{"title":"出售合同中的所有权保留条款:PST Energy 7 Shipping v.o.w. Bunker Malta Limited","authors":"A. Pathak","doi":"10.1108/case.iima.2020.000198","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"‘Title retention Clause’ was introduced in sale of goods contracts to prevent the transfer of ownership till the seller was fully paid. Exigencies of businesses have led to introduction of further clauses allowing the buyer to use or sub-sell the goods even before the transfer of ownership. The conflicting provisions, as the judgment of the United Kingdom Supreme Court in PST Energy 7 Shipping v O.W. Bunker Malta Limited brings out, changes the very character of the contract. The contract fails to be a contract of sale of goods depriving the parties of the valuable rights.","PeriodicalId":433867,"journal":{"name":"Indian Institute of Management Ahmedabad","volume":"3 2","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-02-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Ownership Retention Terms in Sale Contracts Gone Astray: PST Energy 7 Shipping v.O.W. Bunker Malta Limited\",\"authors\":\"A. Pathak\",\"doi\":\"10.1108/case.iima.2020.000198\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"‘Title retention Clause’ was introduced in sale of goods contracts to prevent the transfer of ownership till the seller was fully paid. Exigencies of businesses have led to introduction of further clauses allowing the buyer to use or sub-sell the goods even before the transfer of ownership. The conflicting provisions, as the judgment of the United Kingdom Supreme Court in PST Energy 7 Shipping v O.W. Bunker Malta Limited brings out, changes the very character of the contract. The contract fails to be a contract of sale of goods depriving the parties of the valuable rights.\",\"PeriodicalId\":433867,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Indian Institute of Management Ahmedabad\",\"volume\":\"3 2\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-02-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Indian Institute of Management Ahmedabad\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1108/case.iima.2020.000198\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Indian Institute of Management Ahmedabad","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/case.iima.2020.000198","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
在货物买卖合同中引入了“所有权保留条款”，以防止所有权转移，直到卖方得到全额付款。企业的紧急情况导致引入进一步的条款，允许买方使用或转售货物，甚至在所有权转移之前。正如英国最高法院在PST Energy 7 Shipping诉O.W. Bunker Malta Limited一案中的判决所揭示的那样，这些相互冲突的条款改变了合同的本质。合同不属于货物买卖合同，剥夺了当事人的宝贵权利。
Ownership Retention Terms in Sale Contracts Gone Astray: PST Energy 7 Shipping v.O.W. Bunker Malta Limited
‘Title retention Clause’ was introduced in sale of goods contracts to prevent the transfer of ownership till the seller was fully paid. Exigencies of businesses have led to introduction of further clauses allowing the buyer to use or sub-sell the goods even before the transfer of ownership. The conflicting provisions, as the judgment of the United Kingdom Supreme Court in PST Energy 7 Shipping v O.W. Bunker Malta Limited brings out, changes the very character of the contract. The contract fails to be a contract of sale of goods depriving the parties of the valuable rights.
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
