一个角色扮演模拟,以支持可持续社会技术系统的评估为公民和由公民

Chloé Le Bail, F. Détienne, M. Baker
{"title":"一个角色扮演模拟,以支持可持续社会技术系统的评估为公民和由公民","authors":"Chloé Le Bail, F. Détienne, M. Baker","doi":"10.1145/3232078.3232091","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We propose and analyse the use of a Role-Playing Simulation (RPS) for supporting assessment of a sustainable sociotechnical system, a neighbourhood that encourages collaborative consumption practices; and for creating new solutions about this system. We analyse the processes by which solutions are collaboratively designed by citizens who are playing the roles of potential inhabitants, focussing on the analysis of argumentative interactions. Results show that the RPS stimulates debate about sociotechnical solutions, rules and rational criteria, in addition to sustainability values and ideological criteria. The RPS is thus a means for making sociotechnical solutions evolve and for identifying what is \"technically\", \"socially\" and \"ideologically\" necessary for acceptance and success of the future system.","PeriodicalId":263115,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 36th European Conference on Cognitive Ergonomics","volume":"15 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-09-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Role-Playing Simulation to support assessment of sustainable sociotechnical systems for and by citizens\",\"authors\":\"Chloé Le Bail, F. Détienne, M. Baker\",\"doi\":\"10.1145/3232078.3232091\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"We propose and analyse the use of a Role-Playing Simulation (RPS) for supporting assessment of a sustainable sociotechnical system, a neighbourhood that encourages collaborative consumption practices; and for creating new solutions about this system. We analyse the processes by which solutions are collaboratively designed by citizens who are playing the roles of potential inhabitants, focussing on the analysis of argumentative interactions. Results show that the RPS stimulates debate about sociotechnical solutions, rules and rational criteria, in addition to sustainability values and ideological criteria. The RPS is thus a means for making sociotechnical solutions evolve and for identifying what is \\\"technically\\\", \\\"socially\\\" and \\\"ideologically\\\" necessary for acceptance and success of the future system.\",\"PeriodicalId\":263115,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings of the 36th European Conference on Cognitive Ergonomics\",\"volume\":\"15 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-09-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings of the 36th European Conference on Cognitive Ergonomics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1145/3232078.3232091\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 36th European Conference on Cognitive Ergonomics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3232078.3232091","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

我们提出并分析了角色扮演模拟(RPS)的使用,以支持可持续社会技术系统的评估,这是一个鼓励协作消费实践的社区;为这个系统创造新的解决方案。我们分析了由扮演潜在居民角色的公民共同设计解决方案的过程,重点分析了争论性互动。结果表明,除了可持续性价值观和意识形态标准外,RPS还激发了关于社会技术解决方案、规则和理性标准的辩论。因此,RPS是一种使社会技术解决方案不断发展的手段,也是一种识别未来系统接受和成功所必需的“技术”、“社会”和“意识形态”的手段。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A Role-Playing Simulation to support assessment of sustainable sociotechnical systems for and by citizens
We propose and analyse the use of a Role-Playing Simulation (RPS) for supporting assessment of a sustainable sociotechnical system, a neighbourhood that encourages collaborative consumption practices; and for creating new solutions about this system. We analyse the processes by which solutions are collaboratively designed by citizens who are playing the roles of potential inhabitants, focussing on the analysis of argumentative interactions. Results show that the RPS stimulates debate about sociotechnical solutions, rules and rational criteria, in addition to sustainability values and ideological criteria. The RPS is thus a means for making sociotechnical solutions evolve and for identifying what is "technically", "socially" and "ideologically" necessary for acceptance and success of the future system.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信