基于多相流模拟的CO2井井控考虑

Lei Zhou, Bjoern-Tore Anfinsen, Yahya Hashemian, Zhaoguang Yuan, I. Mosti
{"title":"基于多相流模拟的CO2井井控考虑","authors":"Lei Zhou, Bjoern-Tore Anfinsen, Yahya Hashemian, Zhaoguang Yuan, I. Mosti","doi":"10.2118/210132-ms","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n CCUS (Carbon Capture Utilization and Storage) is expected to be an important contributor to the ambition of reaching a net zero objective. Drilling and workover of wells to be used as CO2 injectors, pose a well control risk that needs to be properly understood and minimized.\n The paper will address the significant differences between CO2 wells and traditional hydrocarbon wells. Due to differences in phase behavior, both well design and operational procedures would be impacted and needs to be revised. Traditional well control procedures are not necessarily applicable in CCUS wells without modifications.\n A generic well was used to study the differences between a CO2 well and a hydrocarbon (methane) well with respect to design and procedural changes in case of a well control incident. A well control simulator capable of transient multiphase modeling of hydrocarbon and CO2 systems was used to evaluate the differences. Important operational and design limiting factors like volume, pressure and temperature responses, hydrate formation, phase transition as well as mitigation strategies and contingencies were evaluated. The model showed that with both SOBM and WBM, the CO2 influx entered the well in its supercritical form. Under static conditions, the CO2 remained in its supercritical form and showed no migration in SOBM, making its detection more challenging than for a methane influx. Driller's method was applied while simulating circulating the CO2 influx. For both mud types, the model showed greater liquid velocities compared to methane, which would reduce the time to react and put greater demands on surface equipment. The model also showed a greater drop in temperature than for a methane influx. Due to J-T cooling effect, the model shows that supercritical CO2 expansion near the surface can lead to significant temperature reduction, which in turn can lead to formation of hydrates and block the circulation. This effect also needs to be considered in the well design as the physical properties of the casings and surface pipes can be changed due to variation in temperature. Based on these results, measures to mitigate CO2 well control risks are discussed. This study will provide new knowledge regarding well control incidents related to CO2 wells. Improved understanding can be used to optimize operational procedures and potentially lead to new mitigation techniques.","PeriodicalId":223474,"journal":{"name":"Day 1 Mon, October 03, 2022","volume":"67 6","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Well Control Considerations for CO2 Wells Based on Multiphase Flow Simulations\",\"authors\":\"Lei Zhou, Bjoern-Tore Anfinsen, Yahya Hashemian, Zhaoguang Yuan, I. Mosti\",\"doi\":\"10.2118/210132-ms\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n CCUS (Carbon Capture Utilization and Storage) is expected to be an important contributor to the ambition of reaching a net zero objective. Drilling and workover of wells to be used as CO2 injectors, pose a well control risk that needs to be properly understood and minimized.\\n The paper will address the significant differences between CO2 wells and traditional hydrocarbon wells. Due to differences in phase behavior, both well design and operational procedures would be impacted and needs to be revised. Traditional well control procedures are not necessarily applicable in CCUS wells without modifications.\\n A generic well was used to study the differences between a CO2 well and a hydrocarbon (methane) well with respect to design and procedural changes in case of a well control incident. A well control simulator capable of transient multiphase modeling of hydrocarbon and CO2 systems was used to evaluate the differences. Important operational and design limiting factors like volume, pressure and temperature responses, hydrate formation, phase transition as well as mitigation strategies and contingencies were evaluated. The model showed that with both SOBM and WBM, the CO2 influx entered the well in its supercritical form. Under static conditions, the CO2 remained in its supercritical form and showed no migration in SOBM, making its detection more challenging than for a methane influx. Driller's method was applied while simulating circulating the CO2 influx. For both mud types, the model showed greater liquid