收入不平等、意识形态与僵局:日益加剧的不平等如何加剧政治两极分化

J. Voorheis, N. McCarty, Boris Shor
{"title":"收入不平等、意识形态与僵局:日益加剧的不平等如何加剧政治两极分化","authors":"J. Voorheis, N. McCarty, Boris Shor","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2649215","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Income inequality and political polarization have both increased dramatically in the United States over the last several decades. A small but growing literature has suggested that these two phenomena may be related and mutually reinforcing: income inequality leads to political polarization, and the gridlock induced by polarization reduces the ability of politicians to alleviate rising inequality. Scholars, however, have not credibly identied the causal relationships. Using newly available data on polarization in state legislatures and state-level income inequality, we extend previous analyses to the US state level. Employing a relatively underutilized instrumental variables identication strategy allows us to obtain the rst credible causal estimates of the eect of inequality on polarization within states. We nd that income inequality has a large, positive and statistically signicant","PeriodicalId":346888,"journal":{"name":"PSN: Income Inequality (Topic)","volume":"16 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-08-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"74","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Unequal Incomes, Ideology and Gridlock: How Rising Inequality Increases Political Polarization\",\"authors\":\"J. Voorheis, N. McCarty, Boris Shor\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.2649215\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Income inequality and political polarization have both increased dramatically in the United States over the last several decades. A small but growing literature has suggested that these two phenomena may be related and mutually reinforcing: income inequality leads to political polarization, and the gridlock induced by polarization reduces the ability of politicians to alleviate rising inequality. Scholars, however, have not credibly identied the causal relationships. Using newly available data on polarization in state legislatures and state-level income inequality, we extend previous analyses to the US state level. Employing a relatively underutilized instrumental variables identication strategy allows us to obtain the rst credible causal estimates of the eect of inequality on polarization within states. We nd that income inequality has a large, positive and statistically signicant\",\"PeriodicalId\":346888,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"PSN: Income Inequality (Topic)\",\"volume\":\"16 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2015-08-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"74\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"PSN: Income Inequality (Topic)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2649215\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PSN: Income Inequality (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2649215","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 74

摘要

在过去几十年里,美国的收入不平等和政治两极分化都急剧加剧。越来越多的文献表明,这两种现象可能是相互关联且相互加强的:收入不平等导致政治两极分化,两极分化引发的僵局降低了政治家缓解日益加剧的不平等的能力。然而,学者们并没有可靠地确定其中的因果关系。利用最新的关于州立法机构两极分化和州一级收入不平等的数据,我们将之前的分析扩展到美国州一级。采用一种相对未充分利用的工具变量识别策略,使我们能够获得不平等对国家内部两极分化影响的第一个可信的因果估计。我们发现收入不平等具有较大的、正的且统计显著性
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Unequal Incomes, Ideology and Gridlock: How Rising Inequality Increases Political Polarization
Income inequality and political polarization have both increased dramatically in the United States over the last several decades. A small but growing literature has suggested that these two phenomena may be related and mutually reinforcing: income inequality leads to political polarization, and the gridlock induced by polarization reduces the ability of politicians to alleviate rising inequality. Scholars, however, have not credibly identied the causal relationships. Using newly available data on polarization in state legislatures and state-level income inequality, we extend previous analyses to the US state level. Employing a relatively underutilized instrumental variables identication strategy allows us to obtain the rst credible causal estimates of the eect of inequality on polarization within states. We nd that income inequality has a large, positive and statistically signicant
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信