N. Haliza, Nofinawati Nofinawati, Damri Batubara, Nando Fahrizal
{"title":"不良融资(NPF)和盈利资产质量(KAP)对资产回报率(ROA)的影响,印尼人民银行,Tbk 2009-2018","authors":"N. Haliza, Nofinawati Nofinawati, Damri Batubara, Nando Fahrizal","doi":"10.24952/jsb.v2i1.4444","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Return On Assets (ROA) is a ratio used to determine the bank's ability to generate profits. The problem in this research is that there is a phenomenon that is not in accordance with the theory. Where, in 2011 the fourth quarter of Non Performing Financing (NPF) decreased accompanied by a decrease in the value of Return On Assets (ROA), as well as Earning Asset Quality (KAP) increased but was not followed by an increase in Return On Assets (ROA). This research is a quantitative research, with the research location at PT. Bank Rakyat Indonesia Syariah, Tbk using secondary data as many as 40 samples in the form of quarterly consolidated financial statements obtained from the website www.ojk.go.id. Analysis of the data used is multiple linear regression test, classic assumption test, coefficient of determination (R2), as well as t test and F test. The results of the partial study (t test) show that Non Performing Financing (NPF) has a significant effect on return. On Assets (ROA), as evidenced by tcount ttable (2.464 2.026) with a significance level of 0.019 0.05, and Earning Asset Quality (KAP) has a significant effect on Return On Assets (ROA), as evidenced by - tcount -ttable that is (-3.385-2.026) with a significance level of 0.002 0.05. Meanwhile, simultaneously Non-Performing Financing (NPF) and Earning Asset Quality (KAP) have a significant effect on Return On Assets (ROA) as evidenced by Fcount Ftable (8.981 3.25) with a significant level of 0.001 0.05.The Effect of Non Performing Financing (NPF) and Earning Asset Quality (KAP) on Return On Assets (ROA) at PT. Bank Rakyat Indonesia Syariah, Tbk 2009-2018","PeriodicalId":208862,"journal":{"name":"Journal Of Sharia Banking","volume":"49 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Effect of Non Performing Financing (NPF) and Earning Asset Quality (KAP) on Return On Assets (ROA) at PT. Bank Rakyat Indonesia Syariah, Tbk 2009-2018\",\"authors\":\"N. Haliza, Nofinawati Nofinawati, Damri Batubara, Nando Fahrizal\",\"doi\":\"10.24952/jsb.v2i1.4444\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Return On Assets (ROA) is a ratio used to determine the bank's ability to generate profits. The problem in this research is that there is a phenomenon that is not in accordance with the theory. Where, in 2011 the fourth quarter of Non Performing Financing (NPF) decreased accompanied by a decrease in the value of Return On Assets (ROA), as well as Earning Asset Quality (KAP) increased but was not followed by an increase in Return On Assets (ROA). This research is a quantitative research, with the research location at PT. Bank Rakyat Indonesia Syariah, Tbk using secondary data as many as 40 samples in the form of quarterly consolidated financial statements obtained from the website www.ojk.go.id. Analysis of the data used is multiple linear regression test, classic assumption test, coefficient of determination (R2), as well as t test and F test. The results of the partial study (t test) show that Non Performing Financing (NPF) has a significant effect on return. On Assets (ROA), as evidenced by tcount ttable (2.464 2.026) with a significance level of 0.019 0.05, and Earning Asset Quality (KAP) has a significant effect on Return On Assets (ROA), as evidenced by - tcount -ttable that is (-3.385-2.026) with a significance level of 0.002 0.05. Meanwhile, simultaneously Non-Performing Financing (NPF) and Earning Asset Quality (KAP) have a significant effect on Return On Assets (ROA) as evidenced by Fcount Ftable (8.981 3.25) with a significant level of 0.001 0.05.The Effect of Non Performing Financing (NPF) and Earning Asset Quality (KAP) on Return On Assets (ROA) at PT. Bank Rakyat Indonesia Syariah, Tbk 2009-2018\",\"PeriodicalId\":208862,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal Of Sharia Banking\",\"volume\":\"49 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-07-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal Of Sharia Banking\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.24952/jsb.v2i1.4444\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal Of Sharia Banking","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24952/jsb.v2i1.4444","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
资产收益率(ROA)是用来确定银行产生利润能力的比率。本研究的问题在于存在一个与理论不相符的现象。其中,2011年第四季度,不良融资(NPF)下降,资产收益率(ROA)下降,盈利资产质量(KAP)增加,但资产收益率(ROA)没有增加。本研究是一项定量研究,研究地点为PT. Bank Rakyat Indonesia Syariah, Tbk,使用从网站www.ojk.go.id获得的季度合并财务报表形式的多达40个样本的二手数据。数据分析采用多元线性回归检验、经典假设检验、决定系数(R2)以及t检验和F检验。部分研究结果(t检验)表明,不良融资(NPF)对收益有显著影响。资产收益率(ROA),由tcount表(2.464 2.026)证明,其显著性水平为0.019 0.05;盈余资产质量(KAP)对资产收益率(ROA)有显著性影响,由- tcount表(-3.385-2.026)证明,其显著性水平为0.002 0.05。同时,不良融资(NPF)和盈余资产质量(KAP)同时对资产收益率(ROA)有显著影响,Fcount Ftable(8.981 3.25)证明其显著水平为0.001 0.05。不良融资(NPF)和盈利资产质量(KAP)对资产回报率(ROA)的影响,印尼人民银行,Tbk 2009-2018
The Effect of Non Performing Financing (NPF) and Earning Asset Quality (KAP) on Return On Assets (ROA) at PT. Bank Rakyat Indonesia Syariah, Tbk 2009-2018
Return On Assets (ROA) is a ratio used to determine the bank's ability to generate profits. The problem in this research is that there is a phenomenon that is not in accordance with the theory. Where, in 2011 the fourth quarter of Non Performing Financing (NPF) decreased accompanied by a decrease in the value of Return On Assets (ROA), as well as Earning Asset Quality (KAP) increased but was not followed by an increase in Return On Assets (ROA). This research is a quantitative research, with the research location at PT. Bank Rakyat Indonesia Syariah, Tbk using secondary data as many as 40 samples in the form of quarterly consolidated financial statements obtained from the website www.ojk.go.id. Analysis of the data used is multiple linear regression test, classic assumption test, coefficient of determination (R2), as well as t test and F test. The results of the partial study (t test) show that Non Performing Financing (NPF) has a significant effect on return. On Assets (ROA), as evidenced by tcount ttable (2.464 2.026) with a significance level of 0.019 0.05, and Earning Asset Quality (KAP) has a significant effect on Return On Assets (ROA), as evidenced by - tcount -ttable that is (-3.385-2.026) with a significance level of 0.002 0.05. Meanwhile, simultaneously Non-Performing Financing (NPF) and Earning Asset Quality (KAP) have a significant effect on Return On Assets (ROA) as evidenced by Fcount Ftable (8.981 3.25) with a significant level of 0.001 0.05.The Effect of Non Performing Financing (NPF) and Earning Asset Quality (KAP) on Return On Assets (ROA) at PT. Bank Rakyat Indonesia Syariah, Tbk 2009-2018