几何非线性叶片降阶模型与接触界面叶片降阶模型的比较研究

E. Delhez, F. Nyssen, J. Golinval, Alain Batailly
{"title":"几何非线性叶片降阶模型与接触界面叶片降阶模型的比较研究","authors":"E. Delhez, F. Nyssen, J. Golinval, Alain Batailly","doi":"10.1115/GT2020-14882","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n This paper investigates the use of different model reduction methods accounting for geometric nonlinearities. These methods are adapted to retain physical degrees-of-freedom in the reduced space in order to ease contact treatment. These reduction methods are applied to a 3D finite element model of an industrial compressor blade (NASA rotor 37). In order to compare the different reduction methods, a scalar indicator is defined. This performance indicator allows to quantify the accuracy of the predicted displacement both locally (at the blade tip) and globally. The robustness of each method with respect to variations of the external excitation is also assessed. The performances of the reduction methods are then compared in the case of frictional contact between the blade tip and the surrounding casing. This work brings evidence that reduced order models provide a computationally efficient alternative to full order finite element models for the accurate prediction of the time response of structures with both distributed and localized nonlinearities.","PeriodicalId":186943,"journal":{"name":"Volume 11: Structures and Dynamics: Structural Mechanics, Vibration, and Damping; Supercritical CO2","volume":"11 24 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-09-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparative Study of Blades Reduced Order Models With Geometrical Nonlinearities and Contact Interfaces\",\"authors\":\"E. Delhez, F. Nyssen, J. Golinval, Alain Batailly\",\"doi\":\"10.1115/GT2020-14882\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n This paper investigates the use of different model reduction methods accounting for geometric nonlinearities. These methods are adapted to retain physical degrees-of-freedom in the reduced space in order to ease contact treatment. These reduction methods are applied to a 3D finite element model of an industrial compressor blade (NASA rotor 37). In order to compare the different reduction methods, a scalar indicator is defined. This performance indicator allows to quantify the accuracy of the predicted displacement both locally (at the blade tip) and globally. The robustness of each method with respect to variations of the external excitation is also assessed. The performances of the reduction methods are then compared in the case of frictional contact between the blade tip and the surrounding casing. This work brings evidence that reduced order models provide a computationally efficient alternative to full order finite element models for the accurate prediction of the time response of structures with both distributed and localized nonlinearities.\",\"PeriodicalId\":186943,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Volume 11: Structures and Dynamics: Structural Mechanics, Vibration, and Damping; Supercritical CO2\",\"volume\":\"11 24 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-09-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Volume 11: Structures and Dynamics: Structural Mechanics, Vibration, and Damping; Supercritical CO2\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1115/GT2020-14882\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Volume 11: Structures and Dynamics: Structural Mechanics, Vibration, and Damping; Supercritical CO2","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1115/GT2020-14882","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文研究了不同模型约简方法对几何非线性的影响。这些方法适合于在减小的空间中保持物理自由度,以便于接触治疗。将这些简化方法应用于工业压气机叶片(NASA转子37)的三维有限元模型。为了比较不同的约简方法,定义了一个标量指标。这个性能指标可以量化局部(叶尖)和全局预测位移的准确性。每种方法对外部激励变化的鲁棒性也进行了评估。在叶尖与周围机匣之间存在摩擦接触的情况下,比较了两种减小方法的性能。这项工作证明,降阶模型为准确预测具有分布和局部非线性的结构的时间响应提供了一种计算效率高的替代全阶有限元模型。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparative Study of Blades Reduced Order Models With Geometrical Nonlinearities and Contact Interfaces
This paper investigates the use of different model reduction methods accounting for geometric nonlinearities. These methods are adapted to retain physical degrees-of-freedom in the reduced space in order to ease contact treatment. These reduction methods are applied to a 3D finite element model of an industrial compressor blade (NASA rotor 37). In order to compare the different reduction methods, a scalar indicator is defined. This performance indicator allows to quantify the accuracy of the predicted displacement both locally (at the blade tip) and globally. The robustness of each method with respect to variations of the external excitation is also assessed. The performances of the reduction methods are then compared in the case of frictional contact between the blade tip and the surrounding casing. This work brings evidence that reduced order models provide a computationally efficient alternative to full order finite element models for the accurate prediction of the time response of structures with both distributed and localized nonlinearities.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信