{"title":"可靠的比较和交换容错同步","authors":"Philippe Raipin Parvédy, M. Raynal","doi":"10.1109/WORDS.2003.1218065","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper presents two Compare&Swap protocols that, with respect to omission failures, are (1) fault-tolerant and (2) gracefully degrading, respectively. It shows that fault-tolerance and graceful degradation are close but distinct concepts, and that graceful degradation is inherently more costly than fault-tolerance. These Compare&Swap protocols are derived from consensus protocols proposed by Jayanti et al. (1999).","PeriodicalId":225796,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the Eighth International Workshop on Object-Oriented Real-Time Dependable Systems, 2003. (WORDS 2003).","volume":"53 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2003-08-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Reliable Compare&Swap for fault-tolerant synchronization\",\"authors\":\"Philippe Raipin Parvédy, M. Raynal\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/WORDS.2003.1218065\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper presents two Compare&Swap protocols that, with respect to omission failures, are (1) fault-tolerant and (2) gracefully degrading, respectively. It shows that fault-tolerance and graceful degradation are close but distinct concepts, and that graceful degradation is inherently more costly than fault-tolerance. These Compare&Swap protocols are derived from consensus protocols proposed by Jayanti et al. (1999).\",\"PeriodicalId\":225796,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings of the Eighth International Workshop on Object-Oriented Real-Time Dependable Systems, 2003. (WORDS 2003).\",\"volume\":\"53 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2003-08-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings of the Eighth International Workshop on Object-Oriented Real-Time Dependable Systems, 2003. (WORDS 2003).\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/WORDS.2003.1218065\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the Eighth International Workshop on Object-Oriented Real-Time Dependable Systems, 2003. (WORDS 2003).","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/WORDS.2003.1218065","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Reliable Compare&Swap for fault-tolerant synchronization
This paper presents two Compare&Swap protocols that, with respect to omission failures, are (1) fault-tolerant and (2) gracefully degrading, respectively. It shows that fault-tolerance and graceful degradation are close but distinct concepts, and that graceful degradation is inherently more costly than fault-tolerance. These Compare&Swap protocols are derived from consensus protocols proposed by Jayanti et al. (1999).