在大流行后的世界,如何解决进入绿色空间的不平等问题?伦敦的教训

M. Whitten, Peter Massini
{"title":"在大流行后的世界,如何解决进入绿色空间的不平等问题?伦敦的教训","authors":"M. Whitten, Peter Massini","doi":"10.1332/policypress/9781529219005.003.0009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Parks and green spaces have long been central to London’s identity. The importance of London’s greenness has been highlighted during COVID-19. Access to green space has featured prominently in government’s response, and use of public parks has dramatically increased. Yet, the pandemic also has brought existing inequalities into sharper focus. Initial data suggest increased park use been driven by young and wealthy residents. This chapter explores two initiatives that emerged from this framework: The Urban Greening policy and the Liveable Neighbourhoods programme. These initiatives reframe London’s approach to urban greening by integrating a broader spectrum of green elements – including trees, pocket parks, and vegetated roofs and walls — into streets, buildings and public realm. This builds a network of greener civic spaces that connect to and augment existing parks while magnifying benefits green spaces provide. Rather than proposing wholly new solutions to address complex problems reinforced by the pandemic, this chapter reflects on whether accelerated implementation of existing initiatives provides a more pragmatic approach to achieving more equitable access to increased greening across London.","PeriodicalId":143200,"journal":{"name":"Volume 3: Public Space and Mobility","volume":"26 10","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"How Can Inequalities in Access to Green Space be Addressed in a Post-Pandemic World? Lessons from London\",\"authors\":\"M. Whitten, Peter Massini\",\"doi\":\"10.1332/policypress/9781529219005.003.0009\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Parks and green spaces have long been central to London’s identity. The importance of London’s greenness has been highlighted during COVID-19. Access to green space has featured prominently in government’s response, and use of public parks has dramatically increased. Yet, the pandemic also has brought existing inequalities into sharper focus. Initial data suggest increased park use been driven by young and wealthy residents. This chapter explores two initiatives that emerged from this framework: The Urban Greening policy and the Liveable Neighbourhoods programme. These initiatives reframe London’s approach to urban greening by integrating a broader spectrum of green elements – including trees, pocket parks, and vegetated roofs and walls — into streets, buildings and public realm. This builds a network of greener civic spaces that connect to and augment existing parks while magnifying benefits green spaces provide. Rather than proposing wholly new solutions to address complex problems reinforced by the pandemic, this chapter reflects on whether accelerated implementation of existing initiatives provides a more pragmatic approach to achieving more equitable access to increased greening across London.\",\"PeriodicalId\":143200,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Volume 3: Public Space and Mobility\",\"volume\":\"26 10\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-07-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Volume 3: Public Space and Mobility\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1332/policypress/9781529219005.003.0009\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Volume 3: Public Space and Mobility","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1332/policypress/9781529219005.003.0009","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

公园和绿地长期以来一直是伦敦的核心特征。在2019冠状病毒病期间,伦敦绿色的重要性得到了强调。在政府的应对措施中,获得绿色空间是一个突出的问题,公园的使用大幅增加。然而,这一流行病也使现有的不平等更加突出。初步数据显示,公园使用量的增加是由年轻富裕的居民推动的。本章探讨了从这一框架中产生的两项举措:城市绿化政策和宜居社区计划。这些举措通过将更广泛的绿色元素(包括树木、口袋公园、植被屋顶和墙壁)整合到街道、建筑和公共领域,重新构建了伦敦的城市绿化方法。这建立了一个更绿色的城市空间网络,连接并扩大了现有的公园,同时扩大了绿色空间提供的好处。本章没有提出全新的解决方案来解决疫情加剧的复杂问题,而是思考加速实施现有举措是否能提供一种更务实的方法,以实现伦敦各地更公平地获得更多绿化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
How Can Inequalities in Access to Green Space be Addressed in a Post-Pandemic World? Lessons from London
Parks and green spaces have long been central to London’s identity. The importance of London’s greenness has been highlighted during COVID-19. Access to green space has featured prominently in government’s response, and use of public parks has dramatically increased. Yet, the pandemic also has brought existing inequalities into sharper focus. Initial data suggest increased park use been driven by young and wealthy residents. This chapter explores two initiatives that emerged from this framework: The Urban Greening policy and the Liveable Neighbourhoods programme. These initiatives reframe London’s approach to urban greening by integrating a broader spectrum of green elements – including trees, pocket parks, and vegetated roofs and walls — into streets, buildings and public realm. This builds a network of greener civic spaces that connect to and augment existing parks while magnifying benefits green spaces provide. Rather than proposing wholly new solutions to address complex problems reinforced by the pandemic, this chapter reflects on whether accelerated implementation of existing initiatives provides a more pragmatic approach to achieving more equitable access to increased greening across London.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信