽NUMA平台上运行我们的实验。我们利用mdtest基准来生成适当的元数据工作负载,并包含具有不同数量的活动内核和挂载点的配置。此外,我们将Lustre的元数据可伸缩性与本地文件系统ext4和XFS进行比较。结果表明,Lustre的元数据性能仅限于单个套接字,并且当使用更多套接字时性能会下降。我们还观察到MDS的后端设备不是性能方面的限制因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Evaluating Lustre's Metadata Server on a Multi-Socket Platform
With the emergence of multi-core and multi-socket non-uniform memory access (NUMA) platforms in recent years, new software challenges have arisen to use them efficiently. In the field of high performance computing (HPC), parallel programming has always been the key factor to improve applications performance. However, the implications of parallel architectures in the system software has been overlooked until recently. In this work, we examine the implications of such platforms in the performance scalability of the Lustre parallel distributed file system's metadata server (MDS). We run our experiments on a four socket NUMA platform that has 48 cores. We leverage the mdtest benchmark to generate appropriate metadata workloads and include configurations with varying numbers of active cores and mount points. Additionally, we compare Lustre's metadata scalability with the local file systems ext4 and XFS. The results demonstrate that Lustre's metadata performance is limited to a single socket and decreases when more sockets are used. We also observe that the MDS's back-end device is not a limiting factor regarding the performance.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信