自动驾驶汽车的信任评估:系统综述

Zhilin Hu, Yangang Xing, Karl J. Proctor, A. Owens, Yifan Zhao
{"title":"自动驾驶汽车的信任评估:系统综述","authors":"Zhilin Hu, Yangang Xing, Karl J. Proctor, A. Owens, Yifan Zhao","doi":"10.54941/ahfe1003518","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The rapid development of automated vehicles offers the promising development of driver-vehicle interaction and cooperation. Trust is an important concept to consider for the future implementation of autonomous driving. An inappropriate level of trust can lead drivers to under-trust and reject the system's potential benefits or allow drivers to over-trust and abuse it. Therefore, autonomous vehicles need an appropriate level of trust for drivers to experience the full benefits of autonomous driving. This paper reports a systematic review of the literature to analyse the critical role of trust and also discusses various methods of evaluating the trust between drivers and automated vehicles to promote the use of autonomous driving on the ground.The review surveyed the trust in automated vehicles and followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. First, the importance of trust in increasing the acceptance of autonomous driving is investigated. Second, the factors influencing drivers' trust in autonomous driving are grouped and presented. The analysis focuses on individual driver characteristics, automated vehicles and the driving environment, such as driver preference, driving automation system and driving scenarios. Finally, the methodologies to measure trust in autonomous driving are reviewed and analysed. The key measurement indicators include questionnaires, physiological signals such as eye gaze, head and body postures, etc. and psychological signals such as electroencephalogram (EEG).This study is expected to summarise the factors that influence trust and to find reliable and replicable methods to measure trust. The results show that the influence of different factors on trust varies considerably. Currently, questionnaires are the most commonly used subjective measurement method, while psychophysiological measures are a promising objective complement and attract increasing investigations.","PeriodicalId":363648,"journal":{"name":"Human Aspects of Advanced Manufacturing","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Trust evaluation of automated vehicles: A systematic review\",\"authors\":\"Zhilin Hu, Yangang Xing, Karl J. Proctor, A. Owens, Yifan Zhao\",\"doi\":\"10.54941/ahfe1003518\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The rapid development of automated vehicles offers the promising development of driver-vehicle interaction and cooperation. Trust is an important concept to consider for the future implementation of autonomous driving. An inappropriate level of trust can lead drivers to under-trust and reject the system's potential benefits or allow drivers to over-trust and abuse it. Therefore, autonomous vehicles need an appropriate level of trust for drivers to experience the full benefits of autonomous driving. This paper reports a systematic review of the literature to analyse the critical role of trust and also discusses various methods of evaluating the trust between drivers and automated vehicles to promote the use of autonomous driving on the ground.The review surveyed the trust in automated vehicles and followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. First, the importance of trust in increasing the acceptance of autonomous driving is investigated. Second, the factors influencing drivers' trust in autonomous driving are grouped and presented. The analysis focuses on individual driver characteristics, automated vehicles and the driving environment, such as driver preference, driving automation system and driving scenarios. Finally, the methodologies to measure trust in autonomous driving are reviewed and analysed. The key measurement indicators include questionnaires, physiological signals such as eye gaze, head and body postures, etc. and psychological signals such as electroencephalogram (EEG).This study is expected to summarise the factors that influence trust and to find reliable and replicable methods to measure trust. The results show that the influence of different factors on trust varies considerably. Currently, questionnaires are the most commonly used subjective measurement method, while psychophysiological measures are a promising objective complement and attract increasing investigations.\",\"PeriodicalId\":363648,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Human Aspects of Advanced Manufacturing\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1900-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Human Aspects of Advanced Manufacturing\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.54941/ahfe1003518\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Human Aspects of Advanced Manufacturing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.54941/ahfe1003518","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

自动驾驶汽车的快速发展为人车交互与合作提供了广阔的发展前景。信任是未来实现自动驾驶需要考虑的一个重要概念。不适当的信任水平可能导致司机不信任并拒绝系统的潜在好处,或者允许司机过度信任和滥用它。因此,自动驾驶汽车需要适当程度的信任,才能让驾驶员体验到自动驾驶的全部好处。本文对文献进行了系统回顾,以分析信任的关键作用,并讨论了评估驾驶员和自动驾驶车辆之间信任的各种方法,以促进自动驾驶在地面上的使用。该评估调查了对自动驾驶汽车的信任程度,并遵循了系统评估和荟萃分析(PRISMA)指南的首选报告项目。首先,研究了信任对提高自动驾驶接受度的重要性。其次,对影响驾驶员对自动驾驶信任的因素进行分组和分析。分析的重点是驾驶员个体特征、自动驾驶车辆和驾驶环境,如驾驶员偏好、驾驶自动化系统和驾驶场景。最后,对测量自动驾驶信任的方法进行了回顾和分析。主要测量指标包括问卷调查、眼神、头部和身体姿势等生理信号和脑电图等心理信号。本研究旨在总结影响信任的因素,并找到可靠和可复制的方法来衡量信任。结果表明,不同因素对信任的影响差异较大。目前,问卷调查是最常用的主观测量方法,而心理生理测量是一种很有前景的客观补充,受到越来越多的研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Trust evaluation of automated vehicles: A systematic review
The rapid development of automated vehicles offers the promising development of driver-vehicle interaction and cooperation. Trust is an important concept to consider for the future implementation of autonomous driving. An inappropriate level of trust can lead drivers to under-trust and reject the system's potential benefits or allow drivers to over-trust and abuse it. Therefore, autonomous vehicles need an appropriate level of trust for drivers to experience the full benefits of autonomous driving. This paper reports a systematic review of the literature to analyse the critical role of trust and also discusses various methods of evaluating the trust between drivers and automated vehicles to promote the use of autonomous driving on the ground.The review surveyed the trust in automated vehicles and followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. First, the importance of trust in increasing the acceptance of autonomous driving is investigated. Second, the factors influencing drivers' trust in autonomous driving are grouped and presented. The analysis focuses on individual driver characteristics, automated vehicles and the driving environment, such as driver preference, driving automation system and driving scenarios. Finally, the methodologies to measure trust in autonomous driving are reviewed and analysed. The key measurement indicators include questionnaires, physiological signals such as eye gaze, head and body postures, etc. and psychological signals such as electroencephalogram (EEG).This study is expected to summarise the factors that influence trust and to find reliable and replicable methods to measure trust. The results show that the influence of different factors on trust varies considerably. Currently, questionnaires are the most commonly used subjective measurement method, while psychophysiological measures are a promising objective complement and attract increasing investigations.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信