{"title":"交叉上市与公司治理:结合还是回避?","authors":"A. Licht","doi":"10.2139/SSRN.382660","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper questions the bonding hypothesis on cross-listing - namely, the idea that firms may want to list on a foreign stock market with a view to renting that market's superior corporate governance system. All too often, cross-listing studies are oblivious to the special structure of the U.S. regulatory regime, which governs foreign issuers. This paper highlights these features and provides a comprehensive survey of the extant empirical evidence. A critical review of this evidence reveals that an opposite, \"avoiding hypothesis\" more aptly describes firms' cross-listing behavior with regard to corporate governance issues. If anything, more stringent regimes deter issuers, and there is evidence that insiders behave opportunistically with regard to the cross-listing decision.","PeriodicalId":423843,"journal":{"name":"Corporate Law: Corporate Governance Law","volume":"10 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2003-04-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"246","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Cross-Listing and Corporate Governance: Bonding or Avoiding?\",\"authors\":\"A. Licht\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/SSRN.382660\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper questions the bonding hypothesis on cross-listing - namely, the idea that firms may want to list on a foreign stock market with a view to renting that market's superior corporate governance system. All too often, cross-listing studies are oblivious to the special structure of the U.S. regulatory regime, which governs foreign issuers. This paper highlights these features and provides a comprehensive survey of the extant empirical evidence. A critical review of this evidence reveals that an opposite, \\\"avoiding hypothesis\\\" more aptly describes firms' cross-listing behavior with regard to corporate governance issues. If anything, more stringent regimes deter issuers, and there is evidence that insiders behave opportunistically with regard to the cross-listing decision.\",\"PeriodicalId\":423843,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Corporate Law: Corporate Governance Law\",\"volume\":\"10 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2003-04-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"246\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Corporate Law: Corporate Governance Law\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.382660\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Corporate Law: Corporate Governance Law","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.382660","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Cross-Listing and Corporate Governance: Bonding or Avoiding?
This paper questions the bonding hypothesis on cross-listing - namely, the idea that firms may want to list on a foreign stock market with a view to renting that market's superior corporate governance system. All too often, cross-listing studies are oblivious to the special structure of the U.S. regulatory regime, which governs foreign issuers. This paper highlights these features and provides a comprehensive survey of the extant empirical evidence. A critical review of this evidence reveals that an opposite, "avoiding hypothesis" more aptly describes firms' cross-listing behavior with regard to corporate governance issues. If anything, more stringent regimes deter issuers, and there is evidence that insiders behave opportunistically with regard to the cross-listing decision.