简短公告:排队还是优先排队?分布式事务存储器的缓存一致性协议设计

Bo Zhang, B. Ravindran
{"title":"简短公告:排队还是优先排队?分布式事务存储器的缓存一致性协议设计","authors":"Bo Zhang, B. Ravindran","doi":"10.1145/1835698.1835716","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In distributed transactional memory (TM) systems, both the management and consistency of a distributed transactional object are ensured by a cache-coherence protocol. We formalize two classes of cache-coherence protocols: distributed queuing cache-coherence (DQC) protocols and distributed priority queuing cache-coherence (DPQC) protocols, both of which can be implemented based on a given distributed queuing protocol. We analyze the two classes of protocols for a set of dynamically generated transactions and compare their time complexities against that of an optimal offline clairvoyant algorithm. We show that a DQC protocol is O(Nlog Dδ)-competitive and a DPQC protocol is O(log Dδ)-competitive for a set of N transactions, where Dδ is the normalized maximum communication latency provided by the underlying distributed queuing protocol.","PeriodicalId":447863,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 29th ACM SIGACT-SIGOPS symposium on Principles of distributed computing","volume":"30 10 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2010-07-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Brief announcement: queuing or priority queuing? on the design of cache-coherence protocols for distributed transactional memory\",\"authors\":\"Bo Zhang, B. Ravindran\",\"doi\":\"10.1145/1835698.1835716\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In distributed transactional memory (TM) systems, both the management and consistency of a distributed transactional object are ensured by a cache-coherence protocol. We formalize two classes of cache-coherence protocols: distributed queuing cache-coherence (DQC) protocols and distributed priority queuing cache-coherence (DPQC) protocols, both of which can be implemented based on a given distributed queuing protocol. We analyze the two classes of protocols for a set of dynamically generated transactions and compare their time complexities against that of an optimal offline clairvoyant algorithm. We show that a DQC protocol is O(Nlog Dδ)-competitive and a DPQC protocol is O(log Dδ)-competitive for a set of N transactions, where Dδ is the normalized maximum communication latency provided by the underlying distributed queuing protocol.\",\"PeriodicalId\":447863,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings of the 29th ACM SIGACT-SIGOPS symposium on Principles of distributed computing\",\"volume\":\"30 10 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2010-07-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings of the 29th ACM SIGACT-SIGOPS symposium on Principles of distributed computing\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1145/1835698.1835716\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 29th ACM SIGACT-SIGOPS symposium on Principles of distributed computing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/1835698.1835716","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

在分布式事务内存(TM)系统中,分布式事务对象的管理和一致性由缓存一致性协议保证。我们形式化了两类缓存一致性协议:分布式队列缓存一致性(DQC)协议和分布式优先级队列缓存一致性(DPQC)协议,这两种协议都可以基于给定的分布式队列协议来实现。我们分析了一组动态生成事务的两类协议,并将它们的时间复杂性与最优离线透视算法的时间复杂性进行了比较。我们证明,对于一组N个事务,DQC协议是O(Nlog Dδ)竞争的,DPQC协议是O(log Dδ)竞争的,其中Dδ是底层分布式队列协议提供的标准化最大通信延迟。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Brief announcement: queuing or priority queuing? on the design of cache-coherence protocols for distributed transactional memory
In distributed transactional memory (TM) systems, both the management and consistency of a distributed transactional object are ensured by a cache-coherence protocol. We formalize two classes of cache-coherence protocols: distributed queuing cache-coherence (DQC) protocols and distributed priority queuing cache-coherence (DPQC) protocols, both of which can be implemented based on a given distributed queuing protocol. We analyze the two classes of protocols for a set of dynamically generated transactions and compare their time complexities against that of an optimal offline clairvoyant algorithm. We show that a DQC protocol is O(Nlog Dδ)-competitive and a DPQC protocol is O(log Dδ)-competitive for a set of N transactions, where Dδ is the normalized maximum communication latency provided by the underlying distributed queuing protocol.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信