争议邻里,或如何调和分歧

T. Radchuk
{"title":"争议邻里,或如何调和分歧","authors":"T. Radchuk","doi":"10.1080/13523279.2011.544382","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The geopolitical and cultural boundaries that exist between the European Union (EU) and its eastern neighbourhood – Belarus, Ukraine, Moldova and Russia – are subject to development as the various sides seek to construct and maintain distinctions and to delineate potential grounds for their reconciliation. Analysis of the foreign policy considerations of the countries, their relations with the EU and mutual perceptions and socio-cultural values reveals that the EU reinforces the boundaries rather than accommodating them, and much less transforming them. In contrast to the EU's ‘politics of exclusion’, the eastern neighbours are more ready to negotiate ‘disturbances’ and transform the rigid boundaries erected by the EU. The grounds of reconciliation lie in two-way positive perceptions of the various polities, and more importantly in certain cultural values that pertain to the EU but are seen by the countries' citizens as being important for their own societies.","PeriodicalId":206400,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Communist Studies and Transition Politics","volume":"9 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-02-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"14","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Contested Neighbourhood, or How to Reconcile the Differences\",\"authors\":\"T. Radchuk\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/13523279.2011.544382\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The geopolitical and cultural boundaries that exist between the European Union (EU) and its eastern neighbourhood – Belarus, Ukraine, Moldova and Russia – are subject to development as the various sides seek to construct and maintain distinctions and to delineate potential grounds for their reconciliation. Analysis of the foreign policy considerations of the countries, their relations with the EU and mutual perceptions and socio-cultural values reveals that the EU reinforces the boundaries rather than accommodating them, and much less transforming them. In contrast to the EU's ‘politics of exclusion’, the eastern neighbours are more ready to negotiate ‘disturbances’ and transform the rigid boundaries erected by the EU. The grounds of reconciliation lie in two-way positive perceptions of the various polities, and more importantly in certain cultural values that pertain to the EU but are seen by the countries' citizens as being important for their own societies.\",\"PeriodicalId\":206400,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Communist Studies and Transition Politics\",\"volume\":\"9 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2011-02-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"14\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Communist Studies and Transition Politics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/13523279.2011.544382\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Communist Studies and Transition Politics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13523279.2011.544382","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 14

摘要

欧洲联盟(欧盟)与其东部邻国- -白俄罗斯、乌克兰、摩尔多瓦和俄罗斯- -之间存在的地缘政治和文化边界受到发展的影响,因为各方寻求建立和维持区别,并划定其和解的潜在基础。对这些国家的外交政策考虑、它们与欧盟的关系、相互认知和社会文化价值观的分析表明,欧盟加强了边界,而不是容纳它们,更不用说改变它们。与欧盟的“排外政治”相反,东部邻国更愿意协商“骚乱”,改变欧盟建立的严格边界。和解的基础在于对各种政治的双向积极看法,更重要的是,某些文化价值观与欧盟有关,但被各国公民视为对自己的社会很重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Contested Neighbourhood, or How to Reconcile the Differences
The geopolitical and cultural boundaries that exist between the European Union (EU) and its eastern neighbourhood – Belarus, Ukraine, Moldova and Russia – are subject to development as the various sides seek to construct and maintain distinctions and to delineate potential grounds for their reconciliation. Analysis of the foreign policy considerations of the countries, their relations with the EU and mutual perceptions and socio-cultural values reveals that the EU reinforces the boundaries rather than accommodating them, and much less transforming them. In contrast to the EU's ‘politics of exclusion’, the eastern neighbours are more ready to negotiate ‘disturbances’ and transform the rigid boundaries erected by the EU. The grounds of reconciliation lie in two-way positive perceptions of the various polities, and more importantly in certain cultural values that pertain to the EU but are seen by the countries' citizens as being important for their own societies.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信