velocities compared to methane, which would reduce the time to react and put greater demands on surface equipment. The model also showed a greater drop in temperature than for a methane influx. Due to J-T cooling effect, the model shows that supercritical CO2 expansion near the surface can lead to significant temperature reduction, which in turn can lead to formation of hydrates and block the circulation. This effect also needs to be considered in the well design as the physical properties of the casings and surface pipes can be changed due to variation in temperature. Based on these results, measures to mitigate CO2 well control risks are discussed. This study will provide new knowledge regarding well control incidents related to CO2 wells. Improved understanding can be used to optimize operational procedures and potentially lead to new mitigation techniques.\",\"PeriodicalId\":223474,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Day 1 Mon, October 03, 2022\",\"volume\":\"67 6\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-09-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Day 1 Mon, October 03, 2022\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2118/210132-ms\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Day 1 Mon, October 03, 2022","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2118/210132-ms","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

预计CCUS(碳捕集利用和封存)将成为实现净零目标的重要贡献者。作为二氧化碳注入井的钻井和修井作业带来了井控风险,需要正确理解并尽量降低风险。本文将讨论CO2井与传统油气井之间的显著差异。由于相行为的差异,井的设计和操作程序都会受到影响,需要进行修改。如果不进行修改,传统的井控程序不一定适用于CCUS井。通过一口普通井,研究了在发生井控事故时,二氧化碳井与碳氢(甲烷)井在设计和程序变化方面的差异。利用能够对烃类和CO2体系进行瞬态多相建模的井控模拟器来评估差异。评估了重要的操作和设计限制因素,如体积、压力和温度响应、水合物形成、相变以及缓解策略和突发事件。模型表明,无论采用SOBM还是WBM, CO2均以超临界形式进入井内。在静态条件下,CO2保持超临界状态,在SOBM中没有运移,这使得SOBM的检测比甲烷流入的检测更具挑战性。采用司钻的方法模拟循环CO2流入。对于这两种类型的泥浆,模型显示出比甲烷更大的液体流速,这将减少反应时间,并对地面设备提出更高的要求。该模型还显示,与甲烷流入相比,温度下降幅度更大。模型显示,由于J-T冷却效应,超临界CO2在地表附近膨胀会导致温度显著降低,进而导致水合物的形成,阻碍循环。由于温度的变化会改变套管和地面管道的物理性质,因此在井设计中也需要考虑到这种影响。在此基础上,探讨了降低CO2井控风险的措施。该研究将为与二氧化碳井相关的井控事故提供新的知识。增进了解可用于优化操作程序,并可能导致新的缓解技术。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Well Control Considerations for CO2 Wells Based on Multiphase Flow Simulations
CCUS (Carbon Capture Utilization and Storage) is expected to be an important contributor to the ambition of reaching a net zero objective. Drilling and workover of wells to be used as CO2 injectors, pose a well control risk that needs to be properly understood and minimized. The paper will address the significant differences between CO2 wells and traditional hydrocarbon wells. Due to differences in phase behavior, both well design and operational procedures would be impacted and needs to be revised. Traditional well control procedures are not necessarily applicable in CCUS wells without modifications. A generic well was used to study the differences between a CO2 well and a hydrocarbon (methane) well with respect to design and procedural changes in case of a well control incident. A well control simulator capable of transient multiphase modeling of hydrocarbon and CO2 systems was used to evaluate the differences. Important operational and design limiting factors like volume, pressure and temperature responses, hydrate formation, phase transition as well as mitigation strategies and contingencies were evaluated. The model showed that with both SOBM and WBM, the CO2 influx entered the well in its supercritical form. Under static conditions, the CO2 remained in its supercritical form and showed no migration in SOBM, making its detection more challenging than for a methane influx. Driller's method was applied while simulating circulating the CO2 influx. For both mud types, the model showed greater liquid velocities compared to methane, which would reduce the time to react and put greater demands on surface equipment. The model also showed a greater drop in temperature than for a methane influx. Due to J-T cooling effect, the model shows that supercritical CO2 expansion near the surface can lead to significant temperature reduction, which in turn can lead to formation of hydrates and block the circulation. This effect also needs to be considered in the well design as the physical properties of the casings and surface pipes can be changed due to variation in temperature. Based on these results, measures to mitigate CO2 well control risks are discussed. This study will provide new knowledge regarding well control incidents related to CO2 wells. Improved understanding can be used to optimize operational procedures and potentially lead to new mitigation techniques.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信