交叉上市与公司治理:结合还是回避?

A. Licht
{"title":"交叉上市与公司治理:结合还是回避?","authors":"A. Licht","doi":"10.2139/SSRN.382660","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper questions the bonding hypothesis on cross-listing - namely, the idea that firms may want to list on a foreign stock market with a view to renting that market's superior corporate governance system. All too often, cross-listing studies are oblivious to the special structure of the U.S. regulatory regime, which governs foreign issuers. This paper highlights these features and provides a comprehensive survey of the extant empirical evidence. A critical review of this evidence reveals that an opposite, \"avoiding hypothesis\" more aptly describes firms' cross-listing behavior with regard to corporate governance issues. If anything, more stringent regimes deter issuers, and there is evidence that insiders behave opportunistically with regard to the cross-listing decision.","PeriodicalId":423843,"journal":{"name":"Corporate Law: Corporate Governance Law","volume":"10 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2003-04-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"246","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Cross-Listing and Corporate Governance: Bonding or Avoiding?\",\"authors\":\"A. Licht\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/SSRN.382660\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper questions the bonding hypothesis on cross-listing - namely, the idea that firms may want to list on a foreign stock market with a view to renting that market's superior corporate governance system. All too often, cross-listing studies are oblivious to the special structure of the U.S. regulatory regime, which governs foreign issuers. This paper highlights these features and provides a comprehensive survey of the extant empirical evidence. A critical review of this evidence reveals that an opposite, \\\"avoiding hypothesis\\\" more aptly describes firms' cross-listing behavior with regard to corporate governance issues. If anything, more stringent regimes deter issuers, and there is evidence that insiders behave opportunistically with regard to the cross-listing decision.\",\"PeriodicalId\":423843,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Corporate Law: Corporate Governance Law\",\"volume\":\"10 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2003-04-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"246\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Corporate Law: Corporate Governance Law\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.382660\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Corporate Law: Corporate Governance Law","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.382660","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 246

摘要

本文对交叉上市的绑定假说提出了质疑,即公司可能希望在外国股票市场上市,以租用该市场的优越公司治理体系。交叉上市研究往往忽略了美国监管制度的特殊结构,美国监管制度是针对外国发行人的。本文突出了这些特征,并对现有的经验证据进行了全面的调查。对这些证据的批判性回顾表明,一个相反的“回避假设”更贴切地描述了公司在公司治理问题上的交叉上市行为。如果有什么区别的话,那就是更严格的制度会阻止发行人,而且有证据表明,内部人士在交叉上市的决定上表现得很投机。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Cross-Listing and Corporate Governance: Bonding or Avoiding?
This paper questions the bonding hypothesis on cross-listing - namely, the idea that firms may want to list on a foreign stock market with a view to renting that market's superior corporate governance system. All too often, cross-listing studies are oblivious to the special structure of the U.S. regulatory regime, which governs foreign issuers. This paper highlights these features and provides a comprehensive survey of the extant empirical evidence. A critical review of this evidence reveals that an opposite, "avoiding hypothesis" more aptly describes firms' cross-listing behavior with regard to corporate governance issues. If anything, more stringent regimes deter issuers, and there is evidence that insiders behave opportunistically with regard to the cross-listing decision.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信