公众参与组织sao保罗的LGBT骄傲游行

Paulo Roberto Santos
{"title":"公众参与组织sao保罗的LGBT骄傲游行","authors":"Paulo Roberto Santos","doi":"10.31560/2595-3206.2021.14.12285","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"São Paulo Pride, the biggest parade in Brazil and, for many years, the biggest in the world, conciliates interests of different stakeholders: social movements, civil society organizations, companies and the government. Nowadays, the only way for civil society and social movements to participate in the organization process is through working groups inside APOGLBT, the association in charge of the Pride organization. The present study aims to identify the limitations of this type, exploring other possibilities of participation during the organization of the event. In comparison to other mass gatherings in São Paulo, Pride is historically not recognised as a public policy by the municipal administration. The introduction and implementation of participative policies could tackle this issue, although it wouldn’t put an end to the inequality of power inside representative democracy and capitalist state.","PeriodicalId":231671,"journal":{"name":"Revista Brasileira de Estudos da Homocultura","volume":"62 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Participação Popular na Organização da Parada do Orgulho LGBT de São Paulo\",\"authors\":\"Paulo Roberto Santos\",\"doi\":\"10.31560/2595-3206.2021.14.12285\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"São Paulo Pride, the biggest parade in Brazil and, for many years, the biggest in the world, conciliates interests of different stakeholders: social movements, civil society organizations, companies and the government. Nowadays, the only way for civil society and social movements to participate in the organization process is through working groups inside APOGLBT, the association in charge of the Pride organization. The present study aims to identify the limitations of this type, exploring other possibilities of participation during the organization of the event. In comparison to other mass gatherings in São Paulo, Pride is historically not recognised as a public policy by the municipal administration. The introduction and implementation of participative policies could tackle this issue, although it wouldn’t put an end to the inequality of power inside representative democracy and capitalist state.\",\"PeriodicalId\":231671,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Revista Brasileira de Estudos da Homocultura\",\"volume\":\"62 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1900-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Revista Brasileira de Estudos da Homocultura\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.31560/2595-3206.2021.14.12285\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista Brasileira de Estudos da Homocultura","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31560/2595-3206.2021.14.12285","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

圣保罗大游行(o Paulo Pride)是巴西最大的游行,多年来一直是世界上最大的游行,它调和了不同利益相关者的利益:社会运动、民间社会组织、公司和政府。如今,市民社会和社会运动参与组织过程的唯一途径是通过负责Pride组织的APOGLBT内部的工作组。本研究旨在找出这种类型的局限性,探索在活动组织期间参与的其他可能性。与圣保罗的其他大型集会相比,“骄傲节”历来不被市政当局视为一项公共政策。参与性政策的引入和实施可以解决这一问题,但并不能终结代议制民主和资本主义国家内部的权力不平等。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Participação Popular na Organização da Parada do Orgulho LGBT de São Paulo
São Paulo Pride, the biggest parade in Brazil and, for many years, the biggest in the world, conciliates interests of different stakeholders: social movements, civil society organizations, companies and the government. Nowadays, the only way for civil society and social movements to participate in the organization process is through working groups inside APOGLBT, the association in charge of the Pride organization. The present study aims to identify the limitations of this type, exploring other possibilities of participation during the organization of the event. In comparison to other mass gatherings in São Paulo, Pride is historically not recognised as a public policy by the municipal administration. The introduction and implementation of participative policies could tackle this issue, although it wouldn’t put an end to the inequality of power inside representative democracy and capitalist state.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信