共同的城市残余:接近秘密的社会基础设施

In Commons Pub Date : 1900-01-01 DOI:10.35483/acsa.am.111.67
R. Sproull
{"title":"共同的城市残余:接近秘密的社会基础设施","authors":"R. Sproull","doi":"10.35483/acsa.am.111.67","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Critical infrastructure doubling as social infrastructure has been a useful strategy for centuries. Projects with these overlapping programs usually spring from a handful of different design scenarios. They are often built initially as hard infrastructure and converted to social infrastructure at the end of their useful life. They can be modifications of existing ‘still-in-use’ critical infrastructure projects. Lastly, they can be designed as overlapping critical and social infrastructure from their conception.One method for establishing critical/social infrastructure is through enhanced public works projects where hard infrastructure is injected with additional social program. Often, this “thickening” of the program can face uphill battles related to increased funding, red tape, or public backlash, however, commoning, (the grass roots collaborative effort of a community to meet its needs), can be a viable alternative method for the creation of these enhancements. There already exist precedents of critical/social infrastructure evolving out of the commons. Chicano Park in San Diego and FDR Skate Park in Philadelphia are lasting examples which are related to residual space left after interstate highways were built. This paper will present ongoing research and teaching related to the overlap of critical and social infrastructure specifically as it relates to atypical methods for their creation. It will present a design course that explores opportunities to create social infrastructure in the overlooked spaces left by the construction of critical infrastructure. It will discuss this on a global level through case studies from around the world and a local level from a series of student design projects situated in a mid-size southern U.S. city. In these projects, residual spaces, (the highway right-of-way and surrounding neighborhood), become the setting for projects that can tap into the commons and be re-imagined as social infrastructure.","PeriodicalId":243862,"journal":{"name":"In Commons","volume":"14 3","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Commoning the Urban Residual: Approacing Clandestine Social Infrastructure\",\"authors\":\"R. Sproull\",\"doi\":\"10.35483/acsa.am.111.67\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Critical infrastructure doubling as social infrastructure has been a useful strategy for centuries. Projects with these overlapping programs usually spring from a handful of different design scenarios. They are often built initially as hard infrastructure and converted to social infrastructure at the end of their useful life. They can be modifications of existing ‘still-in-use’ critical infrastructure projects. Lastly, they can be designed as overlapping critical and social infrastructure from their conception.One method for establishing critical/social infrastructure is through enhanced public works projects where hard infrastructure is injected with additional social program. Often, this “thickening” of the program can face uphill battles related to increased funding, red tape, or public backlash, however, commoning, (the grass roots collaborative effort of a community to meet its needs), can be a viable alternative method for the creation of these enhancements. There already exist precedents of critical/social infrastructure evolving out of the commons. Chicano Park in San Diego and FDR Skate Park in Philadelphia are lasting examples which are related to residual space left after interstate highways were built. This paper will present ongoing research and teaching related to the overlap of critical and social infrastructure specifically as it relates to atypical methods for their creation. It will present a design course that explores opportunities to create social infrastructure in the overlooked spaces left by the construction of critical infrastructure. It will discuss this on a global level through case studies from around the world and a local level from a series of student design projects situated in a mid-size southern U.S. city. In these projects, residual spaces, (the highway right-of-way and surrounding neighborhood), become the setting for projects that can tap into the commons and be re-imagined as social infrastructure.\",\"PeriodicalId\":243862,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"In Commons\",\"volume\":\"14 3\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1900-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"In Commons\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.35483/acsa.am.111.67\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"In Commons","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.35483/acsa.am.111.67","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

几个世纪以来,关键基础设施作为社会基础设施的双重作用一直是一种有用的战略。具有这些重叠程序的项目通常来自少数不同的设计场景。它们通常最初作为硬基础设施建造,并在使用寿命结束时转换为社会基础设施。它们可以是对现有“仍在使用”的关键基础设施项目的修改。最后,它们可以从概念上设计为重叠的关键和社会基础设施。建立关键/社会基础设施的一种方法是通过加强公共工程项目,在硬基础设施中注入额外的社会项目。通常,计划的“增厚”会面临与增加资金、繁文缛节或公众反对有关的艰难战斗,然而,共同努力(社区的基层协作努力以满足其需求)可能是创建这些增强的可行替代方法。关键/社会基础设施从公地演化而来的先例已经存在。圣地亚哥的奇卡诺公园和费城的罗斯福滑板公园是州际高速公路建成后留下的剩余空间的持久例子。本文将介绍与关键和社会基础设施重叠相关的正在进行的研究和教学,特别是与它们的创建的非典型方法有关。它将呈现一个设计课程,探索在关键基础设施建设留下的被忽视的空间中创建社会基础设施的机会。它将通过来自世界各地的案例研究,以及位于美国南部中型城市的一系列学生设计项目,在全球层面上讨论这个问题。在这些项目中,剩余空间(高速公路路权和周围社区)成为项目的背景,这些项目可以利用公共空间,并被重新想象为社会基础设施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Commoning the Urban Residual: Approacing Clandestine Social Infrastructure
Critical infrastructure doubling as social infrastructure has been a useful strategy for centuries. Projects with these overlapping programs usually spring from a handful of different design scenarios. They are often built initially as hard infrastructure and converted to social infrastructure at the end of their useful life. They can be modifications of existing ‘still-in-use’ critical infrastructure projects. Lastly, they can be designed as overlapping critical and social infrastructure from their conception.One method for establishing critical/social infrastructure is through enhanced public works projects where hard infrastructure is injected with additional social program. Often, this “thickening” of the program can face uphill battles related to increased funding, red tape, or public backlash, however, commoning, (the grass roots collaborative effort of a community to meet its needs), can be a viable alternative method for the creation of these enhancements. There already exist precedents of critical/social infrastructure evolving out of the commons. Chicano Park in San Diego and FDR Skate Park in Philadelphia are lasting examples which are related to residual space left after interstate highways were built. This paper will present ongoing research and teaching related to the overlap of critical and social infrastructure specifically as it relates to atypical methods for their creation. It will present a design course that explores opportunities to create social infrastructure in the overlooked spaces left by the construction of critical infrastructure. It will discuss this on a global level through case studies from around the world and a local level from a series of student design projects situated in a mid-size southern U.S. city. In these projects, residual spaces, (the highway right-of-way and surrounding neighborhood), become the setting for projects that can tap into the commons and be re-imagined as social infrastructure.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信