命名数据网络中缓存替换策略的仿真研究

H. Situmorang, N. Syambas, T. Juhana, Ian Yosef Matheus Edward
{"title":"命名数据网络中缓存替换策略的仿真研究","authors":"H. Situmorang, N. Syambas, T. Juhana, Ian Yosef Matheus Edward","doi":"10.1109/TSSA.2018.8708796","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"NDN (Named Data Networking) as one approach of the Content-Centric Networking (CCN) architecture, proposed by Jacobson, 2006, conceptually, has some advantages compares to the current Internet technology which build based on host-to-host TCP/IP protocol stack. However, technically, we have to examine the NDN approach, beside to prove the concept, also to get as much as able the opportunities of improvement the concept before implementation stage. In this work, it has been compared two kinds of cache replacement policy. The policies that compared are the Least Recency Used (LRU) and Least Recency/Frequency Used (LRFU). In the first stage both of these policies implemented and then the performance comparison has been investigated. Based on the experiment, the LRFU policy outperform LRU policy with a limited cache size. As a consequence the LRFU has a time complexity higher than LRU. Finally, based on the simulation can be concluded that LRFU should be considered as cache replacement strategy on NDN instead of basic NDN cache policy, named as caching everything everywhere (CEE)","PeriodicalId":159795,"journal":{"name":"2018 12th International Conference on Telecommunication Systems, Services, and Applications (TSSA)","volume":"04 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Simulation of Cache Replacement Strategy on Named Data Network\",\"authors\":\"H. Situmorang, N. Syambas, T. Juhana, Ian Yosef Matheus Edward\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/TSSA.2018.8708796\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"NDN (Named Data Networking) as one approach of the Content-Centric Networking (CCN) architecture, proposed by Jacobson, 2006, conceptually, has some advantages compares to the current Internet technology which build based on host-to-host TCP/IP protocol stack. However, technically, we have to examine the NDN approach, beside to prove the concept, also to get as much as able the opportunities of improvement the concept before implementation stage. In this work, it has been compared two kinds of cache replacement policy. The policies that compared are the Least Recency Used (LRU) and Least Recency/Frequency Used (LRFU). In the first stage both of these policies implemented and then the performance comparison has been investigated. Based on the experiment, the LRFU policy outperform LRU policy with a limited cache size. As a consequence the LRFU has a time complexity higher than LRU. Finally, based on the simulation can be concluded that LRFU should be considered as cache replacement strategy on NDN instead of basic NDN cache policy, named as caching everything everywhere (CEE)\",\"PeriodicalId\":159795,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2018 12th International Conference on Telecommunication Systems, Services, and Applications (TSSA)\",\"volume\":\"04 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2018 12th International Conference on Telecommunication Systems, Services, and Applications (TSSA)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/TSSA.2018.8708796\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2018 12th International Conference on Telecommunication Systems, Services, and Applications (TSSA)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/TSSA.2018.8708796","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

NDN(命名数据网络)作为内容中心网络(CCN)体系结构的一种方法,由Jacobson于2006年提出,从概念上讲,与当前基于主机对主机TCP/IP协议栈构建的互联网技术相比,具有一些优势。然而,从技术上讲,我们必须检查NDN方法,除了证明概念之外,还要在实施阶段之前尽可能多地获得改进概念的机会。本文对两种缓存替换策略进行了比较。比较的策略是LRU (Least recently Used)和LRFU (Least recently /Frequency Used)。在第一阶段,对这两种策略进行了实施,然后对性能进行了比较。实验结果表明,在有限缓存大小的情况下,LRFU策略优于LRU策略。因此,LRFU具有比LRU更高的时间复杂度。最后,通过仿真可以得出LRFU应该作为NDN上的缓存替换策略,而不是基本的NDN缓存策略,命名为cache everything everywhere (CEE)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A Simulation of Cache Replacement Strategy on Named Data Network
NDN (Named Data Networking) as one approach of the Content-Centric Networking (CCN) architecture, proposed by Jacobson, 2006, conceptually, has some advantages compares to the current Internet technology which build based on host-to-host TCP/IP protocol stack. However, technically, we have to examine the NDN approach, beside to prove the concept, also to get as much as able the opportunities of improvement the concept before implementation stage. In this work, it has been compared two kinds of cache replacement policy. The policies that compared are the Least Recency Used (LRU) and Least Recency/Frequency Used (LRFU). In the first stage both of these policies implemented and then the performance comparison has been investigated. Based on the experiment, the LRFU policy outperform LRU policy with a limited cache size. As a consequence the LRFU has a time complexity higher than LRU. Finally, based on the simulation can be concluded that LRFU should be considered as cache replacement strategy on NDN instead of basic NDN cache policy, named as caching everything everywhere (CEE)
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信