通过标准化改善投资者沟通和分析

Mike K Willis
{"title":"通过标准化改善投资者沟通和分析","authors":"Mike K Willis","doi":"10.4192/1577-8517-V7_6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Over time, a market dialog of taxonomy extension best practices will improve\nconstituent communication and investor analysis and comparability assessments. A stated\ngoal/objective typically associated with the adoption of the Extensible Business Reporting\nLanguage (XBRL1 ) is the enhancement of information quality, specifically comparability.\nTerms often cited include 'Standard', 'Standardization' and 'Comparability'. This paper discusses\nthese three separate but related topics by clarifying common definitions, relationships, uses, and\nlimitations. The paper recognizes various comparability perceptions, and it demonstrates how\nXBRL enhances comparability and perhaps it takes it to a new level. Finally, the paper suggests\ncontinue dialog with market participants on best practices for further development of concepts\nrelevant to enhancing comparability.","PeriodicalId":404481,"journal":{"name":"The International Journal of Digital Accounting Research","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Improving investor communications and analysis via standardization\",\"authors\":\"Mike K Willis\",\"doi\":\"10.4192/1577-8517-V7_6\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Over time, a market dialog of taxonomy extension best practices will improve\\nconstituent communication and investor analysis and comparability assessments. A stated\\ngoal/objective typically associated with the adoption of the Extensible Business Reporting\\nLanguage (XBRL1 ) is the enhancement of information quality, specifically comparability.\\nTerms often cited include 'Standard', 'Standardization' and 'Comparability'. This paper discusses\\nthese three separate but related topics by clarifying common definitions, relationships, uses, and\\nlimitations. The paper recognizes various comparability perceptions, and it demonstrates how\\nXBRL enhances comparability and perhaps it takes it to a new level. Finally, the paper suggests\\ncontinue dialog with market participants on best practices for further development of concepts\\nrelevant to enhancing comparability.\",\"PeriodicalId\":404481,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The International Journal of Digital Accounting Research\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1900-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"5\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The International Journal of Digital Accounting Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4192/1577-8517-V7_6\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The International Journal of Digital Accounting Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4192/1577-8517-V7_6","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

摘要

随着时间的推移,分类法扩展最佳实践的市场对话将改善成分沟通、投资者分析和可比性评估。通常与采用可扩展业务报告语言(XBRL1)相关的一个既定目标是增强信息质量,特别是可比性。经常被引用的术语包括“标准”、“标准化”和“可比性”。本文通过澄清常见的定义、关系、用途和限制来讨论这三个独立但相关的主题。本文认识到各种可比性概念,并演示了xbrl如何增强可比性,也许还将其提升到一个新的水平。最后,本文建议继续与市场参与者就最佳实践进行对话,以进一步发展与增强可比性相关的概念。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Improving investor communications and analysis via standardization
Over time, a market dialog of taxonomy extension best practices will improve constituent communication and investor analysis and comparability assessments. A stated goal/objective typically associated with the adoption of the Extensible Business Reporting Language (XBRL1 ) is the enhancement of information quality, specifically comparability. Terms often cited include 'Standard', 'Standardization' and 'Comparability'. This paper discusses these three separate but related topics by clarifying common definitions, relationships, uses, and limitations. The paper recognizes various comparability perceptions, and it demonstrates how XBRL enhances comparability and perhaps it takes it to a new level. Finally, the paper suggests continue dialog with market participants on best practices for further development of concepts relevant to enhancing comparability.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信