俄国形式主义的命运(外国批评家所理解的俄国形式主义)

S. I. Sukhikh
{"title":"俄国形式主义的命运(外国批评家所理解的俄国形式主义)","authors":"S. I. Sukhikh","doi":"10.2753/RSL1061-197521030429","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The history and theory of Russian Formalism began to attract the attention of Western literary scholars as early as the 1920s. Western journals at that time published descriptive articles by Russian scholars such as Viktor Zhirmunskii, Boris Tomashevskii, A.N. Voznesenskii, and Nina Gourfinkel who were close to the Formalist movement. The works on Russian Formalism published in the 1930s and 40s and the early 1950s such as the articles by Manfred Kridl and William Harkins were also of a descriptive nature. However, following the appearance of Rene Wellek and Austin Warren's Theory of Literature, a work widely known in the West which confirmed its authors' close ties to Formalist and Structuralist methodology, interest in the Russian Formalist school of the 1920s began to grow sharply. Major studies devoted to an investigation of the history and theory of this critical movement began to appear. Among such works were two which in our view exemplify the attitude of Western literary scholarship toward Russian...","PeriodicalId":173745,"journal":{"name":"Soviet Studies in Literature","volume":"26 5","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1985-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Fate of Russian Formalism (Russian Formalism as Understood by Foreign Critics)\",\"authors\":\"S. I. Sukhikh\",\"doi\":\"10.2753/RSL1061-197521030429\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The history and theory of Russian Formalism began to attract the attention of Western literary scholars as early as the 1920s. Western journals at that time published descriptive articles by Russian scholars such as Viktor Zhirmunskii, Boris Tomashevskii, A.N. Voznesenskii, and Nina Gourfinkel who were close to the Formalist movement. The works on Russian Formalism published in the 1930s and 40s and the early 1950s such as the articles by Manfred Kridl and William Harkins were also of a descriptive nature. However, following the appearance of Rene Wellek and Austin Warren's Theory of Literature, a work widely known in the West which confirmed its authors' close ties to Formalist and Structuralist methodology, interest in the Russian Formalist school of the 1920s began to grow sharply. Major studies devoted to an investigation of the history and theory of this critical movement began to appear. Among such works were two which in our view exemplify the attitude of Western literary scholarship toward Russian...\",\"PeriodicalId\":173745,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Soviet Studies in Literature\",\"volume\":\"26 5\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1985-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Soviet Studies in Literature\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2753/RSL1061-197521030429\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Soviet Studies in Literature","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2753/RSL1061-197521030429","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

早在20世纪20年代,俄罗斯形式主义的历史和理论就开始引起西方文学学者的关注。当时的西方期刊发表了与形式主义运动关系密切的俄罗斯学者维克托·日尔蒙斯基、鲍里斯·托马舍夫斯基、A.N.沃兹涅先斯基、尼娜·古尔芬克尔等人的描述性文章。20世纪30、40年代和50年代初发表的关于俄罗斯形式主义的著作,如曼弗雷德·克里德尔和威廉·哈金斯的文章,也具有描述性。然而,随着勒内·韦勒克和奥斯汀·沃伦的《文学理论》的问世,人们对20世纪20年代俄罗斯形式主义学派的兴趣开始急剧增长。这部著作在西方广为人知,证实了其作者与形式主义和结构主义方法论的密切联系。专门研究这一批判运动的历史和理论的主要研究开始出现。在这些作品中,有两部在我们看来体现了西方文学学者对俄国文学的态度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Fate of Russian Formalism (Russian Formalism as Understood by Foreign Critics)
The history and theory of Russian Formalism began to attract the attention of Western literary scholars as early as the 1920s. Western journals at that time published descriptive articles by Russian scholars such as Viktor Zhirmunskii, Boris Tomashevskii, A.N. Voznesenskii, and Nina Gourfinkel who were close to the Formalist movement. The works on Russian Formalism published in the 1930s and 40s and the early 1950s such as the articles by Manfred Kridl and William Harkins were also of a descriptive nature. However, following the appearance of Rene Wellek and Austin Warren's Theory of Literature, a work widely known in the West which confirmed its authors' close ties to Formalist and Structuralist methodology, interest in the Russian Formalist school of the 1920s began to grow sharply. Major studies devoted to an investigation of the history and theory of this critical movement began to appear. Among such works were two which in our view exemplify the attitude of Western literary scholarship toward Russian...
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信