{"title":"投资教育和培训","authors":"A. D. Bonham-Carter","doi":"10.1049/IPEJ.1956.0069","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT HAS BEEN a vital partner in education for more than 200 years. Even before the Constitution was adopted, the Ordinance of 1785 set aside a section in every township in the new territories west of Pennsylvania to support a school. In 1862 the first Morrill Act authorized Federal land grants to States for the establishment of colleges. As World War II came to an end, a grateful Nation offered the G.I. bill, which eventually served nearly 8 million returning veterans—and fundamentally changed the educational landscape of the country. Today, Federal educational loans and grants open the doors to college for millions of students who could not otherwise attend, and Federal grants to low-income schools help more than 6 million children learn to read and to do math. Learning is a lifelong process, not limited to those between the ages of 5 and 25. From early childhood education to college to training for the unemployed, this Administration has sought to complement the efforts of State and local governments in responding to the new demands of the labor market. The Nation is in the midst of an educational renewal, and families, teachers, local school districts, colleges, States, employers, and the Federal Government all have a role to play in the transformation. The renewed Federal interest in education and training is in part a response to the two challenges outlined in Chapter 1: the slowdown in the growth of productivity and the increase in earnings inequality. Education and training policy is one of the few policy levers available to address both problems simultaneously. One of the most dramatic changes in our economy during the past 15 years has been the increased economic payoff to skills, as reflected in the increased inequality in earnings between high school and college graduates. In 1979 full-time male workers aged 25 and over with at least a bachelor’s degree earned on average 49 percent more per year than did comparable workers with only a high school degree. By 1993 the difference in wages had nearly doubled, to 89 percent. To the extent that this rise in the payoff to education reflects an increase in the value of skill, improving our schools and expanding access to postsecondary training stimulate economic growth. Based on estimates from the Bureau of Labor Statistics, the rise in the average educational attainment of the","PeriodicalId":277764,"journal":{"name":"Journal of The Institution of Production Engineers","volume":"75 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1956-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Investing in education and training\",\"authors\":\"A. D. Bonham-Carter\",\"doi\":\"10.1049/IPEJ.1956.0069\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT HAS BEEN a vital partner in education for more than 200 years. Even before the Constitution was adopted, the Ordinance of 1785 set aside a section in every township in the new territories west of Pennsylvania to support a school. In 1862 the first Morrill Act authorized Federal land grants to States for the establishment of colleges. As World War II came to an end, a grateful Nation offered the G.I. bill, which eventually served nearly 8 million returning veterans—and fundamentally changed the educational landscape of the country. Today, Federal educational loans and grants open the doors to college for millions of students who could not otherwise attend, and Federal grants to low-income schools help more than 6 million children learn to read and to do math. Learning is a lifelong process, not limited to those between the ages of 5 and 25. From early childhood education to college to training for the unemployed, this Administration has sought to complement the efforts of State and local governments in responding to the new demands of the labor market. The Nation is in the midst of an educational renewal, and families, teachers, local school districts, colleges, States, employers, and the Federal Government all have a role to play in the transformation. The renewed Federal interest in education and training is in part a response to the two challenges outlined in Chapter 1: the slowdown in the growth of productivity and the increase in earnings inequality. Education and training policy is one of the few policy levers available to address both problems simultaneously. One of the most dramatic changes in our economy during the past 15 years has been the increased economic payoff to skills, as reflected in the increased inequality in earnings between high school and college graduates. In 1979 full-time male workers aged 25 and over with at least a bachelor’s degree earned on average 49 percent more per year than did comparable workers with only a high school degree. By 1993 the difference in wages had nearly doubled, to 89 percent. To the extent that this rise in the payoff to education reflects an increase in the value of skill, improving our schools and expanding access to postsecondary training stimulate economic growth. Based on estimates from the Bureau of Labor Statistics, the rise in the average educational attainment of the\",\"PeriodicalId\":277764,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of The Institution of Production Engineers\",\"volume\":\"75 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1956-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of The Institution of Production Engineers\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1049/IPEJ.1956.0069\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of The Institution of Production Engineers","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1049/IPEJ.1956.0069","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
摘要
200多年来,联邦政府一直是教育领域的重要合作伙伴。早在宪法通过之前,1785年的法令就在宾夕法尼亚州西部新领土的每个乡镇划出一块土地来支持一所学校。1862年,第一部《莫里尔法案》授权联邦政府将土地授予各州以建立大学。随着第二次世界大战的结束,一个心怀感激的国家提出了《退伍军人法案》,该法案最终为近800万退伍军人提供了服务,并从根本上改变了这个国家的教育格局。今天,联邦教育贷款和助学金为数百万原本无法上大学的学生打开了大学的大门,联邦政府对低收入学校的拨款帮助600多万儿童学习阅读和数学。学习是一个终身的过程,不局限于5到25岁的人。从幼儿教育到大学教育再到失业人员培训,本届政府力求配合州和地方政府的努力,以应对劳动力市场的新需求。美国正处于教育改革的过程中,家庭、教师、地方学区、大学、各州、雇主和联邦政府都应该在这一变革中发挥作用。联邦政府重新对教育和培训产生兴趣,在一定程度上是对第一章中概述的两大挑战的回应:生产率增长放缓和收入不平等加剧。教育和培训政策是同时解决这两个问题的少数政策手段之一。在过去的15年里,我们经济中最戏剧性的变化之一就是技能的经济回报增加了,这反映在高中和大学毕业生之间收入差距的扩大上。1979年,年龄在25岁及以上、至少拥有学士学位的全职男性工人的平均年收入比只有高中学历的同等工人高出49%。到1993年,工资差距几乎翻了一番,达到89%。在某种程度上,教育回报的增加反映了技能价值的提高,改善我们的学校和扩大接受高等教育培训的机会刺激了经济增长。根据美国劳工统计局(Bureau of Labor Statistics)的估计,美国人平均受教育程度的提高
THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT HAS BEEN a vital partner in education for more than 200 years. Even before the Constitution was adopted, the Ordinance of 1785 set aside a section in every township in the new territories west of Pennsylvania to support a school. In 1862 the first Morrill Act authorized Federal land grants to States for the establishment of colleges. As World War II came to an end, a grateful Nation offered the G.I. bill, which eventually served nearly 8 million returning veterans—and fundamentally changed the educational landscape of the country. Today, Federal educational loans and grants open the doors to college for millions of students who could not otherwise attend, and Federal grants to low-income schools help more than 6 million children learn to read and to do math. Learning is a lifelong process, not limited to those between the ages of 5 and 25. From early childhood education to college to training for the unemployed, this Administration has sought to complement the efforts of State and local governments in responding to the new demands of the labor market. The Nation is in the midst of an educational renewal, and families, teachers, local school districts, colleges, States, employers, and the Federal Government all have a role to play in the transformation. The renewed Federal interest in education and training is in part a response to the two challenges outlined in Chapter 1: the slowdown in the growth of productivity and the increase in earnings inequality. Education and training policy is one of the few policy levers available to address both problems simultaneously. One of the most dramatic changes in our economy during the past 15 years has been the increased economic payoff to skills, as reflected in the increased inequality in earnings between high school and college graduates. In 1979 full-time male workers aged 25 and over with at least a bachelor’s degree earned on average 49 percent more per year than did comparable workers with only a high school degree. By 1993 the difference in wages had nearly doubled, to 89 percent. To the extent that this rise in the payoff to education reflects an increase in the value of skill, improving our schools and expanding access to postsecondary training stimulate economic growth. Based on estimates from the Bureau of Labor Statistics, the rise in the average educational attainment of the