基于web界面的简化代表性基本体积(SREV)砂石预测与控制监测(SPCM)自动化工作流程,以提高缅甸Zawtika油田的作业效率

Supha-Kitti Dhadachaipathomphong, P. Sooksawat, P. Toprasert, C. Peerakham, Nattapong Lertrojanachusit, F. Nazir, Fengjuan Wang, Melani Pattinama, Jiajun Dai, Mohammad Taufiq Lihawa, C. Chaiyasart
{"title":"基于web界面的简化代表性基本体积(SREV)砂石预测与控制监测(SPCM)自动化工作流程,以提高缅甸Zawtika油田的作业效率","authors":"Supha-Kitti Dhadachaipathomphong, P. Sooksawat, P. Toprasert, C. Peerakham, Nattapong Lertrojanachusit, F. Nazir, Fengjuan Wang, Melani Pattinama, Jiajun Dai, Mohammad Taufiq Lihawa, C. Chaiyasart","doi":"10.2523/iptc-22989-ms","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n The oil and gas industry has been plagued by formation sand production for decades because of negative impacts on wellbore stability and equipment, despite the fact that it has been demonstrated to be a highly effective technique to increase well productivity (Wang, J. et al., 2004). The consequent sanding problem of sand production has been conducted, wearing down production equipment and necessitating environmentally acceptable disposal criteria. The sand production from unconsolidated sand formations in shallow depth have been reported 10% to 40% sand cuts with 5% in heavy oil reservoir (Tremblay, et al., 1999) and averaged 40% in light oil reservoir (Papamichos, et al., 2001). The objective is to increase operation efficiency of sand monitoring and control by using a sand prediction model to estimate sand production per well based on current operating conditions, as well as to calculate sand operating envelope for each well to guide the production planning and management. Vardoulakis I. and et al (1996) were the first proposed the hydro-erosion model based on rigid porous media in 1996. The erosion models were extended to include the effect of the deformation of porous media in a consistent manner (Wan and Wang, 2002) and include a fully coupled reservoir-geomechanics model as representative elementary volume (REV) to account for the effects of multiphase flow and geomechanics in a consistent manner (Wang et al., 2004). Methodology was starting from data collection, conducted Simplified Representative Elementary Volume (SREV), Integrated Asset model of well, model calibration, monitoring, integration of well, facility for prediction of sand accumulation and wall thickness condition. In addition, a data driven was imbedded to integration as well as workflow automation and user surveillance dashboard in web-based interfaces. The calibration process has been proved the models results with greater than 90% accuracy of sand production. It was found that SREV and IAM approach to sand prediction and control monitoring (SPCM) successful gave an improvement in operations efficiency by reducing time spent on manual analysis and decision-making process through dashboards with predictive results.","PeriodicalId":185347,"journal":{"name":"Day 3 Fri, March 03, 2023","volume":"6 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"An Automated Workflow of Simplified Representative Elementary Volume (SREV) Approach to Sand Prediction and Control Monitoring (SPCM) Using Web-Based Interfaces to Reference with Operation Efficiency Improvement in Zawtika Field, Myanmar\",\"authors\":\"Supha-Kitti Dhadachaipathomphong, P. Sooksawat, P. Toprasert, C. Peerakham, Nattapong Lertrojanachusit, F. Nazir, Fengjuan Wang, Melani Pattinama, Jiajun Dai, Mohammad Taufiq Lihawa, C. Chaiyasart\",\"doi\":\"10.2523/iptc-22989-ms\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n The oil and gas industry has been plagued by formation sand production for decades because of negative impacts on wellbore stability and equipment, despite the fact that it has been demonstrated to be a highly effective technique to increase well productivity (Wang, J. et al., 2004). The consequent sanding problem of sand production has been conducted, wearing down production equipment and necessitating environmentally acceptable disposal criteria. The sand production from unconsolidated sand formations in shallow depth have been reported 10% to 40% sand cuts with 5% in heavy oil reservoir (Tremblay, et al., 1999) and averaged 40% in light oil reservoir (Papamichos, et al., 2001). The objective is to increase operation efficiency of sand monitoring and control by using a sand prediction model to estimate sand production per well based on current operating conditions, as well as to calculate sand operating envelope for each well to guide the production planning and management. Vardoulakis I. and et al (1996) were the first proposed the hydro-erosion model based on rigid porous media in 1996. The erosion models were extended to include the effect of the deformation of porous media in a consistent manner (Wan