残疾或没有经查证的人之间的区别——这是理论要求和实践经验的反映

Maike Rudolph
{"title":"残疾或没有经查证的人之间的区别——这是理论要求和实践经验的反映","authors":"Maike Rudolph","doi":"10.14361/aua-2023-020112","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This text draws on her theoretical knowledge as a student of sociology and education, and her practi - cal experience as a teacher in a special school for mental development, to argue that the classification of special needs education and the standards for measuring students’ abilities—such as intelligence tests— primarily serve to justify and legitimise the separation of people with attributed disabilities from society. The author argues that this both reinforces a capitalist logic and contradicts a humanistic worldview in which every person is treated equally and should therefore be reflected upon critically and fought against in practice","PeriodicalId":349086,"journal":{"name":"Außeruniversitäre Aktion. Wissenschaft und Gesellschaft im Gespräch","volume":"102 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Grenzen zwischen Menschen mit und ohne zugeschriebener Behinderung – eine Reflexion zwischen theoretischem Anspruch und praktischen Erfahrungen\",\"authors\":\"Maike Rudolph\",\"doi\":\"10.14361/aua-2023-020112\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This text draws on her theoretical knowledge as a student of sociology and education, and her practi - cal experience as a teacher in a special school for mental development, to argue that the classification of special needs education and the standards for measuring students’ abilities—such as intelligence tests— primarily serve to justify and legitimise the separation of people with attributed disabilities from society. The author argues that this both reinforces a capitalist logic and contradicts a humanistic worldview in which every person is treated equally and should therefore be reflected upon critically and fought against in practice\",\"PeriodicalId\":349086,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Außeruniversitäre Aktion. Wissenschaft und Gesellschaft im Gespräch\",\"volume\":\"102 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Außeruniversitäre Aktion. Wissenschaft und Gesellschaft im Gespräch\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.14361/aua-2023-020112\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Außeruniversitäre Aktion. Wissenschaft und Gesellschaft im Gespräch","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14361/aua-2023-020112","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文利用她作为一名社会学和教育专业学生的理论知识,以及她在一所精神发展特殊学校担任教师的实际经验,认为特殊需要教育的分类和衡量学生能力的标准——如智力测试——主要是为了证明和合法化将残疾人士与社会隔离开来。作者认为,这既强化了资本主义逻辑,又与人人平等的人文主义世界观相矛盾,因此应该在实践中进行批判性反思和反对
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Grenzen zwischen Menschen mit und ohne zugeschriebener Behinderung – eine Reflexion zwischen theoretischem Anspruch und praktischen Erfahrungen
This text draws on her theoretical knowledge as a student of sociology and education, and her practi - cal experience as a teacher in a special school for mental development, to argue that the classification of special needs education and the standards for measuring students’ abilities—such as intelligence tests— primarily serve to justify and legitimise the separation of people with attributed disabilities from society. The author argues that this both reinforces a capitalist logic and contradicts a humanistic worldview in which every person is treated equally and should therefore be reflected upon critically and fought against in practice
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信