and Wang, 2002) and include a fully coupled reservoir-geomechanics model as representative elementary volume (REV) to account for the effects of multiphase flow and geomechanics in a consistent manner (Wang et al., 2004). Methodology was starting from data collection, conducted Simplified Representative Elementary Volume (SREV), Integrated Asset model of well, model calibration, monitoring, integration of well, facility for prediction of sand accumulation and wall thickness condition. In addition, a data driven was imbedded to integration as well as workflow automation and user surveillance dashboard in web-based interfaces. The calibration process has been proved the models results with greater than 90% accuracy of sand production. It was found that SREV and IAM approach to sand prediction and control monitoring (SPCM) successful gave an improvement in operations efficiency by reducing time spent on manual analysis and decision-making process through dashboards with predictive results.\",\"PeriodicalId\":185347,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Day 3 Fri, March 03, 2023\",\"volume\":\"6 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-02-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Day 3 Fri, March 03, 2023\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2523/iptc-22989-ms\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Day 3 Fri, March 03, 2023","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2523/iptc-22989-ms","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

尽管地层出砂已被证明是提高油井产能的一种非常有效的技术,但由于对井筒稳定性和设备的负面影响,石油和天然气行业几十年来一直受到地层出砂的困扰(Wang, J. et al., 2004)。由此产生的出砂问题,磨损了生产设备,需要环境可接受的处理标准。据报道,浅层未固结砂层的出砂率为10% - 40%,其中稠油油藏的出砂率为5% (Tremblay等,1999),轻油油藏的平均出砂率为40% (Papamichos等,2001)。目的是通过利用出砂预测模型,根据当前作业条件估算每口井的出砂量,并计算出每口井的出砂作业包线,以指导生产计划和管理,从而提高出砂监测和控制的作业效率。Vardoulakis I.等(1996)于1996年首次提出了基于刚性多孔介质的水力侵蚀模型。侵蚀模型被扩展到以一致的方式包括多孔介质变形的影响(Wan和Wang, 2002),并包括一个完全耦合的油藏-地质力学模型作为代表性基本体积(REV),以一致的方式考虑多相流和地质力学的影响(Wang等人,2004)。方法从数据收集开始,进行简化代表性基本体积(SREV)、井综合资产模型、模型标定、监测、井集成、设备积砂及壁厚预测。此外,在基于web的界面中,数据驱动被嵌入到集成以及工作流自动化和用户监视仪表板中。标定过程证明,该模型的出砂精度在90%以上。研究发现,SREV和IAM方法成功地进行了出砂预测和控制监测(SPCM),减少了通过带有预测结果的仪表板进行人工分析和决策过程所花费的时间,提高了作业效率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
An Automated Workflow of Simplified Representative Elementary Volume (SREV) Approach to Sand Prediction and Control Monitoring (SPCM) Using Web-Based Interfaces to Reference with Operation Efficiency Improvement in Zawtika Field, Myanmar
The oil and gas industry has been plagued by formation sand production for decades because of negative impacts on wellbore stability and equipment, despite the fact that it has been demonstrated to be a highly effective technique to increase well productivity (Wang, J. et al., 2004). The consequent sanding problem of sand production has been conducted, wearing down production equipment and necessitating environmentally acceptable disposal criteria. The sand production from unconsolidated sand formations in shallow depth have been reported 10% to 40% sand cuts with 5% in heavy oil reservoir (Tremblay, et al., 1999) and averaged 40% in light oil reservoir (Papamichos, et al., 2001). The objective is to increase operation efficiency of sand monitoring and control by using a sand prediction model to estimate sand production per well based on current operating conditions, as well as to calculate sand operating envelope for each well to guide the production planning and management. Vardoulakis I. and et al (1996) were the first proposed the hydro-erosion model based on rigid porous media in 1996. The erosion models were extended to include the effect of the deformation of porous media in a consistent manner (Wan and Wang, 2002) and include a fully coupled reservoir-geomechanics model as representative elementary volume (REV) to account for the effects of multiphase flow and geomechanics in a consistent manner (Wang et al., 2004). Methodology was starting from data collection, conducted Simplified Representative Elementary Volume (SREV), Integrated Asset model of well, model calibration, monitoring, integration of well, facility for prediction of sand accumulation and wall thickness condition. In addition, a data driven was imbedded to integration as well as workflow automation and user surveillance dashboard in web-based interfaces. The calibration process has been proved the models results with greater than 90% accuracy of sand production. It was found that SREV and IAM approach to sand prediction and control monitoring (SPCM) successful gave an improvement in operations efficiency by reducing time spent on manual analysis and decision-making process through dashboards with predictive results.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信